President of MSNBC Calls For Investigation of FOX Ratings

View attachment 2033 View attachment 2034

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2013/10/16/megyn-kellys-ratings-rise-legit-nielsen/

 

So FOX reported this? OK Did they consult President Romney first?

 

Yes, of course FOX reported the news. You don't think MSNBC is going to report the news, do you? Nielsen confirmed the data... are you going to attack them, too?

View attachment 2035

 

Here. Would you feel better if the Huffington Post reported the same thing?

View attachment 2036

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/...-phil-griffin_n_4100279.html?utm_hp_ref=media

 

Oops!

 

Well MR. OOPS! I don't care what some guy I've never heard of at MSNBC says about his competition. I really don't care what the real numbers are either based on polling of mostly ignorant people like yourself. And I REALLY, REALLY don't care about FOX in any capacity. So Oops!

 

Cognitive Dissonance ...yup, that's Joe alright!

The Fox and the Grapes...

 

Thanks for the psychoanalysis! I'm sure you're eminently qualified.

 

Nailed it!!!

 

Cmon folks.We give Mr Nation too much credit. He sits in moms basement making poop castles and reading his daily opinion fromEd Shults. Really?

 

LMAO!!

 

Joe, I'm not saying I "know" how your mind works (I certainly hope not, anyway). However, you may want to mention my diagnosis to your therapist the next time you see her....it might help.

Remember...she can't refuse you treatment for a pre-existing condition.

 

Here is a surprise, I don't hate Megyn Kelly. She certainly has sold her soul to the devil or as it is better known FOX, but every once in awhile she lets her intelligence slip and we get quotes like this to the likes of Karl Rove, “Is this just math you do as a Republican to make yourself feel better,”. In a recent interview of Sarah Palin on her new show, Kelly was visibly annoyed by the incoherent word-salad and ping-pong diatribe Palin was spewing. Kelly has a soul, it's just that it is on loan to Lucifer at the moment.

 

Whatever gets you watching Fox News is a good thing.

Although, I'll admit, whenever any of the Fox folks get "snarky" like Rachel Maddow or Keith Olbermann...I shut them off. I hate that!

 

I don't have cable but I do have the internet. Which channel has been busted almost regularly false editing video and audio news feed? Hint: its not Fox

 

I can't say that I "watch" FOX so much as I turn it on and observe the innuendo, unsubstantiated & unquestioned opinions, and long debunked talking points that are a regular part of their programming. If I watch Maddow, Hayes, Schultz, Sharpton or anyone on MSNBC I am just as aware of their bias as when I watch FOX. I just happen to approve of their bias more than I approve of FOX's bias. You and the rest of the RW do exactly the same thing whether you'll ever admit it is another story. Watching someone that doesn't agree with your biases is much more grating on your nerves especially if they happen to be making an argument you can't intellectually refute even to yourself.
The real difference I see between something like FOX and MSNBC is that I feel like FOX insults my intelligence mostly because they aren't trying to convince me per se but rather convince those that require little in the way of burden of proof. I have watched them go from baseless innuendo to stating something as fact within one sentence and their audience will never question such flimsy journalism. MSNBC makes you unpack their long lead-ups and often I see why they come to the conclusions they come to but sometimes I'd like a little more in the way of direct evidence. In other words, MSNBC makes me have to think while something like FOX insists that I don't think. That best explains my perspective and to be perfectly honest, I don't watch either all that much.

 

Well, Kelly is pretty far out there and devoid of anything other than made up facts, so of course she rated high with fox viewers. Not rocket science here folks.

 

One of the two of you has got to be wrong. Considering the proof we have, it does not take long (for most of us) to figure out which it is.

 

http://www.newscorpse.com/ncWP/?p=2146

She sees no distinction between fact and fiction. But convincing those who watch fox news this is like explaining red to the blind.

 

No one...not even Fox News...disagrees with Liberal social goals. Conservatives only question Government's role and how to fund them responsibly.

Liberals obviously feel that there is a class of citizens that have accrued assets in excess of what they need to survive and should be compelled to share any excess with others.

Fine...pass a law that compels ALL citizens to donate some percentage of their income to any private charity of their choice and let those charities compete for donations. Why does Government need to administer these programs or decide where the money goes? Let the people decide...it's their money. Get the politicians and corruption out of the loop.