Adobe Bought Flash?

Discussion in 'Chatter' started by mimus, Feb 13, 2008.

  1. "mixed nuts" <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote in message
    news:fp1utv$qlp$1@aioe.org...
    > Tim Weaver wrote:
    > > mixed nuts wrote:
    > >
    > >>mimus wrote:
    > >>
    > >>>On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:44:13 -0500, mixed nuts wrote:
    > >>>
    > >>>>mimus wrote:
    > >>>>
    > >>>>>When was that?
    > >>>>
    > >>>>http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/invrelations/adobeandmacromedia.html
    > >>>
    > >>>I'd look at that except I just tried to reinstall that POS Flash in a
    > >>>moment of aberration and now not only do active links not work but I

    > >
    > > can't
    > >
    > >>>even load Firefox directly.
    > >>>
    > >>>Adobe and Macromedia were made for each other.
    > >>>
    > >>That happens all the time. You picked the wrong version to make your
    > >>symbolic link to. HAHAHAHA!!!
    > >>
    > >>If this were windows you would have to reformat your disk and reinstall
    > >>windows and wait 3 days while all the security patches got installed
    > >>and then reboot 3 or 2 times whilst macromedia added itself to your
    > >>package of surveillors.
    > >>
    > >>With Linux, you have two options: Read the instructions and choose
    > >>the correct plug-in for the version of firefox you have, OR try
    > >>different plug-ins (systematically or randomly as you prefer) until
    > >>firefox restarts properly. No need to start from scratch. You don't
    > >>even have to log out or become the superuser!
    > >>
    > >>LOL.

    > >
    > > I was thinking of trying a Linux system. But, two questions:
    > >
    > > 1) Which package is the best for a first time installer?
    > > 2) I assume I can boot it with Vista, yes?

    >
    > 1) a. I use Fedora partly because the IT geeks here support a lot of
    > Redhat enterprise machines and Fedora is the same thing. The installer
    > generally figures out the hardware perfectly with only a couple of
    > exceptions - one time an on-board 100BaseT interface wouldn't
    > initialize so I disabled it and plugged in a board, another time a
    > fancy high-end graphics card was too gamey and wasn't supported well
    > (funny rendering) so I sent it back and plugged in a Fire-GL.
    >
    > b. Open Suse seems to be similarly painless but I have only a little
    > direct experience.
    >
    > c. Ubuntu is well loved by many - it smells a lot like windows which
    > makes a lot of people happy. A few months ago I had to kick 2 machines
    > off the network and cram a Fedora distrib. down the offender's throats
    > because normal login was with root privilege - we have a shared server
    > which (because we trust 'intelligent' people not to piss in their own
    > boots) allows anyone logged into root to make maintenance-level
    > changes. All you need is klutz with root permission to make a dumn
    > mistake...
    >
    > d. I know happy slackware people. And Mandrake people. And BSD
    > people. And happy other distrib. people - it's just that the center of
    > mass for easy to install-debugged-tested stuff seems to favor a, b and
    > c.
    >
    > 2) GRUB (GRand Unified Boot thinger or the equivalent) will handle
    > however many O/S you care to install. You can edit the config file
    > after install to set defaults and preferences as you wish.
    > It is wise, if you are not an experienced user of partition editing
    > software and don't want to bruise your windows installation, to invest
    > in something like 'Partition Magic' to make space on the disk for the
    > Linux. Or you could add a separate drive and not have to touch windows
    > space at all.


    Gee, I'm glad you cleared all that up for me.

    *bangs head with rock*

    Smee

    >
    > --
    > nuts
     
  2. mixed nuts

    mixed nuts Guest

    pscissons@sbcglobal.net wrote:
    > "mixed nuts" <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote in message
    > news:fp1utv$qlp$1@aioe.org...
    >
    >>Tim Weaver wrote:
    >>
    >>>mixed nuts wrote:
    >>>
    >>>>mimus wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>>On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:44:13 -0500, mixed nuts wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>>mimus wrote:
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>>When was that?
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/invrelations/adobeandmacromedia.html
    >>>>>
    >>>>>I'd look at that except I just tried to reinstall that POS Flash in a
    >>>>>moment of aberration and now not only do active links not work but I
    >>>
    >>>can't
    >>>
    >>>>>even load Firefox directly.
    >>>>>
    >>>>>Adobe and Macromedia were made for each other.
    >>>>>
    >>>>That happens all the time. You picked the wrong version to make your
    >>>>symbolic link to. HAHAHAHA!!!
    >>>>
    >>>>If this were windows you would have to reformat your disk and reinstall
    >>>>windows and wait 3 days while all the security patches got installed
    >>>>and then reboot 3 or 2 times whilst macromedia added itself to your
    >>>>package of surveillors.
    >>>>
    >>>>With Linux, you have two options: Read the instructions and choose
    >>>>the correct plug-in for the version of firefox you have, OR try
    >>>>different plug-ins (systematically or randomly as you prefer) until
    >>>>firefox restarts properly. No need to start from scratch. You don't
    >>>>even have to log out or become the superuser!
    >>>>
    >>>>LOL.
    >>>
    >>>I was thinking of trying a Linux system. But, two questions:
    >>>
    >>>1) Which package is the best for a first time installer?
    >>>2) I assume I can boot it with Vista, yes?

    >>
    >>1) a. I use Fedora partly because the IT geeks here support a lot of
    >>Redhat enterprise machines and Fedora is the same thing. The installer
    >>generally figures out the hardware perfectly with only a couple of
    >>exceptions - one time an on-board 100BaseT interface wouldn't
    >>initialize so I disabled it and plugged in a board, another time a
    >>fancy high-end graphics card was too gamey and wasn't supported well
    >>(funny rendering) so I sent it back and plugged in a Fire-GL.
    >>
    >> b. Open Suse seems to be similarly painless but I have only a little
    >>direct experience.
    >>
    >> c. Ubuntu is well loved by many - it smells a lot like windows which
    >>makes a lot of people happy. A few months ago I had to kick 2 machines
    >>off the network and cram a Fedora distrib. down the offender's throats
    >>because normal login was with root privilege - we have a shared server
    >>which (because we trust 'intelligent' people not to piss in their own
    >>boots) allows anyone logged into root to make maintenance-level
    >>changes. All you need is klutz with root permission to make a dumn
    >>mistake...
    >>
    >> d. I know happy slackware people. And Mandrake people. And BSD
    >>people. And happy other distrib. people - it's just that the center of
    >>mass for easy to install-debugged-tested stuff seems to favor a, b and
    >>c.
    >>
    >>2) GRUB (GRand Unified Boot thinger or the equivalent) will handle
    >>however many O/S you care to install. You can edit the config file
    >>after install to set defaults and preferences as you wish.
    >>It is wise, if you are not an experienced user of partition editing
    >>software and don't want to bruise your windows installation, to invest
    >>in something like 'Partition Magic' to make space on the disk for the
    >>Linux. Or you could add a separate drive and not have to touch windows
    >>space at all.

    >
    > Gee, I'm glad you cleared all that up for me.
    >
    > *bangs head with rock*
    >

    Would you like a bite of this garlic bagel (toasted, with cream cheese)
    and a sip of this here fresh-made coffee (I chopped the beans with my
    V8 coffee bean chopper just minutes ago).

    --
    nuts
     

Share This Page