Bragg files motion to hold Trump in contempt for alleged gag order violations, threatens 30 days of

You need to direct that to Juan Merchan

 

Have you considered maybe she commited more crimes than he said she did? So when he got in office, he couldn't actually "lock her up" because she was lying? . . . Of course you didn't.

 

Give me a timeframe. Are you saying he will go to jail/be impeached/lose Secret Service protection within… say, a week? A month? A year? Five years? Thirty years?

 

I just realized...didn't the Feds eliminate the name Bragg, because it was prejudiced?

So.....what the hell is this guy trying to do? Hmmm?

 

Yes. it was nice of him and anyone else here to post comments on this forum so that other members who may not have the character or desire to debate their flawed opinions can see them!

 

Mirror, mirror, on the wall show me ...
___________________________________________________________________
Funny how others see us much differently than we see ourselves.

 

I must agree with luck and the law in this case.

 

Yes, and 95% are Republicans. Can you name several democrats this is happening to? I didn't think so.

 

Look clown, Hillery's treason and criminal acts were outlined for the nation in a Justice Dept. press conference. Then, the Justice Dept. said no one would go after her for what she did and she was not prosecuted.

Trump should have made Hillery go on Prime time TV, confess to all her crimes including the money laundering Foundation, and them apologize the the American People. After she did that, pardon her! Otherwise, put her on trial.

 

Throw a bucket of water on her . . . ​

I'm melting, melting.
Ohhhhh, what a world, what a world.
Destroy my beautiful wickedness.

Hag!​

 

Judge Merchan keeps threatening. I'm looking forward to the day he actually pulls the trigger. How many people are on Trump's Secrete Service detail?

https://www.aol.com/donald-trump-trial-live-updates-114614776.html

 

2 years. Game?

 

SS will be happy to unload this toad on the jail staff. Save us millions.

 

Trump can use the "BIDEN DEFENCE." Traitors who steal classified info without authority and who pass it to ghost writers to make money from a book ARE TOO OLD, FEEBLE, AND TOO COGNATIVE CHALLENGED to be put on trial.

 

My bad - until now - I didn't even know the Secret Service had the authority to pick and choose their assignments.

 

Two years? Why so arbitrary? First, he won't be imprisoned over the phony charges he's facing now. These cases are falling apart quicker than toilet paper in the rain. Certainly, without a doubt, he will never lose Secret Service protection. Don't be foolish.

Now, he certainly MAY be impeached again by the lunatic liberals IF he becomes president again. But, surely that's not something you're willing to admit will happen... correct?

Let's see....... the election is in November. I'm willing to modify your terms and say this: Trump will not be imprisoned before the election nor will he lose Secret Service protection by then. Of course, I believe he will never be imprisoned and he will never lose Secret Service protection. But, that timeline is too indefinite.

So, how about this: If Trump is neither imprisoned before the election nor loses Secret Service protection by then, the loser of our little wager here agrees to never return to this forum. Deal?

 

So you ask him for a timeline on your terms of imprisoned/impeached/lose secret service, then when he gives it to you, you not only ask for an accelerated timeline, you alter your original terms... Sheesh

 

I didn't set terms. I simply asked for a timeframe. He gave his timeframe; I gave him my timeframe.

I believe my timeframe is more reasonable since it gives a definite cutoff date instead of an arbitrary "two years". Two years from when? Two years from today? Two years from the start of the trial in Georgia? Two years from the start of the trial in New York? Two years from the election? Two years from the last time President briben -edited- his pants? Nah, too arbitrary.

But, since you've interjected yourself into this, I'll make the same wager with you if you're interested. Care to play?

 

@freashmeat, It is like a warm, quiet, and fuzzy place around here until a fungal itch appears.

 

Hey Gene,

Can you explain why the crooked, compromised Democrap Judge is not going to allow the person who helped write the election finance laws explain the law to the Jury so that they understand why what Trump did not break any law which is why he was never put on trial in the past after being investigated? I DIDN'T THINK SO.