Lehigh, Paridigm shift. Put everything you know into a box and shut it. Start over. You'll be suprised if you are willing to take the blinders off. I'm telling you, I thought Tomc was a raving lunatic at first, but he is on to something. Thousands and thousands of pieces of circumstantial evidence does pile up. you will have an " ah-ha " moment.
Everything I have looked at is so full of crap it isn't even funny. You would have to believe everything I was taught in school was BS, the entire government is composed of conspirators and only 1% of the US is smart enough/educated enough to figure it out. Really?!?!?!
Jack, You guys are seeing what you want to see and in the process are discarding logic and all of the evidence that does not jive with this crazy theory. Tom will never answer, nor will any other hard core truther, but maybe you will. What motive could anyone in the government have to do this?
The PNAC document goes a long way to explaining the motives. You're believing what you want to believe versus what may have occurred alternatively. All of the "official" evidence requires some leap of faith, or some element of trust. Discard that mentality and replace it with strict objectivity, and things come into focus much easier. If you're going into it with "This simply can't be possible", then that most likely exactly what you'll conclude. Objectively, the "official" story is full of holes, full of "trust us", in place of proof.
Try again, this document impies that the government used the events of 9/11 to serve their own political goals and the implication is predicated upon not having involvement in 9/11. Here is the relevant quote. You need to provide a motive for the government to conduct 9/11, not merely exploit it.
A motive? Seriously? PNAC's stated goals outline pretty clearly what they wanted to establish. World dominance, quite simply. Cheney, Rummy, and the rest of the gang were/are very strongly tied to the PNAC project, all through the 90's. Cheney most notably. Let's try this information: News of Interest.TV - Paul Wolfowitz - PNAC and the “New Pearl Harbor” Sooooooooooooo.....?????????? Please tell me you get the concept?!
When you built puzzles as a kid, if the pieces didn't fit, did you try to make them fit? That is what you are doing now. Your so called motive is crazier than the actual 9/11 truther conspiracy!
I asked you this some time back. Operation Northwoods. Did this happen? Would you have called that a conspiracy? CRAZY. I know but, humor me please.
Last time I checked, we have never gone to war with Cuba. Therefore, NO, it never happened. Did someone come up with that crazy plan? I am sure they did, and someone else with some sense said "no way"? You bet! What the hell does this have to do with 9/11? Are you claiming that the Bush administration was such a fan of Operation Northwoods that they actually decided to implement it?
I'm trying to make the point that false flag operations, black ops, things that are "secret" occur with regularity. It was as a response to your response of (paraphrasing), big conspiracy would need lots of people, etc,etc. I chose Operation Northwoods because it is one of the more well know ones. There are plenty of others. Anyway, I asked and you answered. Thanks.
Common questions about nanothermite/thermate answered Steven Jones extinguishes some common misconceptions about how the WTC's were demolished. Responses to questions re thermite, nanothermite, conventional explosives used in the WTC destruction - 911truth.org
48% of NewYorkers want new investigation I'm actually surprised it's only 48%. Poll: 48% of New Yorkers Support Investigation of WTC 7 | 911 Truth News
So 33% were unaware that WTC7 collapsed but 48% want a new investigation because of WTC7. You accuse the government of 9/11 and I accuse the truther clowns of conducting what is obviously a biased poll.
"36 percent of all respondents are inclined to believe critics" i.e. it is not a random poll. Totally invalid (to everyone but Tom).
Totally invalid? Ok, whatever. Your opinion and all that, but despite your apparent allegiance to the "official" explanation given about WTC7, many have a lot of questions about its demise. I think the poll certainly reflects that much.
