Are you ready to "Give Up the Constitution"

You're not as slow as I thought. Ding! Ding! Ding!

 

Maybe rlm has a point, I mean, look to the men themselves:

"I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they have lebensraum, and the filthy Jew doesn't oppress their wallets!"
-MLK

"Ask not what your country can do for you, ask how many Jews, Gypsies, and Retards you can kill for your country!"
-JFK

"We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, ah fuck it, Blitzkrieg!"
-Winston Churchill

 

View attachment 1270

Oh, well then, you've already lost your argument. You're fond of quoting Godwin's Law (which is a bunch of crap anyway) so, by the standards you use, you can't even mention the Nazis.

But, instead of doing that, why don't you attempt to have a discussion?

 

Even though YOU brought up the Nazi's first? I guess YOU lost your argument first and now the fact that I pointed it out makes my argument a lost argument? Hum?

 

See posts #3 and #14. Ass-hat.

http://www.partisanlines.com/threads/fox-news-changes-official-motto.49810/#post-220232

 

View attachment 1271

 

One can refer to the Nazis as often as necessary if it's applicable to the discussion. Speaking about Nazis in a contextual sense is perfectly legitimate and doesn't break some stupid internet meme rule.

Here, let me give you an example:

During WWII, FDR imprisoned in concentration camps Americans with Japanese ancestry in much the same way Nazis imprisoned Jews.

See? That's a perfectly legitimate analogy. But, since you don't want to have a valid discussion, just move along...

 

A meme rule you brought up as authoritative when the reverse context was used against you. Again, Mr. Hypocrite, no one is impressed by you, please go back under your bridge.

 

Also, internment camps and concentration camps were not alike at all, go read a book not written by Glen Beck.