Unsurprisingly there's already been several incidents of people impersonating feds to terrorize the streets. That's why you can't have an unidentifiable policing force like this.
It has been brewing for a very long time. Yesterday's NYC mayoral primary placed the proverbial nail in its coffin. Zohran Mamdani wins the general election and NYC is phucked. Big time. Even worse than it already is. Hasta la vista NYC. Very sad.
And what would you have them do? Show their picture ID so some sick lib can post them and their families addresses on social media to be attacked by MS13?….. You guys are really pathetic until trouble comes to your door.
Yeah…… That’s what they get for being low-info voters. I suppose we should get ready for waves of New Yonkers to head our way now that we have all the migrated Californians settled.
When the article stated, "masked armed gunmen causing chaos in the streets", I thought they were referring to Antifa.
I agree with you, but there's a part of me that thinks it might be better to have a Socialist (gasp!) in charge rather than lying scumbag Cuomo. Nah, I'd rather have lying scumbag Cuomo than a Socialist. Better to have the devil we know.
Yeah, as law enforcement they're literally breaking the law when they don't identify themselves while performing law enforcement work actively. That's the pact for being agents of the law with special powers and priveliges.
No, Trump didn't give China the discount. Based on the markets it looks like maybe Trump gave the entire globe a discount.
What do you call removing the sanctions? Though I'm reading now he basically was just shooting from the hip without understanding his words (big surprise) and confused/caused chaos at the offices in Washington that layout enforcement for sanctions.
Mr. Mamdani is, economically, a VERY DANGEROUS man...as is his father, and a VERY PREJUDICED man, as is his Father. Father AND Son have a shared goal.....independent wealth....FOR THEM, at the expense of the rest of their community, and obtaining personal wealth by means of using the coffers of government to do so. THAT IS THE HIDDEN BASIS OF BOTH OF THEIR SUPPOSED POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY.
NO! The "gentleman" is not a Socialist. This is a feint foisted on The People by this dangerous person, using the time tested method of all despots.....ignorance of the uninformed.
I'm suggesting due to sanctions, they paid significantly more to buy it through back channels. They also were thus incentivized to do business elsewhere
What law is that? Can you quote it? Generally speaking, law enforcement is NOT required to identify themselves. Sure, some departments have policies requiring officers to identify, but those are POLICIES. Liberal California has a law, but it’s effectively neutered because it doesn’t require law enforcement to display identification on their uniforms. I’d like to know what law they would be breaking (as you stated above).
You're correct, it's state laws, but California is quite relevant here. There's many accounts of them refusing there and in New York where there's similar laws. Can you blame soneone for resisting if masked men without identification are trying to throw you into an unmarked vehicle? Can you blame community members for trying to stop it or calling the local police on them?
Sure... If they were community members. We are not discussing community members. We are discussing criminals.