Anyone remember this song?

"anonym_easynews_poster" <anonym@invalid.com> wrote in message
news:Zz6Ui.93925$e72.59359@fe07.news.easynews.com...
>
> "John "C"" <honestjohn@centurytel.net> wrote in message
> news:S6idnfwVVLotS73anZ2dnUVZ_saknZ2d@centurytel.net...
> >
> > "anonym_easynews_poster" <anonym@invalid.com> wrote in message
> >
> >> (When I said a "few people" I have to admit I exaggerated. Jock was the
> > only
> >> single fellow I ever saw who killed a dog with his own bare hands.)
> >
> > Well he was lucky that there wasn't two dogs because while he was busy
> > killing one dog the other one would have gnawed his balls off.
>
> If the dogs were going to cheat like that, then Jock's mate Wee Tam would
> have joined the fray and I suspect there would be two deid dogs, right?
When
> I said Jock was the only one I saw kill a dog, that is true, but I do know
> Wee Tam once killed a polis man so I suspect a bliddy Alsatian would be
nae
> trouble for the wee hard man.
>
> p.s. Stop changing the fucking facts, will you, or I'll send Wee Tam roon
to
> see ye? We were torking about meaner than *a* junkyard dog, not meaner
than
> a *pack* of fucking junkyard poodles.

I can piss farther than you can!

Number One

 

"??? rrock" <invalid@address.here> wrote in message

wavy g's number two fan wrote:
>
> wavy g's number won fan wrote:
>
> > John "C" is no match for wavy g:
> >
> >

> >>* 1973 *
> >>
> >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bad,_Bad_Leroy_Brown
> >>
> >>Number One
> >
> >
> > same thing lol. seventies was just like the fifftys except they were
> > wering plad and saying "groovy man" and "far out". good thing our
> > generation nows a thing or 2 about music.
>
> gee, i wonder where they learned it? Maybe we should have all just
> failed to develop anything regarding music or technology for a generation
> or two and seen what would have happened, ya think? Anyone seen my "plad"
> bells around? They're a sort of blue, you can't miss them.

I had a Leisure Suit.

I can say that the late 60s and early 70s were like a tampex:

"In the groove, Up tight, and outta sight"!

Number One
--

Art Deco [Labor and delivery]:

http://www.jibjab.com/view/145814

 

??? rrock is no match for wavy g:

>
>
>wavy g's number won fan wrote:
>
>> John "C" is no match for wavy g:
>>
>>
>>>"wavy g's number won fan" <numberwonfan@wavyg.net> wrote in message
>>>news:naq1i3l11kteoagvja0pm0vudl2f5gpsir@4ax.com...
>>>
>>>>Nomen Nescio is no match for wavy g:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Well the south side of Chicago
>>>>>Is the baddest part of town
>>>>>And if you go down there
>>>>>You better just beware
>>>>>Of a man named Leroy Brown
>>>>>
>>>>>Now Leroy more than trouble
>>>>>You see he stand about six foot four
>>>>>All the downtown ladies call him "treetop lover"
>>>>>All the men just call him "sir"
>>>>>
>>>>>And it's bad, bad Leroy Brown
>>>>>The baddest man in the whole damn town
>>>>>Badder than old King Kong
>>>>>And meaner than a junkyard dog
>>>>>
>>>>>Now Leroy he a gambler
>>>>>And he like his fancy clothes
>>>>>And he like to wave his diamond rings
>>>>>In front of everybody's nose
>>>>>He got a custom Continental
>>>>>He got an Eldorado too
>>>>>He got a 32 gun in his pocket for fun
>>>>>He got a razor in his shoe
>>>>>
>>>>>And it's bad, bad Leroy Brown
>>>>>The baddest man in the whole damn town
>>>>>Badder than old King Kong
>>>>>And meaner than a junkyard dog
>>>>>
>>>>>Well Friday bout a week ago
>>>>>Leroy shootin' dice
>>>>>And at the edge of the bar
>>>>>Sat a girl named Doris
>>>>>And ooh that girl looked nice
>>>>>Well he cast his eyes upon her
>>>>>And the trouble soon began
>>>>>And Leroy brown learned a lesson
>>>>>'Bout messin' with the wife of a jealous man
>>>>>
>>>>>And it's bad, bad Leroy Brown
>>>>>The baddest man in the whole damned town
>>>>>Badder than old King Kong
>>>>>And meaner than a junkyard dog,
>>>>>
>>>>>Well the two men took to fightin'
>>>>>And when they pulled them from the floor
>>>>>Leroy looked like a jigsaw puzzle
>>>>>With a couple of pieces gone
>>>>>
>>>>>And it's bad, bad Leroy Brown
>>>>>The baddest man in the whole damn town
>>>>>Badder than old King Kong
>>>>>And meaner than a junkyard dog
>>>>
>>>>i've never heard of thiss ong. it sounds like some crap from the 50"s.
>>>>u should, like, get more up to date and stuff dood.
>>>
>>>* 1973 *
>>>
>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bad,_Bad_Leroy_Brown
>>>
>>>Number One
>>
>>
>> same thing lol. seventies was just like the fifftys except they were
>> wering plad and saying "groovy man" and "far out". good thing our
>> generation nows a thing or 2 about music.
>
>gee, i wonder where they learned it? Maybe we should have all just
>failed to develop anything regarding music or technology for a generation
>or two and seen what would have happened, ya think?

i don"t think that's a very good suggestion, because stuff that happened
in the 50's influanced what happend in 60"s and seventes, and so on. we
r constanly lerning from our past, and to stifle an entire generation of
development whold devistate the generations to follow. look how much
we've developed on computers and war technolgy and especially pop music.
u've got some warped sencibilaties.


>Anyone seen my "plad"
>bells around? They're a sort of blue, you can't miss them.

 

John "C" wrote:

> "??? rrock" <invalid@address.here> wrote in message
>
> wavy g's number two fan wrote:
>
>>wavy g's number won fan wrote:
>>
>>
>>>John "C" is no match for wavy g:
>>>
>>>
>
>
>>>>* 1973 *
>>>>
>>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bad,_Bad_Leroy_Brown
>>>>
>>>>Number One
>>>
>>>
>>>same thing lol. seventies was just like the fifftys except they were
>>>wering plad and saying "groovy man" and "far out". good thing our
>>>generation nows a thing or 2 about music.
>>
>>gee, i wonder where they learned it? Maybe we should have all just
>>failed to develop anything regarding music or technology for a generation
>>or two and seen what would have happened, ya think? Anyone seen my "plad"
>>bells around? They're a sort of blue, you can't miss them.
>
>
> I had a Leisure Suit.
>
> I can say that the late 60s and early 70s were like a tampex:
>
> "In the groove, Up tight, and outta sight"!
>
> Number One
> --
>
> Art Deco [Labor and delivery]:
>
> http://www.jibjab.com/view/145814
>

late 60's early 70's were more like afros & picks, long side-burns,
STRIPES!!! people BIG on stipes, what else, high-heeled "shoes",
leather boots, macrame tops, "the dry look" (lololol), square belts buckles
with two holes instead of one, Gran Torino and the Stang MkIII, disco,
Peace with Honor, Raquel Welch, Maxi-skirts, MOOG synthesizers, ...

 

wavy g's number won fan wrote:

> ??? rrock is no match for wavy g:
>
>
>>
>>wavy g's number won fan wrote:
>>
>>
>>>John "C" is no match for wavy g:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>"wavy g's number won fan" <numberwonfan@wavyg.net> wrote in message
>>>>news:naq1i3l11kteoagvja0pm0vudl2f5gpsir@4ax.com...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Nomen Nescio is no match for wavy g:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Well the south side of Chicago
>>>>>>Is the baddest part of town
>>>>>>And if you go down there
>>>>>>You better just beware
>>>>>>Of a man named Leroy Brown
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Now Leroy more than trouble
>>>>>>You see he stand about six foot four
>>>>>>All the downtown ladies call him "treetop lover"
>>>>>>All the men just call him "sir"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>And it's bad, bad Leroy Brown
>>>>>>The baddest man in the whole damn town
>>>>>>Badder than old King Kong
>>>>>>And meaner than a junkyard dog
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Now Leroy he a gambler
>>>>>>And he like his fancy clothes
>>>>>>And he like to wave his diamond rings
>>>>>>In front of everybody's nose
>>>>>>He got a custom Continental
>>>>>>He got an Eldorado too
>>>>>>He got a 32 gun in his pocket for fun
>>>>>>He got a razor in his shoe
>>>>>>
>>>>>>And it's bad, bad Leroy Brown
>>>>>>The baddest man in the whole damn town
>>>>>>Badder than old King Kong
>>>>>>And meaner than a junkyard dog
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Well Friday bout a week ago
>>>>>>Leroy shootin' dice
>>>>>>And at the edge of the bar
>>>>>>Sat a girl named Doris
>>>>>>And ooh that girl looked nice
>>>>>>Well he cast his eyes upon her
>>>>>>And the trouble soon began
>>>>>>And Leroy brown learned a lesson
>>>>>>'Bout messin' with the wife of a jealous man
>>>>>>
>>>>>>And it's bad, bad Leroy Brown
>>>>>>The baddest man in the whole damned town
>>>>>>Badder than old King Kong
>>>>>>And meaner than a junkyard dog,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Well the two men took to fightin'
>>>>>>And when they pulled them from the floor
>>>>>>Leroy looked like a jigsaw puzzle
>>>>>>With a couple of pieces gone
>>>>>>
>>>>>>And it's bad, bad Leroy Brown
>>>>>>The baddest man in the whole damn town
>>>>>>Badder than old King Kong
>>>>>>And meaner than a junkyard dog
>>>>>
>>>>>i've never heard of thiss ong. it sounds like some crap from the 50"s.
>>>>>u should, like, get more up to date and stuff dood.
>>>>
>>>>* 1973 *
>>>>
>>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bad,_Bad_Leroy_Brown
>>>>
>>>>Number One
>>>
>>>
>>>same thing lol. seventies was just like the fifftys except they were
>>>wering plad and saying "groovy man" and "far out". good thing our
>>>generation nows a thing or 2 about music.
>>
>>gee, i wonder where they learned it? Maybe we should have all just
>>failed to develop anything regarding music or technology for a generation
>>or two and seen what would have happened, ya think?
>
>
> i don"t think that's a very good suggestion, because stuff that happened
> in the 50's influanced what happend in 60"s and seventes, and so on. we
> r constanly lerning from our past, and to stifle an entire generation of
> development whold devistate the generations to follow. look how much
> we've developed on computers and war technolgy and especially pop music.
> u've got some warped sencibilaties.
>

wow, ya think? So you're saying that's where they learned it? That's wild!
Have you got some proof or anything or are you just making that up?



>
>>Anyone seen my "plad"
>>bells around? They're a sort of blue, you can't miss them.

 

"??? rrock" <invalid@address.here> wrote in message
news:4721d297$0$24313$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
>
>
> John "C" wrote:
>
> > "??? rrock" <invalid@address.here> wrote in message
> >
> > wavy g's number two fan wrote:
> >
> >>wavy g's number won fan wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>John "C" is no match for wavy g:
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >
> >>>>* 1973 *
> >>>>
> >>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bad,_Bad_Leroy_Brown
> >>>>
> >>>>Number One
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>same thing lol. seventies was just like the fifftys except they were
> >>>wering plad and saying "groovy man" and "far out". good thing our
> >>>generation nows a thing or 2 about music.
> >>
> >>gee, i wonder where they learned it? Maybe we should have all just
> >>failed to develop anything regarding music or technology for a
generation
> >>or two and seen what would have happened, ya think? Anyone seen my
"plad"
> >>bells around? They're a sort of blue, you can't miss them.
> >
> >
> > I had a Leisure Suit.
> >
> > I can say that the late 60s and early 70s were like a tampex:
> >
> > "In the groove, Up tight, and outta sight"!
> >
> > Number One
> > --
> >
> > Art Deco [Labor and delivery]:
> >
> > http://www.jibjab.com/view/145814
> >
>
> late 60's early 70's were more like afros & picks, long side-burns,
> STRIPES!!! people BIG on stipes, what else, high-heeled "shoes",
> leather boots, macrame tops, "the dry look" (lololol), square belts
buckles
> with two holes instead of one, Gran Torino and the Stang MkIII, disco,
> Peace with Honor, Raquel Welch, Maxi-skirts, MOOG synthesizers, ...

I sure liked the Raquel Welch part of that era.

Number One

 

??? rrock is no match for wavy g:

>
>
>wavy g's number won fan wrote:
>
>> ??? rrock is no match for wavy g:
>>
>>
>>>
>>>wavy g's number won fan wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>John "C" is no match for wavy g:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>"wavy g's number won fan" <numberwonfan@wavyg.net> wrote in message
>>>>>news:naq1i3l11kteoagvja0pm0vudl2f5gpsir@4ax.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Nomen Nescio is no match for wavy g:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Well the south side of Chicago
>>>>>>>Is the baddest part of town
>>>>>>>And if you go down there
>>>>>>>You better just beware
>>>>>>>Of a man named Leroy Brown
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Now Leroy more than trouble
>>>>>>>You see he stand about six foot four
>>>>>>>All the downtown ladies call him "treetop lover"
>>>>>>>All the men just call him "sir"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>And it's bad, bad Leroy Brown
>>>>>>>The baddest man in the whole damn town
>>>>>>>Badder than old King Kong
>>>>>>>And meaner than a junkyard dog
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Now Leroy he a gambler
>>>>>>>And he like his fancy clothes
>>>>>>>And he like to wave his diamond rings
>>>>>>>In front of everybody's nose
>>>>>>>He got a custom Continental
>>>>>>>He got an Eldorado too
>>>>>>>He got a 32 gun in his pocket for fun
>>>>>>>He got a razor in his shoe
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>And it's bad, bad Leroy Brown
>>>>>>>The baddest man in the whole damn town
>>>>>>>Badder than old King Kong
>>>>>>>And meaner than a junkyard dog
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Well Friday bout a week ago
>>>>>>>Leroy shootin' dice
>>>>>>>And at the edge of the bar
>>>>>>>Sat a girl named Doris
>>>>>>>And ooh that girl looked nice
>>>>>>>Well he cast his eyes upon her
>>>>>>>And the trouble soon began
>>>>>>>And Leroy brown learned a lesson
>>>>>>>'Bout messin' with the wife of a jealous man
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>And it's bad, bad Leroy Brown
>>>>>>>The baddest man in the whole damned town
>>>>>>>Badder than old King Kong
>>>>>>>And meaner than a junkyard dog,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Well the two men took to fightin'
>>>>>>>And when they pulled them from the floor
>>>>>>>Leroy looked like a jigsaw puzzle
>>>>>>>With a couple of pieces gone
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>And it's bad, bad Leroy Brown
>>>>>>>The baddest man in the whole damn town
>>>>>>>Badder than old King Kong
>>>>>>>And meaner than a junkyard dog
>>>>>>
>>>>>>i've never heard of thiss ong. it sounds like some crap from the 50"s.
>>>>>>u should, like, get more up to date and stuff dood.
>>>>>
>>>>>* 1973 *
>>>>>
>>>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bad,_Bad_Leroy_Brown
>>>>>
>>>>>Number One
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>same thing lol. seventies was just like the fifftys except they were
>>>>wering plad and saying "groovy man" and "far out". good thing our
>>>>generation nows a thing or 2 about music.
>>>
>>>gee, i wonder where they learned it? Maybe we should have all just
>>>failed to develop anything regarding music or technology for a generation
>>>or two and seen what would have happened, ya think?
>>
>>
>> i don"t think that's a very good suggestion, because stuff that happened
>> in the 50's influanced what happend in 60"s and seventes, and so on. we
>> r constanly lerning from our past, and to stifle an entire generation of
>> development whold devistate the generations to follow. look how much
>> we've developed on computers and war technolgy and especially pop music.
>> u've got some warped sencibilaties.
>>
>
>wow, ya think? So you're saying that's where they learned it? That's wild!
>Have you got some proof or anything or are you just making that up?

really? it seems a pretty simple concept 2 me, (and most people, at
that) but here u r, talking like u've just discovered it, and saying i'm
possibly "making [it] up." i mean, it's a pretty commonly accepted
theory: won thing leads to another, and all. i'm not suggesting post
hoc ergo propter hoc, but causality does seem to make some sense in
broad terms. i can probably provide scads of "proof" if it is actually
required of u, but come on man. seems a bit silly to doubt such a
thing.

 

John "C" wrote:

> "??? rrock" <invalid@address.here> wrote in message
> news:4721d297$0$24313$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
>
>>
>>John "C" wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"??? rrock" <invalid@address.here> wrote in message
>>>
>>>wavy g's number two fan wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>wavy g's number won fan wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>John "C" is no match for wavy g:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>* 1973 *
>>>>>>
>>>>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bad,_Bad_Leroy_Brown
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Number One
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>same thing lol. seventies was just like the fifftys except they were
>>>>>wering plad and saying "groovy man" and "far out". good thing our
>>>>>generation nows a thing or 2 about music.
>>>>
>>>>gee, i wonder where they learned it? Maybe we should have all just
>>>>failed to develop anything regarding music or technology for a
>
> generation
>
>>>>or two and seen what would have happened, ya think? Anyone seen my
>
> "plad"
>
>>>>bells around? They're a sort of blue, you can't miss them.
>>>
>>>
>>>I had a Leisure Suit.
>>>
>>>I can say that the late 60s and early 70s were like a tampex:
>>>
>>>"In the groove, Up tight, and outta sight"!
>>>
>>>Number One
>>>--
>>>
>>>Art Deco [Labor and delivery]:
>>>
>>>http://www.jibjab.com/view/145814
>>>
>>
>>late 60's early 70's were more like afros & picks, long side-burns,
>>STRIPES!!! people BIG on stipes, what else, high-heeled "shoes",
>>leather boots, macrame tops, "the dry look" (lololol), square belts
>
> buckles
>
>>with two holes instead of one, Gran Torino and the Stang MkIII, disco,
>>Peace with Honor, Raquel Welch, Maxi-skirts, MOOG synthesizers, ...
>
>
> I sure liked the Raquel Welch part of that era.
>
> Number One
>

God yes. Sophia Loren was just starting to fade. I still don't remember
"plad" though, lol, except flannel shirts for huntn, etc., nothing to
be era specific about, really.


--

Гордый Спонсор Ангела Смерти и ее Легионов Сестер
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.angels/msg/2f5df80dfa199b93

The Parapraxis League of the Clueless needs donations
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.angels/msg/06dbb46ae3c920b6?dmode=source

Support the Mother's Against Stalker Gay-Queer Worms Association
Give generously! http://deadbeef.lol33ta.com/DeadBeef

 

wavy g's number won fan wrote:

> rrock is no match for wavy g:
>
>
>>
>>wavy g's number won fan wrote:
>>
>>
>>> rrock is no match for wavy g:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>wavy g's number won fan wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>John "C" is no match for wavy g:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>"wavy g's number won fan" <numberwonfan@wavyg.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:naq1i3l11kteoagvja0pm0vudl2f5gpsir@4ax.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Nomen Nescio is no match for wavy g:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Well the south side of Chicago
>>>>>>>>Is the baddest part of town
>>>>>>>>And if you go down there
>>>>>>>>You better just beware
>>>>>>>>Of a man named Leroy Brown
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Now Leroy more than trouble
>>>>>>>>You see he stand about six foot four
>>>>>>>>All the downtown ladies call him "treetop lover"
>>>>>>>>All the men just call him "sir"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>And it's bad, bad Leroy Brown
>>>>>>>>The baddest man in the whole damn town
>>>>>>>>Badder than old King Kong
>>>>>>>>And meaner than a junkyard dog
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Now Leroy he a gambler
>>>>>>>>And he like his fancy clothes
>>>>>>>>And he like to wave his diamond rings
>>>>>>>>In front of everybody's nose
>>>>>>>>He got a custom Continental
>>>>>>>>He got an Eldorado too
>>>>>>>>He got a 32 gun in his pocket for fun
>>>>>>>>He got a razor in his shoe
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>And it's bad, bad Leroy Brown
>>>>>>>>The baddest man in the whole damn town
>>>>>>>>Badder than old King Kong
>>>>>>>>And meaner than a junkyard dog
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Well Friday bout a week ago
>>>>>>>>Leroy shootin' dice
>>>>>>>>And at the edge of the bar
>>>>>>>>Sat a girl named Doris
>>>>>>>>And ooh that girl looked nice
>>>>>>>>Well he cast his eyes upon her
>>>>>>>>And the trouble soon began
>>>>>>>>And Leroy brown learned a lesson
>>>>>>>>'Bout messin' with the wife of a jealous man
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>And it's bad, bad Leroy Brown
>>>>>>>>The baddest man in the whole damned town
>>>>>>>>Badder than old King Kong
>>>>>>>>And meaner than a junkyard dog,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Well the two men took to fightin'
>>>>>>>>And when they pulled them from the floor
>>>>>>>>Leroy looked like a jigsaw puzzle
>>>>>>>>With a couple of pieces gone
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>And it's bad, bad Leroy Brown
>>>>>>>>The baddest man in the whole damn town
>>>>>>>>Badder than old King Kong
>>>>>>>>And meaner than a junkyard dog
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>i've never heard of thiss ong. it sounds like some crap from the 50"s.
>>>>>>>u should, like, get more up to date and stuff dood.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>* 1973 *
>>>>>>
>>>>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bad,_Bad_Leroy_Brown
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Number One
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>same thing lol. seventies was just like the fifftys except they were
>>>>>wering plad and saying "groovy man" and "far out". good thing our
>>>>>generation nows a thing or 2 about music.
>>>>
>>>>gee, i wonder where they learned it? Maybe we should have all just
>>>>failed to develop anything regarding music or technology for a generation
>>>>or two and seen what would have happened, ya think?
>>>
>>>
>>>i don"t think that's a very good suggestion, because stuff that happened
>>>in the 50's influanced what happend in 60"s and seventes, and so on. we
>>>r constanly lerning from our past, and to stifle an entire generation of
>>>development whold devistate the generations to follow. look how much
>>>we've developed on computers and war technolgy and especially pop music.
>>>u've got some warped sencibilaties.
>>>
>>
>>wow, ya think? So you're saying that's where they learned it? That's wild!
>>Have you got some proof or anything or are you just making that up?
>
>
> really? it seems a pretty simple concept 2 me, (and most people, at
> that) but here u r, talking like u've just discovered it, and saying i'm
> possibly "making [it] up." i mean, it's a pretty commonly accepted
> theory: won thing leads to another, and all. i'm not suggesting post
> hoc ergo propter hoc, but causality does seem to make some sense in
> broad terms. i can probably provide scads of "proof" if it is actually
> required of u, but come on man. seems a bit silly to doubt such a
> thing.
>

Are you sure i said you're possibly making it up? I'm pretty sure that
i only asked if proof was in your possession or if you had made it up.
I don't normally make assertions in interrogatives and usually restrict
the same for the normally intended purpose of information acquisition.

--

?????? ??????? ?????? ?????? ? ?? ???????? ??????
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.angels/msg/2f5df80dfa199b93

The Parapraxis League of the Clueless needs donations
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.angels/msg/06dbb46ae3c920b6?dmode=source

Support the Mother's Against Stalker Gay-Queer Worms Association
Give generously! http://deadbeef.lol33ta.com/DeadBeef

 

"??? rrock" <invalid@address.here> wrote in message
news:47227e0b$0$32514$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
>
>
> John "C" wrote:
>
> > "??? rrock" <invalid@address.here> wrote in message
> > news:4721d297$0$24313$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
> >
> >>
> >>John "C" wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>"??? rrock" <invalid@address.here> wrote in message
> >>>
> >>>wavy g's number two fan wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>wavy g's number won fan wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>John "C" is no match for wavy g:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>* 1973 *
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bad,_Bad_Leroy_Brown
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Number One
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>same thing lol. seventies was just like the fifftys except they were
> >>>>>wering plad and saying "groovy man" and "far out". good thing our
> >>>>>generation nows a thing or 2 about music.
> >>>>
> >>>>gee, i wonder where they learned it? Maybe we should have all just
> >>>>failed to develop anything regarding music or technology for a
> >
> > generation
> >
> >>>>or two and seen what would have happened, ya think? Anyone seen my
> >
> > "plad"
> >
> >>>>bells around? They're a sort of blue, you can't miss them.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>I had a Leisure Suit.
> >>>
> >>>I can say that the late 60s and early 70s were like a tampex:
> >>>
> >>>"In the groove, Up tight, and outta sight"!
> >>>
> >>>Number One
> >>>--
> >>>
> >>>Art Deco [Labor and delivery]:
> >>>
> >>>http://www.jibjab.com/view/145814
> >>>
> >>
> >>late 60's early 70's were more like afros & picks, long side-burns,
> >>STRIPES!!! people BIG on stipes, what else, high-heeled "shoes",
> >>leather boots, macrame tops, "the dry look" (lololol), square belts
> >
> > buckles
> >
> >>with two holes instead of one, Gran Torino and the Stang MkIII, disco,
> >>Peace with Honor, Raquel Welch, Maxi-skirts, MOOG synthesizers, ...
> >
> >
> > I sure liked the Raquel Welch part of that era.
> >
> > Number One
> >
>
> God yes. Sophia Loren was just starting to fade. I still don't remember
> "plad" though, lol, except flannel shirts for huntn, etc., nothing to
> be era specific about, really.

Then Twiggy came along and ruined the "Big Boobs Look" because she didn't
have any!

Number One

 

??? rrock is no match for wavy g:

>
>
>wavy g's number won fan wrote:
>
>> ??? rrock is no match for wavy g:
>>
>>
>>>
>>>wavy g's number won fan wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>??? rrock is no match for wavy g:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>wavy g's number won fan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>John "C" is no match for wavy g:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"wavy g's number won fan" <numberwonfan@wavyg.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>>news:naq1i3l11kteoagvja0pm0vudl2f5gpsir@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Nomen Nescio is no match for wavy g:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Well the south side of Chicago
>>>>>>>>>Is the baddest part of town
>>>>>>>>>And if you go down there
>>>>>>>>>You better just beware
>>>>>>>>>Of a man named Leroy Brown
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Now Leroy more than trouble
>>>>>>>>>You see he stand about six foot four
>>>>>>>>>All the downtown ladies call him "treetop lover"
>>>>>>>>>All the men just call him "sir"
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>And it's bad, bad Leroy Brown
>>>>>>>>>The baddest man in the whole damn town
>>>>>>>>>Badder than old King Kong
>>>>>>>>>And meaner than a junkyard dog
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Now Leroy he a gambler
>>>>>>>>>And he like his fancy clothes
>>>>>>>>>And he like to wave his diamond rings
>>>>>>>>>In front of everybody's nose
>>>>>>>>>He got a custom Continental
>>>>>>>>>He got an Eldorado too
>>>>>>>>>He got a 32 gun in his pocket for fun
>>>>>>>>>He got a razor in his shoe
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>And it's bad, bad Leroy Brown
>>>>>>>>>The baddest man in the whole damn town
>>>>>>>>>Badder than old King Kong
>>>>>>>>>And meaner than a junkyard dog
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Well Friday bout a week ago
>>>>>>>>>Leroy shootin' dice
>>>>>>>>>And at the edge of the bar
>>>>>>>>>Sat a girl named Doris
>>>>>>>>>And ooh that girl looked nice
>>>>>>>>>Well he cast his eyes upon her
>>>>>>>>>And the trouble soon began
>>>>>>>>>And Leroy brown learned a lesson
>>>>>>>>>'Bout messin' with the wife of a jealous man
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>And it's bad, bad Leroy Brown
>>>>>>>>>The baddest man in the whole damned town
>>>>>>>>>Badder than old King Kong
>>>>>>>>>And meaner than a junkyard dog,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Well the two men took to fightin'
>>>>>>>>>And when they pulled them from the floor
>>>>>>>>>Leroy looked like a jigsaw puzzle
>>>>>>>>>With a couple of pieces gone
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>And it's bad, bad Leroy Brown
>>>>>>>>>The baddest man in the whole damn town
>>>>>>>>>Badder than old King Kong
>>>>>>>>>And meaner than a junkyard dog
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>i've never heard of thiss ong. it sounds like some crap from the 50"s.
>>>>>>>>u should, like, get more up to date and stuff dood.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>* 1973 *
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bad,_Bad_Leroy_Brown
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Number One
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>same thing lol. seventies was just like the fifftys except they were
>>>>>>wering plad and saying "groovy man" and "far out". good thing our
>>>>>>generation nows a thing or 2 about music.
>>>>>
>>>>>gee, i wonder where they learned it? Maybe we should have all just
>>>>>failed to develop anything regarding music or technology for a generation
>>>>>or two and seen what would have happened, ya think?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>i don"t think that's a very good suggestion, because stuff that happened
>>>>in the 50's influanced what happend in 60"s and seventes, and so on. we
>>>>r constanly lerning from our past, and to stifle an entire generation of
>>>>development whold devistate the generations to follow. look how much
>>>>we've developed on computers and war technolgy and especially pop music.
>>>>u've got some warped sencibilaties.
>>>>
>>>
>>>wow, ya think? So you're saying that's where they learned it? That's wild!
>>>Have you got some proof or anything or are you just making that up?
>>
>>
>> really? it seems a pretty simple concept 2 me, (and most people, at
>> that) but here u r, talking like u've just discovered it, and saying i'm
>> possibly "making [it] up." i mean, it's a pretty commonly accepted
>> theory: won thing leads to another, and all. i'm not suggesting post
>> hoc ergo propter hoc, but causality does seem to make some sense in
>> broad terms. i can probably provide scads of "proof" if it is actually
>> required of u, but come on man. seems a bit silly to doubt such a
>> thing.
>>
>
>Are you sure i said you're possibly making it up? I'm pretty sure that
>i only asked if proof was in your possession or if you had made it up.
>I don't normally make assertions in interrogatives and usually restrict
>the same for the normally intended purpose of information acquisition.

forgive me for "playing" with ur words. was that not what u were
implying with ur "question"? 2 can play at this game. i noticed u
avoided the issue entirely in ur response. telling. verry telling.

 

John "C" wrote:

> "??? rrock" <invalid@address.here> wrote in message
> news:47227e0b$0$32514$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
>
>>
>>John "C" wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"??? rrock" <invalid@address.here> wrote in message
>>>news:4721d297$0$24313$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
>>>
>>>
>>>>John "C" wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>"??? rrock" <invalid@address.here> wrote in message
>>>>>
>>>>>wavy g's number two fan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>wavy g's number won fan wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>John "C" is no match for wavy g:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>* 1973 *
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bad,_Bad_Leroy_Brown
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Number One
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>same thing lol. seventies was just like the fifftys except they were
>>>>>>>wering plad and saying "groovy man" and "far out". good thing our
>>>>>>>generation nows a thing or 2 about music.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>gee, i wonder where they learned it? Maybe we should have all just
>>>>>>failed to develop anything regarding music or technology for a
>>>
>>>generation
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>or two and seen what would have happened, ya think? Anyone seen my
>>>
>>>"plad"
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>bells around? They're a sort of blue, you can't miss them.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>I had a Leisure Suit.
>>>>>
>>>>>I can say that the late 60s and early 70s were like a tampex:
>>>>>
>>>>>"In the groove, Up tight, and outta sight"!
>>>>>
>>>>>Number One
>>>>>--
>>>>>
>>>>>Art Deco [Labor and delivery]:
>>>>>
>>>>>http://www.jibjab.com/view/145814
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>late 60's early 70's were more like afros & picks, long side-burns,
>>>>STRIPES!!! people BIG on stipes, what else, high-heeled "shoes",
>>>>leather boots, macrame tops, "the dry look" (lololol), square belts
>>>
>>>buckles
>>>
>>>
>>>>with two holes instead of one, Gran Torino and the Stang MkIII, disco,
>>>>Peace with Honor, Raquel Welch, Maxi-skirts, MOOG synthesizers, ...
>>>
>>>
>>>I sure liked the Raquel Welch part of that era.
>>>
>>>Number One
>>>
>>
>>God yes. Sophia Loren was just starting to fade. I still don't remember
>>"plad" though, lol, except flannel shirts for huntn, etc., nothing to
>>be era specific about, really.
>
>
> Then Twiggy came along and ruined the "Big Boobs Look" because she didn't
> have any!
>
> Number One
>
>

lol, it wasn't just her. Did you forget Rowan & Martin's Laugh-In and the
skinny blonde that rose to semi-stardom from the humble beginnings as a
piece of cheese-cake?

--

Гордый Спонсор Ангела Смерти и ее Легионов Сестер
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.angels/msg/2f5df80dfa199b93

The Parapraxis League of the Clueless needs donations
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.angels/msg/06dbb46ae3c920b6?dmode=source

Support the Mother's Against Stalker Gay-Queer Worms Association
Give generously! http://deadbeef.lol33ta.com/DeadBeef

 

wavy g's number won fan wrote:

> ??? rrock is no match for wavy g:
>
>
>>
>>wavy g's number won fan wrote:
>>
>>
>>>??? rrock is no match for wavy g:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>wavy g's number won fan wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>??? rrock is no match for wavy g:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>wavy g's number won fan wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>John "C" is no match for wavy g:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"wavy g's number won fan" <numberwonfan@wavyg.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>news:naq1i3l11kteoagvja0pm0vudl2f5gpsir@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Nomen Nescio is no match for wavy g:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Well the south side of Chicago
>>>>>>>>>>Is the baddest part of town
>>>>>>>>>>And if you go down there
>>>>>>>>>>You better just beware
>>>>>>>>>>Of a man named Leroy Brown
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Now Leroy more than trouble
>>>>>>>>>>You see he stand about six foot four
>>>>>>>>>>All the downtown ladies call him "treetop lover"
>>>>>>>>>>All the men just call him "sir"
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>And it's bad, bad Leroy Brown
>>>>>>>>>>The baddest man in the whole damn town
>>>>>>>>>>Badder than old King Kong
>>>>>>>>>>And meaner than a junkyard dog
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Now Leroy he a gambler
>>>>>>>>>>And he like his fancy clothes
>>>>>>>>>>And he like to wave his diamond rings
>>>>>>>>>>In front of everybody's nose
>>>>>>>>>>He got a custom Continental
>>>>>>>>>>He got an Eldorado too
>>>>>>>>>>He got a 32 gun in his pocket for fun
>>>>>>>>>>He got a razor in his shoe
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>And it's bad, bad Leroy Brown
>>>>>>>>>>The baddest man in the whole damn town
>>>>>>>>>>Badder than old King Kong
>>>>>>>>>>And meaner than a junkyard dog
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Well Friday bout a week ago
>>>>>>>>>>Leroy shootin' dice
>>>>>>>>>>And at the edge of the bar
>>>>>>>>>>Sat a girl named Doris
>>>>>>>>>>And ooh that girl looked nice
>>>>>>>>>>Well he cast his eyes upon her
>>>>>>>>>>And the trouble soon began
>>>>>>>>>>And Leroy brown learned a lesson
>>>>>>>>>>'Bout messin' with the wife of a jealous man
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>And it's bad, bad Leroy Brown
>>>>>>>>>>The baddest man in the whole damned town
>>>>>>>>>>Badder than old King Kong
>>>>>>>>>>And meaner than a junkyard dog,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Well the two men took to fightin'
>>>>>>>>>>And when they pulled them from the floor
>>>>>>>>>>Leroy looked like a jigsaw puzzle
>>>>>>>>>>With a couple of pieces gone
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>And it's bad, bad Leroy Brown
>>>>>>>>>>The baddest man in the whole damn town
>>>>>>>>>>Badder than old King Kong
>>>>>>>>>>And meaner than a junkyard dog
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>i've never heard of thiss ong. it sounds like some crap from the 50"s.
>>>>>>>>>u should, like, get more up to date and stuff dood.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>* 1973 *
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bad,_Bad_Leroy_Brown
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Number One
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>same thing lol. seventies was just like the fifftys except they were
>>>>>>>wering plad and saying "groovy man" and "far out". good thing our
>>>>>>>generation nows a thing or 2 about music.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>gee, i wonder where they learned it? Maybe we should have all just
>>>>>>failed to develop anything regarding music or technology for a generation
>>>>>>or two and seen what would have happened, ya think?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>i don"t think that's a very good suggestion, because stuff that happened
>>>>>in the 50's influanced what happend in 60"s and seventes, and so on. we
>>>>>r constanly lerning from our past, and to stifle an entire generation of
>>>>>development whold devistate the generations to follow. look how much
>>>>>we've developed on computers and war technolgy and especially pop music.
>>>>>u've got some warped sencibilaties.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>wow, ya think? So you're saying that's where they learned it? That's wild!
>>>>Have you got some proof or anything or are you just making that up?
>>>
>>>
>>>really? it seems a pretty simple concept 2 me, (and most people, at
>>>that) but here u r, talking like u've just discovered it, and saying i'm
>>>possibly "making [it] up." i mean, it's a pretty commonly accepted
>>>theory: won thing leads to another, and all. i'm not suggesting post
>>>hoc ergo propter hoc, but causality does seem to make some sense in
>>>broad terms. i can probably provide scads of "proof" if it is actually
>>>required of u, but come on man. seems a bit silly to doubt such a
>>>thing.
>>>
>>
>>Are you sure i said you're possibly making it up? I'm pretty sure that
>>i only asked if proof was in your possession or if you had made it up.
>>I don't normally make assertions in interrogatives and usually restrict
>>the same for the normally intended purpose of information acquisition.
>
>
> forgive me for "playing" with ur words. was that not what u were
> implying with ur "question"? 2 can play at this game. i noticed u
> avoided the issue entirely in ur response. telling. verry telling.

As stated previously, i normally restrict the use of interrogatives to
their normally intended purpose of information acquisition. Therefore,
the answer to your first question should be obvious since there wasn't
any sort of implication made in my question. In any case, you still
haven't answered my original question. If you find that there is a lag
of time for delivery of the information you seek from me, perhaps you
should consider your own initial failure as the cause. Typically, most
human interaction with me results in the delivery of relatively large
amounts of information, but occasionally due to deviations from the
mean in a given population, there are some human interactions that
fail to produce anything constructive. The choice, is yours.


--

?????? ??????? ?????? ?????? ? ?? ???????? ??????
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.angels/msg/2f5df80dfa199b93

The Parapraxis League of the Clueless needs donations
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.angels/msg/06dbb46ae3c920b6?dmode=source

Support the Mother's Against Stalker Gay-Queer Worms Association
Give generously! http://deadbeef.lol33ta.com/DeadBeef

 

"??? rrock" <invalid@address.here> wrote in message
news:47228770$0$26362$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
>
>
> John "C" wrote:
>
> > "??? rrock" <invalid@address.here> wrote in message
> > news:47227e0b$0$32514$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
> >
> >>
> >>John "C" wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>"??? rrock" <invalid@address.here> wrote in message
> >>>news:4721d297$0$24313$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>John "C" wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>"??? rrock" <invalid@address.here> wrote in message
> >>>>>
> >>>>>wavy g's number two fan wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>wavy g's number won fan wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>John "C" is no match for wavy g:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>* 1973 *
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bad,_Bad_Leroy_Brown
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>Number One
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>same thing lol. seventies was just like the fifftys except they
were
> >>>>>>>wering plad and saying "groovy man" and "far out". good thing our
> >>>>>>>generation nows a thing or 2 about music.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>gee, i wonder where they learned it? Maybe we should have all just
> >>>>>>failed to develop anything regarding music or technology for a
> >>>
> >>>generation
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>or two and seen what would have happened, ya think? Anyone seen my
> >>>
> >>>"plad"
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>bells around? They're a sort of blue, you can't miss them.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>I had a Leisure Suit.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>I can say that the late 60s and early 70s were like a tampex:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>"In the groove, Up tight, and outta sight"!
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Number One
> >>>>>--
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Art Deco [Labor and delivery]:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>http://www.jibjab.com/view/145814
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>late 60's early 70's were more like afros & picks, long side-burns,
> >>>>STRIPES!!! people BIG on stipes, what else, high-heeled "shoes",
> >>>>leather boots, macrame tops, "the dry look" (lololol), square belts
> >>>
> >>>buckles
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>with two holes instead of one, Gran Torino and the Stang MkIII, disco,
> >>>>Peace with Honor, Raquel Welch, Maxi-skirts, MOOG synthesizers, ...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>I sure liked the Raquel Welch part of that era.
> >>>
> >>>Number One
> >>>
> >>
> >>God yes. Sophia Loren was just starting to fade. I still don't remember
> >>"plad" though, lol, except flannel shirts for huntn, etc., nothing to
> >>be era specific about, really.
> >
> >
> > Then Twiggy came along and ruined the "Big Boobs Look" because she
didn't
> > have any!
> >
> > Number One
> >
> >
>
> lol, it wasn't just her. Did you forget Rowan & Martin's Laugh-In and the
> skinny blonde that rose to semi-stardom from the humble beginnings as a
> piece of cheese-cake?

Despite having "No Boobs", she gave me a B.V.T.!!!

Number One

 

John "C" wrote:

> "??? rrock" <invalid@address.here> wrote in message
> news:47228770$0$26362$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
>
>>
>>John "C" wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"??? rrock" <invalid@address.here> wrote in message
>>>news:47227e0b$0$32514$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
>>>
>>>
>>>>John "C" wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>"??? rrock" <invalid@address.here> wrote in message
>>>>>news:4721d297$0$24313$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>John "C" wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"??? rrock" <invalid@address.here> wrote in message
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>wavy g's number two fan wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>wavy g's number won fan wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>John "C" is no match for wavy g:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>* 1973 *
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bad,_Bad_Leroy_Brown
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Number One
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>same thing lol. seventies was just like the fifftys except they
>
> were
>
>>>>>>>>>wering plad and saying "groovy man" and "far out". good thing our
>>>>>>>>>generation nows a thing or 2 about music.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>gee, i wonder where they learned it? Maybe we should have all just
>>>>>>>>failed to develop anything regarding music or technology for a
>>>>>
>>>>>generation
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>or two and seen what would have happened, ya think? Anyone seen my
>>>>>
>>>>>"plad"
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>bells around? They're a sort of blue, you can't miss them.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I had a Leisure Suit.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I can say that the late 60s and early 70s were like a tampex:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"In the groove, Up tight, and outta sight"!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Number One
>>>>>>>--
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Art Deco [Labor and delivery]:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>http://www.jibjab.com/view/145814
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>late 60's early 70's were more like afros & picks, long side-burns,
>>>>>>STRIPES!!! people BIG on stipes, what else, high-heeled "shoes",
>>>>>>leather boots, macrame tops, "the dry look" (lololol), square belts
>>>>>
>>>>>buckles
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>with two holes instead of one, Gran Torino and the Stang MkIII, disco,
>>>>>>Peace with Honor, Raquel Welch, Maxi-skirts, MOOG synthesizers, ...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>I sure liked the Raquel Welch part of that era.
>>>>>
>>>>>Number One
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>God yes. Sophia Loren was just starting to fade. I still don't remember
>>>>"plad" though, lol, except flannel shirts for huntn, etc., nothing to
>>>>be era specific about, really.
>>>
>>>
>>>Then Twiggy came along and ruined the "Big Boobs Look" because she
>
> didn't
>
>>>have any!
>>>
>>>Number One
>>>
>>>
>>
>>lol, it wasn't just her. Did you forget Rowan & Martin's Laugh-In and the
>>skinny blonde that rose to semi-stardom from the humble beginnings as a
>>piece of cheese-cake?
>
>
> Despite having "No Boobs", she gave me a B.V.T.!!!
>
> Number One
>

BVT? ... and... diff question... Goldie? or Twiggy? I thought twiggy
was a joke, myself, go figure. Check your e-mail.


--
?????? ??????? ?????? ?????? ? ?? ???????? ??????
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.angels/msg/2f5df80dfa199b93

The Parapraxis League of the Clueless needs donations
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.angels/msg/06dbb46ae3c920b6?dmode=source

Support the Mother's Against Stalker Gay-Queer Worms Association
Give generously! http://deadbeef.lol33ta.com/DeadBeef

 

??? rrock is no match for wavy g:

>
>
>wavy g's number won fan wrote:
>
>> ??? rrock is no match for wavy g:
>>
>>
>>>
>>>wavy g's number won fan wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>??? rrock is no match for wavy g:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>wavy g's number won fan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>??? rrock is no match for wavy g:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>wavy g's number won fan wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>John "C" is no match for wavy g:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>"wavy g's number won fan" <numberwonfan@wavyg.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>news:naq1i3l11kteoagvja0pm0vudl2f5gpsir@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Nomen Nescio is no match for wavy g:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Well the south side of Chicago
>>>>>>>>>>>Is the baddest part of town
>>>>>>>>>>>And if you go down there
>>>>>>>>>>>You better just beware
>>>>>>>>>>>Of a man named Leroy Brown
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Now Leroy more than trouble
>>>>>>>>>>>You see he stand about six foot four
>>>>>>>>>>>All the downtown ladies call him "treetop lover"
>>>>>>>>>>>All the men just call him "sir"
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>And it's bad, bad Leroy Brown
>>>>>>>>>>>The baddest man in the whole damn town
>>>>>>>>>>>Badder than old King Kong
>>>>>>>>>>>And meaner than a junkyard dog
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Now Leroy he a gambler
>>>>>>>>>>>And he like his fancy clothes
>>>>>>>>>>>And he like to wave his diamond rings
>>>>>>>>>>>In front of everybody's nose
>>>>>>>>>>>He got a custom Continental
>>>>>>>>>>>He got an Eldorado too
>>>>>>>>>>>He got a 32 gun in his pocket for fun
>>>>>>>>>>>He got a razor in his shoe
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>And it's bad, bad Leroy Brown
>>>>>>>>>>>The baddest man in the whole damn town
>>>>>>>>>>>Badder than old King Kong
>>>>>>>>>>>And meaner than a junkyard dog
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Well Friday bout a week ago
>>>>>>>>>>>Leroy shootin' dice
>>>>>>>>>>>And at the edge of the bar
>>>>>>>>>>>Sat a girl named Doris
>>>>>>>>>>>And ooh that girl looked nice
>>>>>>>>>>>Well he cast his eyes upon her
>>>>>>>>>>>And the trouble soon began
>>>>>>>>>>>And Leroy brown learned a lesson
>>>>>>>>>>>'Bout messin' with the wife of a jealous man
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>And it's bad, bad Leroy Brown
>>>>>>>>>>>The baddest man in the whole damned town
>>>>>>>>>>>Badder than old King Kong
>>>>>>>>>>>And meaner than a junkyard dog,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Well the two men took to fightin'
>>>>>>>>>>>And when they pulled them from the floor
>>>>>>>>>>>Leroy looked like a jigsaw puzzle
>>>>>>>>>>>With a couple of pieces gone
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>And it's bad, bad Leroy Brown
>>>>>>>>>>>The baddest man in the whole damn town
>>>>>>>>>>>Badder than old King Kong
>>>>>>>>>>>And meaner than a junkyard dog
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>i've never heard of thiss ong. it sounds like some crap from the 50"s.
>>>>>>>>>>u should, like, get more up to date and stuff dood.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>* 1973 *
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bad,_Bad_Leroy_Brown
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Number One
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>same thing lol. seventies was just like the fifftys except they were
>>>>>>>>wering plad and saying "groovy man" and "far out". good thing our
>>>>>>>>generation nows a thing or 2 about music.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>gee, i wonder where they learned it? Maybe we should have all just
>>>>>>>failed to develop anything regarding music or technology for a generation
>>>>>>>or two and seen what would have happened, ya think?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>i don"t think that's a very good suggestion, because stuff that happened
>>>>>>in the 50's influanced what happend in 60"s and seventes, and so on. we
>>>>>>r constanly lerning from our past, and to stifle an entire generation of
>>>>>>development whold devistate the generations to follow. look how much
>>>>>>we've developed on computers and war technolgy and especially pop music.
>>>>>>u've got some warped sencibilaties.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>wow, ya think? So you're saying that's where they learned it? That's wild!
>>>>>Have you got some proof or anything or are you just making that up?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>really? it seems a pretty simple concept 2 me, (and most people, at
>>>>that) but here u r, talking like u've just discovered it, and saying i'm
>>>>possibly "making [it] up." i mean, it's a pretty commonly accepted
>>>>theory: won thing leads to another, and all. i'm not suggesting post
>>>>hoc ergo propter hoc, but causality does seem to make some sense in
>>>>broad terms. i can probably provide scads of "proof" if it is actually
>>>>required of u, but come on man. seems a bit silly to doubt such a
>>>>thing.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Are you sure i said you're possibly making it up? I'm pretty sure that
>>>i only asked if proof was in your possession or if you had made it up.
>>>I don't normally make assertions in interrogatives and usually restrict
>>>the same for the normally intended purpose of information acquisition.
>>
>>
>> forgive me for "playing" with ur words. was that not what u were
>> implying with ur "question"? 2 can play at this game. i noticed u
>> avoided the issue entirely in ur response. telling. verry telling.
>
>As stated previously, i normally restrict the use of interrogatives to
>their normally intended purpose of information acquisition. Therefore,
>the answer to your first question should be obvious since there wasn't
>any sort of implication made in my question. In any case, you still
>haven't answered my original question. If you find that there is a lag
>of time for delivery of the information you seek from me, perhaps you
>should consider your own initial failure as the cause. Typically, most
>human interaction with me results in the delivery of relatively large
>amounts of information, but occasionally due to deviations from the
>mean in a given population, there are some human interactions that
>fail to produce anything constructive. The choice, is yours.

there must be some reason 4 asking the particular question u asked,
hence my repsonce. i could ask u "how do u properly dispose of a human
body in hidden ur mom's basement?" what would ur thought be if i asked
that? ur first assumption would probably be that i'm asking that
particular question because i've got a body buried in my mom's basement
and i want to get rid of it. i must have a reason 4 asking the
question, see. the reason: its starting to stink and ppl r coming
around questioning my mother. see? theyre is a reason i asked u that
question.

the same goes for ur question. i stated (in response to a poor
suggestion by another unfortuneate poster) that the fifties influenced
the sixties which, in turn, influenced the seventies (and so on). u
responded "have you got some proof or anything or are you just making
that up?" see, that led me to believe that u didn't know about (and
had never even scrutinized) a very obvious concept. i will go on to
point out that right before ur question, u exclaimed "that's wild!" this
suggests 2 me that this is a new concept 2 u, pointed out by me.

so hear we r. i've got u backed into a logical corner. i will ask u
again 2 explain urself 4 ur questioning. u can dance around the issues
at hand all u want, but in the end, i will be dancing circles around u,
logically.

 

"??? rrock" <invalid@address.here> wrote in message

> BVT? ... and... diff question... Goldie? or Twiggy? I thought twiggy
> was a joke, myself, go figure. Check your e-mail.

Goldie Hawn. Twiggy was a joke. Judy Carne wasn't bad either!

Number One
--
Art Deco [Labor and delivery]:

http://www.jibjab.com/view/145814

 

wavy g's number won fan wrote:

> rrock is no match for wavy g:
>
>
>>
>>wavy g's number won fan wrote:
>>
>>
>>> rrock is no match for wavy g:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>wavy g's number won fan wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> rrock is no match for wavy g:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>wavy g's number won fan wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> rrock is no match for wavy g:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>wavy g's number won fan wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>John "C" is no match for wavy g:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>"wavy g's number won fan" <numberwonfan@wavyg.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>news:naq1i3l11kteoagvja0pm0vudl2f5gpsir@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Nomen Nescio is no match for wavy g:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Well the south side of Chicago
>>>>>>>>>>>>Is the baddest part of town
>>>>>>>>>>>>And if you go down there
>>>>>>>>>>>>You better just beware
>>>>>>>>>>>>Of a man named Leroy Brown
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Now Leroy more than trouble
>>>>>>>>>>>>You see he stand about six foot four
>>>>>>>>>>>>All the downtown ladies call him "treetop lover"
>>>>>>>>>>>>All the men just call him "sir"
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>And it's bad, bad Leroy Brown
>>>>>>>>>>>>The baddest man in the whole damn town
>>>>>>>>>>>>Badder than old King Kong
>>>>>>>>>>>>And meaner than a junkyard dog
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Now Leroy he a gambler
>>>>>>>>>>>>And he like his fancy clothes
>>>>>>>>>>>>And he like to wave his diamond rings
>>>>>>>>>>>>In front of everybody's nose
>>>>>>>>>>>>He got a custom Continental
>>>>>>>>>>>>He got an Eldorado too
>>>>>>>>>>>>He got a 32 gun in his pocket for fun
>>>>>>>>>>>>He got a razor in his shoe
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>And it's bad, bad Leroy Brown
>>>>>>>>>>>>The baddest man in the whole damn town
>>>>>>>>>>>>Badder than old King Kong
>>>>>>>>>>>>And meaner than a junkyard dog
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Well Friday bout a week ago
>>>>>>>>>>>>Leroy shootin' dice
>>>>>>>>>>>>And at the edge of the bar
>>>>>>>>>>>>Sat a girl named Doris
>>>>>>>>>>>>And ooh that girl looked nice
>>>>>>>>>>>>Well he cast his eyes upon her
>>>>>>>>>>>>And the trouble soon began
>>>>>>>>>>>>And Leroy brown learned a lesson
>>>>>>>>>>>>'Bout messin' with the wife of a jealous man
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>And it's bad, bad Leroy Brown
>>>>>>>>>>>>The baddest man in the whole damned town
>>>>>>>>>>>>Badder than old King Kong
>>>>>>>>>>>>And meaner than a junkyard dog,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Well the two men took to fightin'
>>>>>>>>>>>>And when they pulled them from the floor
>>>>>>>>>>>>Leroy looked like a jigsaw puzzle
>>>>>>>>>>>>With a couple of pieces gone
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>And it's bad, bad Leroy Brown
>>>>>>>>>>>>The baddest man in the whole damn town
>>>>>>>>>>>>Badder than old King Kong
>>>>>>>>>>>>And meaner than a junkyard dog
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>i've never heard of thiss ong. it sounds like some crap from the 50"s.
>>>>>>>>>>>u should, like, get more up to date and stuff dood.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>* 1973 *
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bad,_Bad_Leroy_Brown
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Number One
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>same thing lol. seventies was just like the fifftys except they were
>>>>>>>>>wering plad and saying "groovy man" and "far out". good thing our
>>>>>>>>>generation nows a thing or 2 about music.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>gee, i wonder where they learned it? Maybe we should have all just
>>>>>>>>failed to develop anything regarding music or technology for a generation
>>>>>>>>or two and seen what would have happened, ya think?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>i don"t think that's a very good suggestion, because stuff that happened
>>>>>>>in the 50's influanced what happend in 60"s and seventes, and so on. we
>>>>>>>r constanly lerning from our past, and to stifle an entire generation of
>>>>>>>development whold devistate the generations to follow. look how much
>>>>>>>we've developed on computers and war technolgy and especially pop music.
>>>>>>>u've got some warped sencibilaties.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>wow, ya think? So you're saying that's where they learned it? That's wild!
>>>>>>Have you got some proof or anything or are you just making that up?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>really? it seems a pretty simple concept 2 me, (and most people, at
>>>>>that) but here u r, talking like u've just discovered it, and saying i'm
>>>>>possibly "making [it] up." i mean, it's a pretty commonly accepted
>>>>>theory: won thing leads to another, and all. i'm not suggesting post
>>>>>hoc ergo propter hoc, but causality does seem to make some sense in
>>>>>broad terms. i can probably provide scads of "proof" if it is actually
>>>>>required of u, but come on man. seems a bit silly to doubt such a
>>>>>thing.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Are you sure i said you're possibly making it up? I'm pretty sure that
>>>>i only asked if proof was in your possession or if you had made it up.
>>>>I don't normally make assertions in interrogatives and usually restrict
>>>>the same for the normally intended purpose of information acquisition.
>>>
>>>
>>>forgive me for "playing" with ur words. was that not what u were
>>>implying with ur "question"? 2 can play at this game. i noticed u
>>>avoided the issue entirely in ur response. telling. verry telling.
>>
>>As stated previously, i normally restrict the use of interrogatives to
>>their normally intended purpose of information acquisition. Therefore,
>>the answer to your first question should be obvious since there wasn't
>>any sort of implication made in my question. In any case, you still
>>haven't answered my original question. If you find that there is a lag
>>of time for delivery of the information you seek from me, perhaps you
>>should consider your own initial failure as the cause. Typically, most
>>human interaction with me results in the delivery of relatively large
>>amounts of information, but occasionally due to deviations from the
>>mean in a given population, there are some human interactions that
>>fail to produce anything constructive. The choice, is yours.
>
>
> there must be some reason 4 asking the particular question u asked,
> hence my repsonce. i could ask u "how do u properly dispose of a human
> body in hidden ur mom's basement?" what would ur thought be if i asked
> that? ur first assumption would probably be that i'm asking that
> particular question because i've got a body buried in my mom's basement
> and i want to get rid of it. i must have a reason 4 asking the
> question, see. the reason: its starting to stink and ppl r coming
> around questioning my mother. see? theyre is a reason i asked u that
> question.
>
> the same goes for ur question. i stated (in response to a poor
> suggestion by another unfortuneate poster) that the fifties influenced
> the sixties which, in turn, influenced the seventies (and so on). u
> responded "have you got some proof or anything or are you just making
> that up?" see, that led me to believe that u didn't know about (and
> had never even scrutinized) a very obvious concept. i will go on to
> point out that right before ur question, u exclaimed "that's wild!" this
> suggests 2 me that this is a new concept 2 u, pointed out by me.
>
> so hear we r. i've got u backed into a logical corner. i will ask u
> again 2 explain urself 4 ur questioning. u can dance around the issues
> at hand all u want, but in the end, i will be dancing circles around u,
> logically.

Although you have made quite a few assumptions in your treatise above, it
nevertheless has again failed to answer my original question in the least.
Explaining why you made assumptions about a question is not the same as
simply answering the question. Again, you have asked several questions
in the above, but there isn't the slightest amount of inclination within
me to answer any of them since my own original question has yet to be
resolved on your part. As a normal customary procedure for the purpose
of an optimal use of available time, you have only three more posts to
do so before this conversation will be unilaterally determined to be
a failure to produce anything constructive, and promptly cease.

--
} else (void)handle_error(HERE,error,"initializing TCP/IP");
?????? ??????? ?????? ?????? ? ?? ???????? ??????
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.angels/msg/2f5df80dfa199b93

The Parapraxis League of the Clueless needs donations
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.angels/msg/06dbb46ae3c920b6?dmode=source

Support the Mother's Against Stalker Gay-Queer Worms Association
Give generously! http://deadbeef.lol33ta.com/DeadBeef

 

"??? rrock" <invalid@address.here> wrote in message

> Check your e-mail.

Sekret info sent.

No. 1

 

??? rrock is no match for wavy g:

>
>
>wavy g's number won fan wrote:
>
>> ??? rrock is no match for wavy g:
>>
>>
>>>
>>>wavy g's number won fan wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>??? rrock is no match for wavy g:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>wavy g's number won fan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>??? rrock is no match for wavy g:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>wavy g's number won fan wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>??? rrock is no match for wavy g:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>wavy g's number won fan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>John "C" is no match for wavy g:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>"wavy g's number won fan" <numberwonfan@wavyg.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>news:naq1i3l11kteoagvja0pm0vudl2f5gpsir@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Nomen Nescio is no match for wavy g:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Well the south side of Chicago
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Is the baddest part of town
>>>>>>>>>>>>>And if you go down there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>You better just beware
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Of a man named Leroy Brown
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Now Leroy more than trouble
>>>>>>>>>>>>>You see he stand about six foot four
>>>>>>>>>>>>>All the downtown ladies call him "treetop lover"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>All the men just call him "sir"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>And it's bad, bad Leroy Brown
>>>>>>>>>>>>>The baddest man in the whole damn town
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Badder than old King Kong
>>>>>>>>>>>>>And meaner than a junkyard dog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Now Leroy he a gambler
>>>>>>>>>>>>>And he like his fancy clothes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>And he like to wave his diamond rings
>>>>>>>>>>>>>In front of everybody's nose
>>>>>>>>>>>>>He got a custom Continental
>>>>>>>>>>>>>He got an Eldorado too
>>>>>>>>>>>>>He got a 32 gun in his pocket for fun
>>>>>>>>>>>>>He got a razor in his shoe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>And it's bad, bad Leroy Brown
>>>>>>>>>>>>>The baddest man in the whole damn town
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Badder than old King Kong
>>>>>>>>>>>>>And meaner than a junkyard dog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Well Friday bout a week ago
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Leroy shootin' dice
>>>>>>>>>>>>>And at the edge of the bar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Sat a girl named Doris
>>>>>>>>>>>>>And ooh that girl looked nice
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Well he cast his eyes upon her
>>>>>>>>>>>>>And the trouble soon began
>>>>>>>>>>>>>And Leroy brown learned a lesson
>>>>>>>>>>>>>'Bout messin' with the wife of a jealous man
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>And it's bad, bad Leroy Brown
>>>>>>>>>>>>>The baddest man in the whole damned town
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Badder than old King Kong
>>>>>>>>>>>>>And meaner than a junkyard dog,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Well the two men took to fightin'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>And when they pulled them from the floor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Leroy looked like a jigsaw puzzle
>>>>>>>>>>>>>With a couple of pieces gone
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>And it's bad, bad Leroy Brown
>>>>>>>>>>>>>The baddest man in the whole damn town
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Badder than old King Kong
>>>>>>>>>>>>>And meaner than a junkyard dog
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>i've never heard of thiss ong. it sounds like some crap from the 50"s.
>>>>>>>>>>>>u should, like, get more up to date and stuff dood.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>* 1973 *
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bad,_Bad_Leroy_Brown
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Number One
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>same thing lol. seventies was just like the fifftys except they were
>>>>>>>>>>wering plad and saying "groovy man" and "far out". good thing our
>>>>>>>>>>generation nows a thing or 2 about music.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>gee, i wonder where they learned it? Maybe we should have all just
>>>>>>>>>failed to develop anything regarding music or technology for a generation
>>>>>>>>>or two and seen what would have happened, ya think?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>i don"t think that's a very good suggestion, because stuff that happened
>>>>>>>>in the 50's influanced what happend in 60"s and seventes, and so on. we
>>>>>>>>r constanly lerning from our past, and to stifle an entire generation of
>>>>>>>>development whold devistate the generations to follow. look how much
>>>>>>>>we've developed on computers and war technolgy and especially pop music.
>>>>>>>>u've got some warped sencibilaties.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>wow, ya think? So you're saying that's where they learned it? That's wild!
>>>>>>>Have you got some proof or anything or are you just making that up?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>really? it seems a pretty simple concept 2 me, (and most people, at
>>>>>>that) but here u r, talking like u've just discovered it, and saying i'm
>>>>>>possibly "making [it] up." i mean, it's a pretty commonly accepted
>>>>>>theory: won thing leads to another, and all. i'm not suggesting post
>>>>>>hoc ergo propter hoc, but causality does seem to make some sense in
>>>>>>broad terms. i can probably provide scads of "proof" if it is actually
>>>>>>required of u, but come on man. seems a bit silly to doubt such a
>>>>>>thing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Are you sure i said you're possibly making it up? I'm pretty sure that
>>>>>i only asked if proof was in your possession or if you had made it up.
>>>>>I don't normally make assertions in interrogatives and usually restrict
>>>>>the same for the normally intended purpose of information acquisition.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>forgive me for "playing" with ur words. was that not what u were
>>>>implying with ur "question"? 2 can play at this game. i noticed u
>>>>avoided the issue entirely in ur response. telling. verry telling.
>>>
>>>As stated previously, i normally restrict the use of interrogatives to
>>>their normally intended purpose of information acquisition. Therefore,
>>>the answer to your first question should be obvious since there wasn't
>>>any sort of implication made in my question. In any case, you still
>>>haven't answered my original question. If you find that there is a lag
>>>of time for delivery of the information you seek from me, perhaps you
>>>should consider your own initial failure as the cause. Typically, most
>>>human interaction with me results in the delivery of relatively large
>>>amounts of information, but occasionally due to deviations from the
>>>mean in a given population, there are some human interactions that
>>>fail to produce anything constructive. The choice, is yours.
>>
>>
>> there must be some reason 4 asking the particular question u asked,
>> hence my repsonce. i could ask u "how do u properly dispose of a human
>> body in hidden ur mom's basement?" what would ur thought be if i asked
>> that? ur first assumption would probably be that i'm asking that
>> particular question because i've got a body buried in my mom's basement
>> and i want to get rid of it. i must have a reason 4 asking the
>> question, see. the reason: its starting to stink and ppl r coming
>> around questioning my mother. see? theyre is a reason i asked u that
>> question.
>>
>> the same goes for ur question. i stated (in response to a poor
>> suggestion by another unfortuneate poster) that the fifties influenced
>> the sixties which, in turn, influenced the seventies (and so on). u
>> responded "have you got some proof or anything or are you just making
>> that up?" see, that led me to believe that u didn't know about (and
>> had never even scrutinized) a very obvious concept. i will go on to
>> point out that right before ur question, u exclaimed "that's wild!" this
>> suggests 2 me that this is a new concept 2 u, pointed out by me.
>>
>> so hear we r. i've got u backed into a logical corner. i will ask u
>> again 2 explain urself 4 ur questioning. u can dance around the issues
>> at hand all u want, but in the end, i will be dancing circles around u,
>> logically.
>
>Although you have made quite a few assumptions in your treatise above, it
>nevertheless has again failed to answer my original question in the least.
>Explaining why you made assumptions about a question is not the same as
>simply answering the question. Again, you have asked several questions
>in the above, but there isn't the slightest amount of inclination within
>me to answer any of them since my own original question has yet to be
>resolved on your part. As a normal customary procedure for the purpose
>of an optimal use of available time, you have only three more posts to
>do so before this conversation will be unilaterally determined to be
>a failure to produce anything constructive, and promptly cease.

ur asking me 2 prove whether or not earlier generations influence
generations to follow? i'm sorry, but do u see oddity of a question
like this? this only leads to won (1) responce from me, and the
entirety of the "internet" community reading this right now: "omg!"

ok, well, in the best interest of diplomacy, i will do my best 2 provide
u an example of the argument i have presented (albeit, in protest; i
can't believe somewon still has doubts about such a concept). here we
go: john lennon of the "beatles" (arguablly won [1] of the most
infulential bands of the sixties) has cited buddy holly (a popular "rock
and roll" singing artist of the fifties) as won (1) of his early
influences. see how that works? things in the past influence the
things that follow. this is called "causality" and it"s the way the
universe works.

now that i have provided u with proof of an obvious concept that has
already been showered upon u ur entire life, u see that i have tricked u
into admitting that ur mind is an informational raincoat, and that the
music of brittany spears and justin timberlake is far superior 2 that of
ur generation. i win! end of debate!!!