Bragg files motion to hold Trump in contempt for alleged gag order violations, threatens 30 days of

I don't believe it will happen, Trump's infamous delay tactics in court will carry him at least through the election. I would however take 5 years from today if death counts as losing his secret service detail

 

Ya know, that’s actually very witty. I’m impressed.

 

serious.

 

Nothing arbitrary about it. Standard terms 2 years from the date the offer was tendered. WTF is the matter with you anyway?

 

So y’all believe in the statute of limitations?

 

Silly question. You know there is a two-tier injustice system here. ONLY for democrats and the son of a POTUS. Our ignorant Marxists friends here don't see anything wrong with the Justice Department letting most of Hunter's tax evasion crimes run out.

 

Are you just a low-grade moron, or what? Be a man and accept a cut-off date as Election Day this year and let the game begin.

 

Neither.
You made an offer for me to choose, and now you renege? I can't trust you, Can anyone?

 

Just because YOU choose a timeframe doesn’t mean that I have to agree. Why won’t you agree to MY timeframe? See how that works? Jeeeez, where did you get your degree? Bud Light University?

 

EXACTLY​

 

Now the Trump Jurors Can Be Told
Without the limits placed on witness testimony, they can now learn why the case was faulty.
"Even if we assume, incorrectly, that it was a campaign expenditure, it wouldn’t have been reported until 30 days after the election. But again, none of this got to the jury, either through testimony or the judge’s instructions…Merchan was rather obviously biased here, but I’ll give him the benefit of a doubt and say he was just thoroughly ignorant of campaign finance law, and had no interest in boning up on it to properly instruct the jury."
https://www.wsj.com/articles/now-th...-4425ab87?mod=opinion_feat5_bestoftheweb_pos2

 

Now that it has come to light that a juror spoke about “Trump being convicted” a day before the jury announced its decision, these convictions should be thrown out immediately.

 

I haven’t seen any context. Do you have anything to offer @CoinOKC? .

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ny...bout-case-family-member-before-guilty-verdict

 

This could be some internet troll. We’ll see how it turns out.

 

Yes. It’s all over the news. Let me know and I’ll send you a link. I’m mobile right now so I’ll have to send it when I return home.

If this is true (and it appears to be true since Merchan himself brought it to Trump’s defense lawyers), it could be the catalyst to have the verdicts thrown out.

A juror isn’t allowed to speak about a case before a verdict is reached. This is a HUGE red flag in the American judicial process and can (and rightfully SHOULD) have extreme consequences.

 

June 7, 2024

The judge presiding over former President Trump’s New York criminal trial notified his defense team on Friday of a comment on the court's public Facebook page that implies one of the jurors discussed the guilty verdict with family before the trial concluded.

Fox News obtained the letter Judge Juan Merchan shared with Trump defense attorneys and Manhattan prosecutors.

"'Today, the Court became aware of a comment that was posted on the Unified Court System's public Facebook page and which I now bring to your attention. In the comment, the user, ‘Michael Anderson,’ states:

"’My cousin is a juror and says Trump is getting convicted! Thank you folks for all your hard work!!!!’"

The comment was posted on May 29 "regarding oral arguments in the Fourth Department of the Appellate Division unrelated to this proceeding."

The profile for "Michael Anderson" has little publicly available information, but the user identifies himself as a "Transabled & professional sh-- poster."

A Trump campaign official told Fox News Digital they are "investigating the matter."

Al Baker, state OCA spokesperson, said Friday that "as appropriate, the Court informed the parties once it learned of this online content."

The post came a day before Trump was found guilty on all 34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree. Trump had pleaded not guilty to all charges.

The six-week-long trial stemmed from charges brought by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ny...bout-case-family-member-before-guilty-verdict

 

It was bogus and you ate it up. Burp.

 

Just like Hunter's laptop was bogus, right?

Princeton, huh?

 

Drive-By strikes again.