Video you will NOT SEE: 10,000+ Muslims yelling: "Death to America"

Discussion in 'Religion' started by Midas, Aug 29, 2006.

  1. Midas

    Midas New Member

    Watch this short 1 minute and 24 second clip concerning the enemy WE are fighting. You will NOT see it on the evening news, but you will see it throughout the muslim world. It truly shows the people we are fighting and WHY we must kill all of these jihadists:

    http://www.youtube.com/p.swf?video_...UXF0/2.jpg&t=OEgsToPDskKLsEl1_yx_loF9Sd-z5YSJ

    From the moment muslim children can walk, they are being rasied to HATE!!

    Now...To those muslims, the silent and invisible, who truly are peaceful, or moderate, and tolerant of others unlike yourselves, who are opposed to the deadly militancy of islamic jihad and islamic imperialism, whoever you are, wherever you are, it is time for YOU to wake up and take on the cancer that is growing in your religion.

    But a religion is what its believers say it is. In any age the nature and substance of any religion is defined by those who are most strident and assertive in saying what it is. And in this age it is the islamic resistance Movement, the voices of Puritanical islam, the islam of jihad against the unbelievers and infidels, all the Jews, Christians, Buddhists, Hindus, the Democracies, and all the others, that define islam for the world. Perhaps one day the silent and invisible non-militant Muslims will become an outspoken and visible majority, and then the dialectic of islam will be forced to change and join the 21st Century.

    That day can't come fast enough, not in my LIFE time...but hopefully sooner than later.
     
  2. Bonedigger

    Bonedigger Another Wandering Celt

    Truer words were never spoken...

    Changing that mindset is a problem from inception as well. Accepted worldwide general knowledge is looked upon in a negative light as it draws one farther from god. That's the way they've been wired for THOUSANDS of years. In other words if you broaden your mind to other ideas/beliefs you will go to hell...
     
  3. Guardian

    Guardian New Member

    All I can say is this is sick, really sick! I didn't think any adult would do this to a child. I don't know what else to say.
     
  4. Danr

    Danr New Member

    If this is a "war" than they seem to be winning the political side which is much more important than the military side.
     
  5. jwevansv

    jwevansv All-knowing

    No, Danr, they are perceived to be winning because of dolts like yourself. The military side will win if you give War a Chance!
     
  6. Danr

    Danr New Member

    We do not have pro gov't rallys like that. Usually only occupied nations muster that sort of passion.
    BTW the political side is where wars are won and lost.

    Once boots hit the ground we lost ( that is pretty obvious).
     
  7. peachymargarita

    peachymargarita New Member

    Yeah. This look pretty political eh?

    [​IMG]
     
  8. Danr

    Danr New Member

  9. Guardian

    Guardian New Member

    O.K. Danr, I 've looked at the four threads you posted and to tell the truth, I just don't get it. Would you be so kind as to explain what your meanding was in relationship to :
    A. the first thread was Korea waiving flags in celebration.
    B. the second thread was a bunch of Chinamen marching and showing off something.
    C. what they call the spirit of 76 with the fife, drum and flag being carried.
    D. Picture of Ghandi

    I'm sure I'll find this interesting.
     
  10. Danr

    Danr New Member

    Korea????? (sorry I did assume a certain knowledge of history and geography)


    those represent 4 wars where the political work trumped the military work. The Chinesse one represents the CCCP victory.
     
  11. Guardian

    Guardian New Member

    Come on now Danr, your not going to tell me that the War for Independance never really happened, are you?

    What do you think old Geroge was doing out in that boat they pictured on one of the new state quarters. I dont think they were fishing.
     
  12. Danr

    Danr New Member


    hearts and minds won those 4. Yes it tooks hearts and minds to win the American revolution, and old George in fact was excellent with political work.
     
  13. peachymargarita

    peachymargarita New Member

    Which war did the Mahatma win??? The war on hunger?
     
  14. Guardian

    Guardian New Member

    Not to mention more than a little blood and guts, right Danr? Or don't that count?


    What war do you think Mahatma Gandhi (more correctly 'Mohandas karamchand Gandhi') get involved with? I though that he was the dude that Martin Luther King patterned his life after. Strictly and totally non-violance, civil-rights & freedom were his bag. Or don't I know my history again?
    Actually Gandhi just happened to be in the right place and at the right time to practice his vegitarian style of living, and being a lawyer from the English School system he knew how to talk a Eskimo out of a pop-cycle! Exactly like our preacher King.
     
  15. rambozo

    rambozo New Member

    "Video you will NOT SEE: 10,000+ Muslims yelling: "Death to America"

    i saw it. was anyone else unable to see this video. you all had you computer monitors on right? hmm :D

    lol jk

    i for one think this shows a great untapped resource. if these people are so easy to take orders just think of the possibilities. these kids would make the cutest little worker drones. or like just tell them allah wants 10 million pairs of nikes assembled and shipped to the great satans retail stores.

    we can beat these guys the capitalist way.
     
  16. De Orc

    De Orc Well-Known Member

    Actualy guy's dont sell Danr short on this one, hearts & minds are very important and propaganda has a big part to play in defeating this terror campaign.
    America lost in Vietnam because the politicos listend to all the anti Vietnam properganda put out by the press world wide, they tied the hands of those who were in a position to win.
    Dont allow it to happen again, in WWII all sides used propeganda to great sucess (yep even the Germans, just look how many forigners joined the Waffen SS) We used it as well to aggitated in the occupied countries and of course to promote the war effort at home.
    At the moment no matter what we in the west (UK/USA/Canada/Germany) (Yep Canada & Germany are active in Afghanistan in case you did not know) we are seen as been wrong and the poor downtroden Muslims are right. Put this right by sending good stories to your local paper ie US troops build School in Iraq, it can work.

    De Orc :kewl:
     
  17. Cloudsweeper99

    Cloudsweeper99 New Member

    The Vietnam War is much more popular now than it was while it was going on. It is incredible how similar the present conflict is becomming to that time period. If you get the opportunity, watch some of the old news coverage from the 1960s on the History Channel or Discovery Channel. President Bush utters some of the same phrases as LBJ used to justify the war, virtually word for word. It's spooky.

    [For any readers who have reading comprehension deficiencies, the above paragraph does not take a political stance for or against either war. It's merely an observation of public and political behavior.]
     
  18. Danr

    Danr New Member

    this thing is now a civil war. We must back away slowly, any other action could create problems on a level that we did not anticipate.
     
  19. Cloudsweeper99

    Cloudsweeper99 New Member

    It's easy to anticipate. As we back away, Iran moves in and creates a Shiite client state out of southern Iraq, and controls their oil fields, and maybe Kuwait too eventually. If we stay, we continue to bleed. Iran is a pretty smart enemy, and not to be underestimated. They are a lot like the North Vietnamese. Bush did them a favor by replacing the secular dictatorship in Iraq with a mostly Shiite Islamic govenment sympathetic to Iran. The sectarian violence, civil war, terrorist actions or whatever else you want to lable what is going on in Iraq definitely works to Iran's advantage and probably happens at their instruction. Iran also probably staged the recent conflict in Lebanon to demonstrate to Israel and the USA that their new military tactics enable them to absorb horrific air strikes and still put up fierce ground resistance. So the military planners in the Pentagon now have to figure that they will need a lot more troops if they plan to invade Iran [maybe more than they have without a draft], and they also probably realize that air power alone will be insufficient to win while further isolating the US.

    So here we sit with choices similar to Viet Nam. We can stay and waste the national treasure and lives of our military in trying to outlast them with the status quo while fending of the inevitable future peace marches in Washington. We can try to pass responsibility to the new Iraqi government which has as much loyalty to Iran as to the US. It's the equivalent of what was once called "vietnamization" of the war. It failed then and probably will fail now. We can "cut and run" with some modern replays of the images of helicopters pulling the last American's out of the country from the roof of the embassy while enemy troops close in. We can escallate, with massive destruction of every military and civilian infrastructure and population center. As they said in Viet Nam, "to save the village, we had to destroy it." A few nutcases even suggest that "small" nuclear weapons might prove useful. There's no telling where that will lead, but expect somewhere from thousands to millions of dead Americans over the next few decades in retalliation if that happens.

    Many people warned us not to go into Iraq. Bush's father warned the son, but the son wanted to accomplish what the father failed to do. The psychiatrists can probably have a field day with that one. The only way to ensure a favorable outcome from something like this is to avoid it in the first place. It is too late for that now, and it is possible that there is no reasonably acceptable solution to the problem. If there is, I don't know what it is. One of the news networks had a retired general on TV as an analyst in the days leading up to the invasion of Iraq. His comment was something to the effect that if the US invades Iraq, the eventual outcome will either be a stalemate or a loss for us, so we shouldn't get involved. He was never invited back. Too bad because the old guy had more insight than everyone inside the beltway, combined.
     
  20. jwevansv

    jwevansv All-knowing

    Avoid confrontations and avoid taking military action when we are attacked! LIBERAL!! You have no backbone Cloudass! So much ignorance from your mouth it is pathetic. You are a patsy!
     

Share This Page