I did not say "[the fact] are never found on liberal fringe like Media Matters and MSNBC". What i did say is that sometimes it is so noisy they have to publish the truth. However, you did say that "I don't listen to anyone on the Right" (10-20-2010 11:16 PM). There are no excepts implies in that statement so I linked you to one that you might read. I bent over backwards to accommodate your quirks and you come back with this. You cannot even acknowledge the truth when you are presented with it. I will also bet that is just what your media will also do with it.
CoinOKC there is a world of difference between you making a statement here and someone making a statement elsewere now if you can not see that difference then I cant help that LOL
Back to the point instead of your side stepping the issue; Well, Let's see how fair the press really is. I wonder just how critical they are going to be of the liberal use of "blood libel". Is your press going to cover the story or not or do yopu not yet even know what I am talking about?
Well, Sarah Palin isn't on this forum either, but she's attacked here all the time for what she says "elsewhere". What's the diff? Seems like a double standard.. or can't you see that? LOL. Jerry Brown compares Whitman to Goebbels: Jerry Brown Compares Meg Whitman To A NAZI: 'Goebbels Invented This Kind Of Propaganda'
I think ignoring a direct question that came from an obvious re-write of the facts pretty much qualifies as a side step on you part. I know you have an inability to consider your own fallibility but the rest of us are exposed to your foibles every day. As you pointed out, MSNBC has already covered the story. The difference, oh thick-headed one, is that Palin used the term to talk about a Jew who had just been shot while Cohen actually is a Jew and has known the term and it’s history since he was a kid. The term was used by Christians against Jews originally, so for Palin to trot it out as a Christian and level it in her own defense in the wake of an assassination attempt on a Jewish Congresswoman is just a bit classless, ignorant, and probably well-received by the Tea Party crowd. False equivalency loses again.
That is a different approach. You are saying it is kind of like the "N" word? The logic for either are ridiculous. Funny how the orator himself nor the democratic whip agrees with you. I also guess that being a Jew also excuses him from the use of the comparison to Goebbels. All you have to do is admit that the only reason you are not upset is because he is liberal. And, no, I have not shown MSNBC "covered" the story. After what they did with Palin, "coverage" should not end until March. Anything less would show your and their true bias. BTW, It seems you are not a fan of Congresswoman Gabby Giffords. It seems she is a product of the same "southern education" I received.
The difference been that YOU made a statement here, if we discuss what they say here then it is because one of US brings those words to the forum
Great! I just brought to the forum the story about Jerry Brown comparing Meg Whitman to Goebbels. Would you like to discuss it here or should I start a new thread?
Sarah's the right's next best alternative to George though and they defend her constantly. That's what makes Sarah and the right so much fun! Is our children learning? Can you see Russia from your house? Geroge and Sarah? Priceless. For everything else, there's the rest of the right wing.
And for proof I offer; Read more: Capuano 'bloody' comment becomes flashpoint in union flap - Allston-Brighton, MA - Allston/Brighton TAB Capuano 'bloody' comment becomes flashpoint in union flap - Allston-Brighton, MA - Allston/Brighton TAB OOPS, that is another example of the left attacking the right. No wonder it took me so long to find it on the net. The lame street media is hiding it again.
