Now that a third of the States have legalized marijuana usage, should the feds legalize it's medical use also? I have not allowed "public display" of the votes for those who wish to remain anonymous. I confess I cast the first vote, and it was "Yes".
As someone that worked inan oncology ward in college, I saw the benefits to the patients. This is a no-brainer.
I did not vote but just made a post. I like this tread and hopefully this thread will not just become another insult fest for I would rather be civil myself. On the one hand it is a no brainer for medical usage regarding chemo patients,etc.. The problem with this that it will create doctor dealers. It should become legal on a federal level but with strict restrictions on what the prescription should be filled out for or milllions will be written for stress etc. Now the bigger question is should the government legalize the use of the product mentioned with various restrictions. This is a debate that should take place and this is coming from someone who has perhaps a drink every year or so. I am very anti drug but we have to be realistic and objective as a nation. This is why we need Statesmen or Stateswomen and not these flunky politicans causing hate and division in our nation from both the democratic and republican parties.
No problem Andy, it's absolutely your right to not vote, and civil comments are always welcome. I don't believe another flame war will be sparked here...stoners are too busy thinking about nachos and that ice-cold, refreshing Mountain Dew sitting on that shelf in their 'fridge... it's calling to them... it's callllllinnnng... ...Dang it! It back-fired on me, I gotta get ...that ice-cold, refreshing Dew... ...and besides, I made a promise to the mods that I would end my part in the recent stupidity-fest, and have done so...and Coin has apparently clicked the "ignore" button as well. Strictly speaking, this poll is on whether or not the Feds should legalize marijuana's use as a medicine. Any federal law would have those restrictions spelled out... and they would be scrutinized and compromised all through the process, which would be brutal and endless...so that is a given. But, we are once again at polar opposites to each other, Andy. This time for the use of non-prescriptive, non-pharmacutical "drugs" (relating to it's use as an intoxicant, as with alcohol) as entertainment. As for alcohol, ....which is IMO a far more dangerous drug than marijuana, and by leaps and bounds.... I too rarely drink anymore, now that smoking cigarettes is banned in bars ( an insane law IMO), and the fact that I have no real desire for consuming it in the first place.... except in bars lol But to make it clear, Andy: A "Yes" vote on this poll is not a "Yes" vote on decriminalization... which is what you appear to be saying you oppose. For the record, I also support decriminalization. In my opinion, marijuana has alcohol's intoxicating effects, but is far safer to use.
I am not against decriminalization of marijuana. But 1. Medical use - Be very careful for we have too many pill pushing doctors already. Just look how Ritlain and Pain killers were abused. 2. We have to be realistic and careful when we go down the street of decriminalization as well as have a line clearly definining what is acceptable and what is criminal regarding all drugs as well as the advertising of such. With that said I am anti-drug except for medical reasons but realize that what is idealistic and what is realistic must be addressed.
I don't smoke it but, over the years, I have come to the decision that Marijuana should be legal for any use. Regulate it like alcohol.
I agree with you Stu. If it should ever become legal, regulating it like alcohol would be acceptable to me...as a compromise though. Although I believe it is nowhere near as harmful as alcohol, I can understand the issue a lot of people would have with anyone under the age of 21 using it, though I personally would lower the legal age to 18...as with cigarettes. I'm of the opinion that, if you can join the military at age 18...the "age of adulthood" in America...smoking, drinking, etc. should be considered adult behaviors as well. The issue is that some States insisted on upping the "age" for those "entertainment pursuits" to 21...with the feds eventually agreeing. So, you are an adult at 18, with adult responsibilities and benefits... with the exception of a few select entertainment options. That's a bit silly to me lol ...but I can also see it as the compromise between those who believe no one at all should be smoking and drinking & those who believe those pursuits are a right.
They are talking about legalizing some forms of it over here for those in chronic pain, the latest idea is in a form of a spray. Now I know it eases my pain so I am for it
About 40 years ago a friend of my mother had breast cancer and went through Chemo. She was horribly sick from that so her kids (high school) were buying weed for her. It made it a lot easier for her. I KNOW her kids weren't using it but still they were breaking the law to make her feel better. She was breaking the law by smoking it. Jump to the present. We have a customer that is 84 years old and sharp as a tack. His sister DOES grow it for medicinal purposes legally. If I said I never smoked it I'd be lying and, unlike Bill Clinton, I DID inhale. The regulation would be an issue though because believe me the 84 year old customer is still smoking. I'm coming up on 50 and my one co worker is. So we're from the age group in which a LOT of people smoked pot or at least you knew the aroma. The other folks at work are all around 70. There have been several occasions when the 84 year old has come in dragging a cloud. You'd never know it and our older co workers have no clue until he leaves and us two "youngsters" comment on his "cologne". Just legalize it, regulate it and tax it. We'd save money on part of our "war on drugs" and pump in tax revenues.
One of my close friends died of cancer in his twenties and the government gave him pot in pill form to help in the treatment process. He needed it.
What I have read is that as long as you pick them "fresh" they are legal. You simply can't dry them and then use them. Some sort of loophole in the law.
I am all for it. Have a sick family member in Detroit and the weed seems to be the only thing that helps him.
*Bump* (To the Administrators) : I know, I know......"bumps" should be used sparingly (if ever). (gulps nervously)...Be gentle... (the poll ends within two weeks).
