Palin, Bush II, and Cheney NOT Speaking in Tampa.

Discussion in 'Politics' started by JoeNation, Aug 13, 2012.

  1. JoeNation
    No Mood

    JoeNation The ReichWing Abuser

    Question: What is it that Republicans are trying to forget anyway?
    Answer: Everything prior to January 2009.


    Sarah Palin has announced that she will not be speaking at the 2012 Republican National Convention, saying it’s time to give others a chance.

    “This year is a good opportunity for other voices to speak at the convention and I’m excited to hear them,” she said in a statement to Fox News’s Greta van Susteren.

    The announcement comes as Palin, who was the big-ticket item at the 2008 convention as the party’s vice presidential nominee, seeks to find a place for herself in a Republican Party whose establishment is wary of her unpopularity. Similarly, former president George W. Bush and former vice president Dick Cheney, who could also pose problems for the GOP by speaking at the convention, will not appear.

    Palin reiterated that she fully supports Mitt Romney and his new running mate, Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), but said that she will focus her efforts on electing Republicans to Congress.

    “As I’ve repeatedly said, I support Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan in their efforts to replace President Obama at the ballot box, and I intend to focus on grassroots efforts to rally independents and the GOP base to elect Senate and House members so a wise Congress is ready to work with our new president to get our country back on the right path,” she wrote.

    Here’s the full statement:

    “…Everything I said at the 2008 convention about then-candidate Obama still stands today, and in fact the predictions made about the very unqualified and inexperienced Community Organizer’s plans to “fundamentally transform” our country are unfortunately coming true. This year is a good opportunity for other voices to speak at the convention and I’m excited to hear them. As I’ve repeatedly said, I support Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan in their efforts to replace President Obama at the ballot box, and I intend to focus on grassroots efforts to rally Independents and the GOP base to elect Senate and House members so a wise Congress is ready to work with our new President to get our country back on the right path. This is imperative. As President Clinton said in 2008 while candidate Obama and lapdogs in the media were thrashing his wife’s record and reputation, this is “…the biggest fairy tale.” For the sake of America’s solvency and sovereignty we must close this nonsensical book in November…”-
     
  2. CoinOKC
    Fiendish

    CoinOKC T R U M P

    I would say that Romney doesn't require the assistance of previous Republican luminaries as opposed to Obama who is having "Bubba" Clinton speak at the Dem convention. Obama is going to need all the help he can get. The only question I have is why Obama is having a lying, adulterating, impeached president speak on his behalf. Go figure!
     
  3. David

    David Proud Enemy of Hillary

    Because that's a resume the libs respect! They sure enjoy bashing a successful devout family man, don't they?
     
  4. JoeNation
    No Mood

    JoeNation The ReichWing Abuser

    Interesting parisan spins.
     
  5. Andy

    Andy Well-Known Member

    Smart move. Instead of focusing on Romney and Ryan, the media would find stories to attack those three be it a democrat planned demonstration to the dress palin would have been wearing. If R&R are going to win they are going to have to have the focus on them and then make that focus on how screwed up our economy is right now.
     
  6. David

    David Proud Enemy of Hillary

    Maybe the tax cheats were busy?
     
  7. clembo

    clembo Well-Known Member

    Well Andy.

    This is the most intelligent response I've seen yet.

    Others here want to counter by attacking a select few Democrats. Old hat. Same old boring hat.
     
    3 people like this.
  8. CoinOKC
    Fiendish

    CoinOKC T R U M P

    I'm sure Obama could give Tim Geithner the day off.
     
  9. JoeNation
    No Mood

    JoeNation The ReichWing Abuser

    So you're chiding Geithner for issues with his taxes when he was required to show them as Secretary of the Treasury but you think it is OK for Romney to hide his finances? Why the double standard? There certainly are people that can call out Geithner for his tax issues but those supporting Romney really don’t have a leg to stand on in that argument.
     
  10. David

    David Proud Enemy of Hillary

    Let's be intellectually honest here...

    Geithner is a self-confessed tax cheat.
    Romney is the victim of campaign season innuendo by an anonymous source

    See the difference here? I thought you might.

    **by the way, bravo to Romney for refusing to fall for the lefts feeble attempts to find another way to distract voters away from BO's failed record as president.
     
    2 people like this.
  11. JoeNation
    No Mood

    JoeNation The ReichWing Abuser

    You got my sides splitting with the first sentence. Nice one! :D
     
  12. JoeNation
    No Mood

    JoeNation The ReichWing Abuser

    And that would bring us right back to why our economy is screwed up and Romney has no intention of having the fact that the wealthy in this country are paying nothing in taxes while earning billions, his budget gives people like him another tax break, and taxes the average middle class worker an extra $2000 annually while cutting Medicare and Social Security. I don't think Romney wants to go there.
     

Share This Page