A Hard Fact

Discussion in 'Chatter' started by mimus, Mar 19, 2008.

  1. mimus

    mimus Guest

    Each and every diamond is a single extraordinarily-large organic molecule.

    --
    tinmimus99@hotmail.com

    smeeter 11 or maybe 12

    mp 10

    mhm 29x13

    I wonder what I have been up to.

    < _Beyond Apollo_
     
  2. Wavy G

    Wavy G Guest

    Dear, "mimus": Do you like me? Please check a box ( ) YES ( ) NO:

    >Each and every diamond is a single extraordinarily-large organic molecule.


    LOL, "Hard," LOL.
    --
    "If you don't get slapped, you're not doing it right."
    --Tim Weaver gives me the best dating advice I've ever had.
    (PS: Apologies to Mimus.)

    *****************************************
    * *
    * Wavy G *
    * mail me at: *
    * godsspeciallamb@gmail.com *
    * *
    * *
    *****************************************
     
  3. mixed nuts

    mixed nuts Guest

    mimus wrote:
    > Each and every diamond is a single extraordinarily-large organic molecule.
    >

    Coal too.

    Superman can make diamonds out of coal.

    --
    nuts
     
  4. mimus

    mimus Guest

    On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:54:10 -0500, mixed nuts wrote:

    > mimus wrote:
    >
    >> Each and every diamond is a single extraordinarily-large organic
    >> molecule.

    >
    > Coal too.


    Um. No. I don't believe coal is integrally covalently-bonded. Or for
    that matter even homogenous.

    > Superman can make diamonds out of coal.


    The diamond cartel has some kryptonite with his name on it, I betcha.

    --
    tinmimus99@hotmail.com

    smeeter 11 or maybe 12

    mp 10

    mhm 29x13

    Quando omni flunkus moritati.

    (When all else fails, play dead.)

    < Possum Lodge motto
     
  5. On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:17:11 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    >Each and every diamond is a single extraordinarily-large organic molecule.


    id say something here, but im not nearly awake enough to be witty.

    --
    dave hillstrom mhm15x4 zrbj

    <This space for rent.>
     
  6. On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:17:24 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    >On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:54:10 -0500, mixed nuts wrote:
    >
    >> mimus wrote:
    >>
    >>> Each and every diamond is a single extraordinarily-large organic
    >>> molecule.

    >>
    >> Coal too.

    >
    >Um. No. I don't believe coal is integrally covalently-bonded. Or for
    >that matter even homogenous.
    >
    >> Superman can make diamonds out of coal.

    >
    >The diamond cartel has some kryptonite with his name on it, I betcha.


    i fart diamonds. truth.

    --
    dave hillstrom mhm15x4 zrbj

    <This space for rent.>
     
  7. On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:54:10 -0500, mixed nuts
    <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote:

    >mimus wrote:
    >> Each and every diamond is a single extraordinarily-large organic molecule.
    >>

    >Coal too.
    >
    >Superman can make diamonds out of coal.


    superman can fart diamonds.

    --
    dave hillstrom mhm15x4 zrbj

    <This space for rent.>
     
  8. mixed nuts

    mixed nuts Guest

    mimus wrote:
    > On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:54:10 -0500, mixed nuts wrote:
    >
    >>mimus wrote:
    >>
    >>>Each and every diamond is a single extraordinarily-large organic
    >>>molecule.

    >>
    >>Coal too.

    >
    > Um. No. I don't believe coal is integrally covalently-bonded. Or for
    > that matter even homogenous.


    So, what is it that holds the coal together? _Coalvalent_ bonds?

    --
    nuts
     
  9. mimus

    mimus Guest

    On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 03:36:15 -0400, dave hillstrom wrote:

    > On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:17:24 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>
    > wrote:
    >
    >> On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:54:10 -0500, mixed nuts wrote:
    >>
    >>> mimus wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> Each and every diamond is a single extraordinarily-large organic
    >>>> molecule.
    >>>
    >>> Coal too.

    >>
    >> Um. No. I don't believe coal is integrally covalently-bonded. Or for
    >> that matter even homogenous.
    >>
    >>> Superman can make diamonds out of coal.

    >>
    >> The diamond cartel has some kryptonite with his name on it, I betcha.

    >
    > i fart diamonds. truth.


    Yer fulla schist.

    --
    tinmimus99@hotmail.com

    smeeter 11 or maybe 12

    mp 10

    mhm 29x13

    You want a job and a lizard to ride?

    < _The Einstein Intersection_
     
  10. mimus

    mimus Guest

    On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:05:54 -0400, mixed nuts wrote:

    > mimus wrote:
    >
    >> On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:54:10 -0500, mixed nuts wrote:
    >>
    >>> mimus wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> Each and every diamond is a single extraordinarily-large organic
    >>>> molecule.
    >>>
    >>> Coal too.

    >>
    >> Um. No. I don't believe coal is integrally covalently-bonded. Or for
    >> that matter even homogenous.

    >
    > So, what is it that holds the coal together? _Coalvalent_ bonds?


    Don't you dare get ionic with me.

    --
    tinmimus99@hotmail.com

    smeeter 11 or maybe 12

    mp 10

    mhm 29x13

    You want a job and a lizard to ride?

    < _The Einstein Intersection_
     
  11. On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:05:54 -0400, mixed nuts
    <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote:

    >mimus wrote:
    >> On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:54:10 -0500, mixed nuts wrote:
    >>
    >>>mimus wrote:
    >>>
    >>>>Each and every diamond is a single extraordinarily-large organic
    >>>>molecule.
    >>>
    >>>Coal too.

    >>
    >> Um. No. I don't believe coal is integrally covalently-bonded. Or for
    >> that matter even homogenous.

    >
    >So, what is it that holds the coal together? _Coalvalent_ bonds?


    SMEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!

    --
    dave hillstrom mhm15x4 zrbj

    <This space for rent.>
     
  12. "dave hillstrom" <DaVe@MeOw.OrG> wrote in message
    news:vmu5u3tgjtmodt5vq6gbk1lidhqs9bnre7@4ax.com...
    > On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:05:54 -0400, mixed nuts
    > <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote:
    >
    > >mimus wrote:
    > >> On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:54:10 -0500, mixed nuts wrote:
    > >>
    > >>>mimus wrote:
    > >>>
    > >>>>Each and every diamond is a single extraordinarily-large organic
    > >>>>molecule.
    > >>>
    > >>>Coal too.
    > >>
    > >> Um. No. I don't believe coal is integrally covalently-bonded. Or for
    > >> that matter even homogenous.

    > >
    > >So, what is it that holds the coal together? _Coalvalent_ bonds?

    >
    > SMEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!


    Take a deep breath. They're not using actual numbers or equations yet.

    Smee

    >
    > --
    > dave hillstrom mhm15x4 zrbj
    >
    > <This space for rent.>
     
  13. On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 07:00:37 GMT, <pscissons@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

    >
    >"dave hillstrom" <DaVe@MeOw.OrG> wrote in message
    >news:vmu5u3tgjtmodt5vq6gbk1lidhqs9bnre7@4ax.com...
    >> On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:05:54 -0400, mixed nuts
    >> <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote:
    >>
    >> >mimus wrote:
    >> >> On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:54:10 -0500, mixed nuts wrote:
    >> >>
    >> >>>mimus wrote:
    >> >>>
    >> >>>>Each and every diamond is a single extraordinarily-large organic
    >> >>>>molecule.
    >> >>>
    >> >>>Coal too.
    >> >>
    >> >> Um. No. I don't believe coal is integrally covalently-bonded. Or for
    >> >> that matter even homogenous.
    >> >
    >> >So, what is it that holds the coal together? _Coalvalent_ bonds?

    >>
    >> SMEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!

    >
    >Take a deep breath. They're not using actual numbers or equations yet.


    and horrible puns!

    --
    dave hillstrom mhm15x4 zrbj

    <This space for rent.>
     
  14. On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:34:42 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    >On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:05:54 -0400, mixed nuts wrote:
    >
    >> mimus wrote:
    >>
    >>> On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:54:10 -0500, mixed nuts wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> mimus wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> Each and every diamond is a single extraordinarily-large organic
    >>>>> molecule.
    >>>>
    >>>> Coal too.
    >>>
    >>> Um. No. I don't believe coal is integrally covalently-bonded. Or for
    >>> that matter even homogenous.

    >>
    >> So, what is it that holds the coal together? _Coalvalent_ bonds?

    >
    >Don't you dare get ionic with me.


    face centered dorks.

    --
    dave hillstrom mhm15x4 zrbj

    <This space for rent.>
     
  15. mimus

    mimus Guest

    On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 07:00:37 +0000, pscissons wrote:

    > "dave hillstrom" <DaVe@MeOw.OrG> wrote in message
    > news:vmu5u3tgjtmodt5vq6gbk1lidhqs9bnre7@4ax.com...
    >
    >> On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:05:54 -0400, mixed nuts
    >> <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote:
    >>
    >> > mimus wrote:
    >> >
    >> >> On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:54:10 -0500, mixed nuts wrote:
    >> >>
    >> >>> mimus wrote:
    >> >>>
    >> >>>> Each and every diamond is a single extraordinarily-large organic
    >> >>>> molecule.
    >> >>>
    >> >>> Coal too.
    >> >>
    >> >> Um. No. I don't believe coal is integrally covalently-bonded. Or for
    >> >> that matter even homogenous.
    >> >
    >> > So, what is it that holds the coal together? _Coalvalent_ bonds?

    >>
    >> SMEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!

    >
    > Take a deep breath. They're not using actual numbers or equations yet.
    >
    > Smee


    No-one's ever been able to work out the equations for even a simple
    ordinary hydrogen molecule yet . . . .

    And even if they did, the set of equations involved would be meaningless
    due to the number of equations and their complexities.

    It's been suggested they be encoded as music . . . .

    --
    tinmimus99@hotmail.com

    smeeter 11 or maybe 12

    mp 10

    mhm 29x13

    "The math is easy," said Chaos.

    < _Thief of Time_
     
  16. mimus

    mimus Guest

    On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 04:06:23 -0400, dave hillstrom wrote:

    > On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 07:00:37 GMT, <pscissons@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    >
    >> "dave hillstrom" <DaVe@MeOw.OrG> wrote in message
    >> news:vmu5u3tgjtmodt5vq6gbk1lidhqs9bnre7@4ax.com...
    >>
    >>> On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:05:54 -0400, mixed nuts
    >>> <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote:
    >>>
    >>> > mimus wrote:
    >>> >
    >>> >> On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:54:10 -0500, mixed nuts wrote:
    >>> >>
    >>> >>> mimus wrote:
    >>> >>>
    >>> >>>> Each and every diamond is a single extraordinarily-large organic
    >>> >>>> molecule.
    >>> >>>
    >>> >>> Coal too.
    >>> >>
    >>> >> Um. No. I don't believe coal is integrally covalently-bonded. Or
    >>> >> for that matter even homogenous.
    >>> >
    >>> > So, what is it that holds the coal together? _Coalvalent_ bonds?
    >>>
    >>> SMEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!

    >>
    >> Take a deep breath. They're not using actual numbers or equations yet.

    >
    > and horrible puns!


    <calmly>

    Puns don't count.

    And "horrible" is redundant or tautological in this context.

    --
    tinmimus99@hotmail.com

    smeeter 11 or maybe 12

    mp 10

    mhm 29x13

    This is part of the eternal wonder of the universe
    as man forages out to discover in the womb of time
    the nascence of his individuality in the motherhood of possibility.

    < Malzberg
     
  17. mimus

    mimus Guest

    On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 04:33:04 -0400, dave hillstrom wrote:

    > On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:34:42 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>
    > wrote:
    >
    >> On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:05:54 -0400, mixed nuts wrote:
    >>
    >>> mimus wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:54:10 -0500, mixed nuts wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> mimus wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>> Each and every diamond is a single extraordinarily-large organic
    >>>>>> molecule.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Coal too.
    >>>>
    >>>> Um. No. I don't believe coal is integrally covalently-bonded. Or for
    >>>> that matter even homogenous.
    >>>
    >>> So, what is it that holds the coal together? _Coalvalent_ bonds?

    >>
    >> Don't you dare get ionic with me.

    >
    > face centered dorks.


    Are all crystals self-centered?

    --
    tinmimus99@hotmail.com

    smeeter 11 or maybe 12

    mp 10

    mhm 29x13

    I wonder what I have been up to.

    < _Beyond Apollo_
     
  18. mixed nuts

    mixed nuts Guest

    mimus wrote:
    > On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 07:00:37 +0000, pscissons wrote:
    >
    >>"dave hillstrom" <DaVe@MeOw.OrG> wrote in message
    >>news:vmu5u3tgjtmodt5vq6gbk1lidhqs9bnre7@4ax.com...
    >>
    >>>On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:05:54 -0400, mixed nuts
    >>><melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote:
    >>>
    >>>>mimus wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>>On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:54:10 -0500, mixed nuts wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>>mimus wrote:
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>>Each and every diamond is a single extraordinarily-large organic
    >>>>>>>molecule.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>Coal too.
    >>>>>
    >>>>>Um. No. I don't believe coal is integrally covalently-bonded. Or for
    >>>>>that matter even homogenous.
    >>>>
    >>>>So, what is it that holds the coal together? _Coalvalent_ bonds?
    >>>
    >>>SMEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!

    >>
    >>Take a deep breath. They're not using actual numbers or equations yet.
    >>
    >>Smee

    >
    > No-one's ever been able to work out the equations for even a simple
    > ordinary hydrogen molecule yet . . . .
    >
    > And even if they did, the set of equations involved would be meaningless
    > due to the number of equations and their complexities.


    People like to say these things. Fortunately, things have advanced
    since the 1930's and we no longer limit ourselves to directly solving
    the schroedinger equation the hard way (we use computers and efficient
    algorithms and such) which is the situation to which you refer.

    >
    > It's been suggested they be encoded as music . . . .
    >

    Insofar as the various selections rules and harmonic relationships exist
    in quantum mechanics - by rescaling frequencies one could get some
    rather pleasing sounds out of a lump of nondescript chemicals.

    --
    nuts
     
  19. mimus

    mimus Guest

    On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 17:29:36 -0400, mixed nuts wrote:

    > mimus wrote:
    >
    >> On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 07:00:37 +0000, pscissons wrote:
    >>
    >>> "dave hillstrom" <DaVe@MeOw.OrG> wrote in message
    >>> news:vmu5u3tgjtmodt5vq6gbk1lidhqs9bnre7@4ax.com...
    >>>
    >>>> On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:05:54 -0400, mixed nuts
    >>>> <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> mimus wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>> On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:54:10 -0500, mixed nuts wrote:
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>> mimus wrote:
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> Each and every diamond is a single extraordinarily-large organic
    >>>>>>>> molecule.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> Coal too.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> Um. No. I don't believe coal is integrally covalently-bonded. Or
    >>>>>> for that matter even homogenous.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> So, what is it that holds the coal together? _Coalvalent_ bonds?
    >>>>
    >>>> SMEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!
    >>>
    >>> Take a deep breath. They're not using actual numbers or equations yet.
    >>>
    >>> Smee

    >>
    >> No-one's ever been able to work out the equations for even a simple
    >> ordinary hydrogen molecule yet . . . .
    >>
    >> And even if they did, the set of equations involved would be
    >> meaningless due to the number of equations and their complexities.

    >
    > People like to say these things. Fortunately, things have advanced
    > since the 1930's and we no longer limit ourselves to directly solving
    > the schroedinger equation the hard way (we use computers and efficient
    > algorithms and such) which is the situation to which you refer.


    Ahem.

    We still do not have even the set for the SIMPLE ORDINARY HYDROGEN
    MOLECULE.

    And even if we did, the equations as a set would STILL BE MEANINGLESS TO
    SIMPLE ORDINARY HUMAN COMPREHENSION.

    Now, what one would try to do, of course, is apply various simplifications
    and symbolizations in such ways as to reflect various aspects of the
    molecule in more or less comprehensible forms.

    But the full set, fugeddaboudit.

    BTW, last I read, far as anyone has gotten, someone had worked out a
    a set of equations, based on the usual simplifications ignoring inter-
    electronic, nuclear- electronic and nuclear- nuclear interactions, for
    the rather bizarre situation in which you have two protons and a single
    electron, a sort of diatomic molecular cation . . . .

    >> It's been suggested they be encoded as music . . . .

    >
    > Insofar as the various selections rules and harmonic relationships exist
    > in quantum mechanics - by rescaling frequencies one could get some
    > rather pleasing sounds out of a lump of nondescript chemicals.


    More likely it would sound like Merzbow doing "Music for Mass Vivisection"
    or something.

    --
    tinmimus99@hotmail.com

    smeeter 11 or maybe 12

    mp 10

    mhm 29x13

    Since when is a mechanical cow an act of God?

    < Goulart
     
  20. Shirley

    Shirley Guest

Share This Page