911 Truth, Buildings Collapsing.

http://usinfo.state.gov/media/Archive/2005/Sep/16-241966.html
sorry Danr, looks like your video has no credibility

 

bqcoins...I see that you are trying to have an intelligent discussion with our village idiot.

Remember...intelligence and this idiot go together like oil and water so take my advice and put him on your ignore list. As I read your response to him, I see that he is still pushing his "LSD-hippie-loser" theories that 9/11 was caused by Bush instead of islamic animals. I also see that he is talking about building #7.

Let's say that he is right and #7 was blown up/knocked down by the government like this idiot believes, the question would be "why'"?? What does building #7 symbolize over tower #1 and tower #2...or beyond these two towers?

If you were planning a government conspiracy attack of the WTC property, would you care if WTC #7 fell or stood? How many people outside of NYC knew of this property and its purpose? When you look (or looked) at the NYC skyline, what structures come to your mind? I can poll 10,000 people and I would bet that not ONE would mention building #7! Still, the idiiot believes it was all part of one big government cover up instead of blaming the true cause of that terrible day...islamic animals!

The WTC towers represent and symbolized a number of things (capitalism, business, power, freedom, etc.) and made it a perfect target for attack by islamics animals. Remember, islamic animals attacked this site in 1993 and tried to topple one the towers into the other! The idiot probably forgot to mention that! 6 people were killed in this first attack by islamic animals (per their jihad/quran) and they technically failed. However...their jihad was not deterred and they patiently waited for the next opening.

So bqcoins, it doesn't matter that several outside private institutions, including the Structural Engineering Institute of the American Society of Civil Engineers (SEI/ASCE), the Society of Fire Protection Engineers (SFPE), the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), the American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC), the Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat (CTBUH), and the Structural Engineers Association of New York (SEAoNY) all agree that WTC #7 collapsed due to "loss of structural integrity which was likely a result of weakening caused by fires on the 5th to 7th floors".

Of course the fires came from falling debris from towers #1 and #2 after two fuel-loaded jet airliners smashed into each tower...

I could go on and on...but remember...when you deal with an idiot, all you will get is his "conspiracy theories"...facts!?!...you mean you want facts and evidence from this idiot?? What is he going to offer as proof? A internet video made by some drug-laced college student?? Typical...so typical.

 

I wanna know what hit the Pentagon...

 

American Airlines Flight #77 which was hijacked by islamic animals on September 11th, 2001.

 

This from another investigative website.

http://www.oilempire.us/demolition.html#pullit
It is hard to say whether the Silverstein "pull it" quote is (1) bait, (2) boasting or (3) greatly misinterpreted. Any attorney or public relations representative would state that the context is "the firefighter team had such a terrible loss of life, so therefore they made the decision to pull it (the firefighters)."
The State Department discussion of “pull it” shows that this prediction has been verified.
In September 2005, Silverstein's office issued a "clarification" that shows the futility of relying on this sort of "evidence" to make political change.
http://usinfo.state.gov/media/Archive/2005/Sep/16-241966.html
The Collapse of World Trade Center 7
Allegation: 9/11 Revealed suggests that the 47-story World Trade Center 7 building, which collapsed at 5:20 pm on September 11, was intentionally demolished. The primary piece of evidence for this is a comment that Mr. Larry Silverstein, who owned the World Trade Center complex, made on the September 2002 television documentary American Rebuilds. Mr. Silverstein said:
I remember getting a call from the Fire Department commander, telling me they were not sure they were going to be able to contain the fire. I said, you know, “We've had such terrible loss of life that the smartest thing to do is just pull it.” And they made that decision to pull it and we watched the [World Trade Center 7] building collapse.
9/11 Revealed and other conspiracy theorists put forward the notion that Mr. Silverstein’s suggestion to “pull it” is slang for intentionally demolishing the WTC 7 building.
Facts: On September 9, 2005, Mr. Dara McQuillan, a spokesman for Silverstein Properties, issued the following statement on this issue:
Seven World Trade Center collapsed at 5:20 p.m. on September 11, 2001, after burning for seven hours. There were no casualties, thanks to the heroism of the Fire Department and the work of Silverstein Properties employees who evacuated tenants from the building.
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) conducted a thorough investigation of the collapse of all the World Trade Center buildings. The FEMA report concluded that the collapse of Seven World Trade Center was a direct result of fires triggered by debris from the collapse of WTC Tower 1.
In the afternoon of September 11, Mr. Silverstein spoke to the Fire Department Commander on site at Seven World Trade Center. The Commander told Mr. Silverstein that there were several firefighters in the building working to contain the fires. Mr. Silverstein expressed his view that the most important thing was to protect the safety of those firefighters, including, if necessary, to have them withdraw from the building.
Later in the day, the Fire Commander ordered his firefighters out of the building and at 5:20 p.m. the building collapsed. No lives were lost at Seven World Trade Center on September 11, 2001.
As noted above, when Mr. Silverstein was recounting these events for a television documentary he stated, “I said, you know, we've had such terrible loss of life. Maybe the smartest thing to do is to pull it.” Mr. McQuillan has stated that by “it,” Mr. Silverstein meant the contingent of firefighters remaining in the building.

Anything else you need debunked...I don't do JFK though its just too convoluted sorry

 

Everybody deserves saving, besides if I put him on the ignore list I get fewer laughs during the day. Plus he might actually have something to say about coins that I WOULD appreciate

 

Funny that the dot gov webpage has Silverstien retracting the comment, my what a surprise.

 

We are all aware that this sick piece of crap advocates genocide.

 

?????????? this is a pretty abstract statement. Silverstien clearly said that they pulled the building. All of this fancy footwork is a pretty predictable response.

 

Give me an f'in break. So.........because it's a gov site, it's invalid?

 

the whole fact of the matter is that no matter how you put it "pull it" doesn't mean blow up.

 

In the vernacular of that trade pull it means controlled demolition. Silverstien is immersed in every aspect of that industry so naturally he used that term.

 

I think your fact receptors have been blocked by poo

 

Could not have said it better myself! very well put!

 

My sisters boyfriend is a demolitions expert, as are the people who works with. NONE of them have ever used that term.

 

"A fifth column is a group of people which clandestinely undermines a larger group to which it is expected to be loyal, such as a nation. The term originated with a 1936 radio address by Emilio Mola, a Nationalist general during the 1936-39 Spanish Civil War. As four of his army columns moved on Madrid, the general referred to his militant supporters within the capital as his "fifth column," intent on undermining the Republican government from within."

"The term is also used in reference to a population who are assumed to have loyalties to countries other than the one in which they reside, or who support some other nation in war efforts against the country they live in".

We have people who wish to undermine our present government not out of a desire of a change in democracy but out of a desire to end democracy. Some of them know it, others are just unknowing puppets of allah speaking as their strings are pulled thinking it is independent thought not realizing that they are being manipulated with bogus websites and nondata.

I ignore puppets of allah even if I wish to turn them into sawdust.

 

You, sir, advocate genocide, therefore you lack the moral authority to make any statement of this sort.

 

This vid has a section with demo experts running around using the term as I described. Your friends demo buildings??? Pretty unusual to know someone in that area (not that many buildings pulled in a year).

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-481003634918233931&q=jones 911

 

Well, my sister is a mechanical engineer and works for the Army in Aberdeen. Her boyfriend is a demolition engineer. He has blown up many of buildings, as he works for a firm that specializes in that field (my sister met her boyfriend when he worked for the army)

 

Zane for now you appear to have made yourself somewhat familiar with the evidence and rejected it. That is all I can ask. I do respect the fact that you have taken a look at the evidence (that is more than most have done). Keep your eye on the issue though it is not going away and more evidence will surface, be open to new evidence as it emerges.