Read more: http://foxnewsinsider.com/2013/06/23/judge-jeanine-why-did-irs-receive-millions-our-money#ixzz2X5NXJJTCThsi must be proof that they really need those $70M bonuses!
Mercy! Yet another scandal. We need a spreadsheet to start tracking these things. This is getting ridiculous.
And how many of the multiple scandals have fallen away into nothingness? Well outside of the Right-wing circle jerk anyway where no "scandal" ever dies the death it deserves and no conspiracy theory, no matter how crazy, ever is let go? Answer: All of them! But keep trying, they do make you fools look even more foolish. Lets see, there was the birth certificate conspiracy, the death panel conspiracy, the Benghazi conspiracy (which was actually 3 separate scandals), the IRS scandal, the fast and furious conspiracy, Solyndra, The AP scandal, oh the list goes on and on and nothing ever comes of them. Please just add this to the list and let us know when the next Fox inspired Glenn Beck nonsense comes along. We'll hold our breath. Right!
Rather than claiming they've "fallen away" it might be more appropriate to say they've been replaced with additional scandals.
Obama's IRS sent 24,000 refunds to the same address? Yeah, why not give the agency the add'l responsibility to oversee our healthcare...I'm sure it make perfect sense to the libs.
Lets see: The "birth certificate" wasn't a scandal and the "death panel" and "Solyndra" weren't scandals, just bad policy, so knock those off your list. The true scandals are Fast and Furious, Benghazi, IRS, AP and NSA. None of these have disappeared and are still quite prominent contrary to what you say. When deaths are involved (F and F, Benghazi) and when our Constitutional rights have been violated, people tend to demand answers which, so far, have not been forthcoming from this administration. Here are some fairly recent articles you might enjoy regarding the scandals which certainly don't seem to be going away any time soon: Fast and Furious (from May 21, 2013): http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-05-21/fast-and-furious-scandal-returns-to-haunt-obama Benghazi (from May 20, 2013): http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/benghazi-scandal-grows_722032.html IRS (from May 19, 2013): http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324767004578487332636180800.html AP (from May 20, 2013): http://www.aclu.org/blog/national-s...ee-speech/ap-phone-records-scandal-highlights NSA (from June 12, 2013): http://www.nationalreview.com/article/350798/nsa-scandal-derek-satya-khanna
And may I add, just because MSNBC & the democrap underground stop talking about a subject, it hasn't necessarily fallen away. The primary strategy in most upcoming political races involves the dem candidates being able to distance themselves from the current admin.
And they just keep going like the energizer bunny. Please just let us know when any of this silly tripe ever amounts to anything.
Ummm...have you paid attention to the polls? Or to criticism being leveled by some in the liberal media? Heck, even a few of the libs in DC are starting to come around. The increasing lack of respect we are seeing on the int'l stage is being discussed in another thread. So, just because they aren't allowing you to see it, these scandals are amounting to something.
But that's the plan. Drip, drip drip... until people are sick of hearing the word scandal. Just like in Newt's day. The price will be paid by the crazy Right-wing again having forgotten the lessons of the Gingrich congress. I can't wait.
You may want to think in terms of drip, drip, drip (and I'm not talking about your fellow far left clowns who pollute this forum) but I see it as more of a snowball. The far left & it's media have resisted discussing BO's scandals but the sheer volume of scandals has become too much to ignore and it's being reflected in the polls.
Ha ha ha ha ha. The original polluter accusing everyone else of his own behavior. How funny. The "sheer volume" of proven vs accusation scandals is currently ZERO. You keep talking about polls. Polls are just opinions influenced by accusations that are still unproven. Give me any proven scandal with a conviction. ANY! Please just one.
What is your definition of "proven"? The IG found as fact that the IRS was targeting. They also admitted they were targeting. They sent $46M to a single address - that is public record. Holder has admitted that they sent guns to Mexico and they were used to kill Brian Terry. All of those companies who received "green" money really did go bankrupt and, so far as I can determine, every one of them was an Obama contributor. As for Benghazi, are you trying to tell me that Ambassador Stevens was not killed?
Proven, as is in convicted, as in guilty, as in against the law. Accusations are not proof. Everything you wing nuts post is directly tied to the Obama Administration yet nothing is ever brought to trial, no charges are ever filed, no one has gone to jail, but you fruits treat all your Fox inspired scandals as if they are conclusive proof of wrong doing by the administration. Why don't you just admit that you can't tie one scandal to the administration? You do it constantly in your thread titles but your conviction rate still sits at ZERO! Is the mere accusation enough for you guys? How UN-American you are.
Got one: Prominent Democrat, according to some people wing-nuts here. Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scooter_Libby
How to parse words. However, you are still wrong. Holder was charged - http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57463209/house-charges-holder-with-contempt-of-congress/ Even Obama has been charged (taking your cue parsing) - http://www.transworldnews.com/746812/c5/obama-charged-with-treason & http://beforeitsnews.com/opinion-co...treason-by-the-u-s-militaryagain-2521298.html
Here's another prominent Democrat, currently working for FOX "News": Gee, those Democrats and their scandals. Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oliver_North