It is a reference to Jeff Gannon the "reporter" who turned out to be a gay prostitute using press credentials to sneak into the white house for God knows what perverted activities. Read the link I am not makng this up.
yep still lost. if he had to sneak in he wasnt invited. and is the fact that he was gay or a prostitute that was the negative of that statment.(if it was a woman hooke would it have been ok? is what im asking)
He admits to being a gay prostitute who acts out military fantasies. The log shows he was in and out of the White House A LOT and he would sign out having never signed in (hence the sneak remark). I heard about the White House being turned into a gay brothel on our favorite radio network (Air America). W is a FREAKAZOID He was snuck in by a powerful person in the White House, considering the post-911 security it must have been a HIGH level person who got him past the sign in sheet (probably at a late hour).
well if you can quote your favorite fairy tales, I can quote mine omg.. it sounds just like a coin forum discussion
Sorry Danr, if you want to say that Bush is over his head, I would agree with you but for the left to make such ugly attacks that are completely baseless against a reborn again christian who is devoted to his family is truly the sickness here. By the way funny how nothing is said about Barney Frank sexually harrassing male interns. That was a real story. Ted Kennedy being a murder is a real story, etc. Now if you want to explorer the possibility that the homosexual that you are stating was getting paid to write probush articles you might have something there but I do not think that air america would want to go down that street for then people might wonder how much arab oil money is buying the american left's media effort to undermine our war on terror, etc..
Andy you ought to look into it, Gannon was signing out without ever having signed in> In post 911 white house you need the big guys permission for that one. BTW you know that Gannon openly admits that he is a gay prostitute who acts out military fantasies. This is better proof than Monica's dress.
but what is more immoral, paying for sex or being gay. imo anyone in the white house that has paid for sex should get the boot. and im sure there has been plenty.
Really this is in resopnse to the "sick Willie" comment. People love to beat up on the other guy but hate to hear the truth about their own guy. The real immoral part is the hypocricy. W comes on hot and heavy with the moralistic outwardly Christian persona but that is as phoney as a 3 dollar bill. Look what the dirtbag did to McCain, he sent his attack dogs out to besmirch his military record. Do I really believe Bush and Gannon were engaged in freaky sex? Could be. I mean that sign out sheet thing defies explaination.
Danh are you knowing making a false charge against the current President of the United States only because Clinton can't keep his pants on. Clinton's real sins as president was giving nuke technology to the North Koreans, helping out the Paki's with there nukes, attacking the Christian cities of the balkens on the Saudi's requests, giving China our space technology, etc. The whole Monic thing was the best thing that happened to Bill for it distracted attention away from his "real sins as a president" by focusing on the "sins of the man". By the way Danr I did look into your Gannon thing using your source and it appeared if anything was astrayed was that he might have been paid to have printed pro-bush articles in the gay newspapers that he was writing for. At best he was just invited to be part of the press core which being a gay writer for a gay newsource should not be attacked by the left but cheered.
"giving China our space technology," that is a great thing. thi means that there will be another country funding space exporation. if man has any long term future it will be in the stars. i know that sounds a little to scifi but it would have been like if man kind had never crossed the pond from europe/asia to north and south america.
I find it hard to believe China interested in stars other than as a "smoke and mirrors ploy". The actual cost to even deploy and operate a beginning space station is a huge burden she can't afford. There are far more strategic concerns than that.. i.e. the "cruise missles for taiwan program" Actually I'm still not quite so sure it was in the U.S. best interests in the 60's. Imagine seeing a pretty coin that you like and going head over heals into hock for it. I'm pretty certain thats why the Soviets bowed out of the space program, it wasn't a national hobby anymore, it was a full fledged war rockets vs. butter. The U.S. still has barely only paid the interest on the space program tab.
This technology has also given China the accuracy to hit California cities with nukes and the ability to pass it on to a lesser extent to its baby, North Korea.
That China thing is a red herring. I would think that you'd be more upset at Reagan for giving Iran missiles (Irancontra) or training Osama to blowup buildings. You ARE the big antiIslam guy. As for the Gannon/Bush relationship, it is there, it is real, and once the evil empire of Republicans crumbles I hope that they investigate it with as much vigor as they did Clinton.