Just which case are you talking about? Solyndra? Fiskars? Fast and Furious? Lanny Breuer? Every one of them is a matter of public record, so just what words did I put in anyone's mouth?
(laughs)... Reeeeally? My post (#33) to your post (#34) is what I'm talking about. I made no mention of CBS being right-wing, which you attributed to me. How you made the connection is why I called you on that. I'm just saying let's not be so obtuse... unless it's funny. Ok, I laughed so I guess I can leave it at that.
Those posts are exactly what I was talking about in post #41. Those are the "scandals" I have posted about Obama (unless you want to go back to Ayers and Wright). So again I ask, "so just what words did I put in anyone's mouth?"
"CBS is right-wing?"... when I never said CBS was right -wing. How are we not understanding each other here? But whatever, since CBS posted the story you are refering to, I see how you'd think I'd say CBS is right wing... except I didn't. So that part, where you say I called CBS right-wing is the point. I never said it, you said I did. See?
Now a 3rd woman has come forward accusing Cain of sexually inappropriate behavior in the workplace which consisted of him inviting her to his place. Oops! Flames.
It is really quite simple. It is for the same reasons that you post things about the various candidates even though there isn't a nominee. It is to make any of the candidates look like bad as it makes the whole lot, and by extension the whole party, look like stooges or hicks or corrupt or sexual predators or whatever. It does nothing but benefit the Democrats to make all the choices of the Republican party look bad while they are in the spotlight and especially if they are gaining any kind of momentum or press. This isn't rocket surgery to figure out.
Really? We have had someone here refer to Cain as a 'token' of the Republicans. I can't think of a more denigrating thing to say about a black man than that unless it would be House Negro (which is about the same thing) or Uncle Tom.
No matter how you slice it folks it looks like Cain is toast. Methinks the Republicans better get used to backing Romney.
Sure, plenty! Was it Paula Jones? Maybe Kathleen Willey? Possibly Monica Lewinsky? All those ladies mentioned probably still have a sex drive. And they were attracted to politicians. We haven't heard from them in a while. They might be making a comeback (no pun intended).
And the plot thickens.... http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...aign-over-sexual-harrassment-allegations.html
Well, Stu and the rest, it seems that you have underestimated once again just how low Republicans will go. Did Karl Rove teach you nothing? You need to break out the large dinner plate for this helping of crow. Just as I said, It was Rick Perry that had the most to gain from this leak and now we have Cain accusing the Perry camp of exactly what I predicted. You know this isn't so tough to figure out. You simply have to follow the trail of lack of morals and ethics right to the doors they always lead to. The stupid and the corrupt always leave an obvious path to their own doorsteps.
A. It is absolutely consistant, it was not a liberal, it was a Republican "like" Karl Rove who is a Republican. B. How would you know what "people believe"? and C. If you actually have a point that doesn't involve, "Hey man, you were absoultely right", you are an absolute fool. You and the entire Fox News channel, Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter, and every other Con that blamed the Democrats for your own party's lack of morals. Now eat that crow!!! Your party are absolutely pathetic.
So you did not say it was Rove? And the Cain blamed the liberals? And I am still waiting for proof of anything happening.
Again. Cain is toast and Perry for that matter most likely although Cain's early departure may give Perry somewhat of a boost. Amongst the sexual allegations Cain has shown himself to be a genius on foreign policy. NOT!!! He perceives China as a military threat because they may be working on nuclear devices and more aircraft carriers. http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_...uggests-china-doesnt-have-nuclear-capability/ "In an interview Monday, Cain said part of China's threat to the United States stems from its attempts to develop nuclear weapons -- even though China tested its first nuclear weaponin 1964. "Yes, they're a military threat," Cain said on the PBS NewsHour, in response to a question from Judy Woodruff. "They've indicated that they're trying to develop nuclear capability and they want to develop more aircraft carriers like we have. So yes, we have to consider them a military threat." With a brilliant statement like that why would Perry have to waste his time?