What Was Your Impression of the Debate 9-7-11

Indeed. Homo Erectus and Homo Ergaster are extinct. Debate still continues whether or not Homo Habilis is a direct human ancestor. Homo Sapien is the only surviving species of the Homo genus. Are you suggesting there are people walking the earth today who are not Homo Sapiens? Well, let me cut you off right there; all of us are Homo Sapiens. So, regardless of whether or not you wish to categorize people into certain groups based on their skin tone, I have news for you: We're all the same. We all started in the same place. We all live on the same planet. We're all related to each other. I don't believe in discriminating based on skin tone, because discrimination leads to prejudice and that's just something I don't adhere to. If you think differently, well, that's your business but I want no part of it.

 

How dare you accuse me of been a Racist, I made no such assertion that you could discriminate against anyone based on skin tone or that any one should be discriminated against in any way I demand a bloody apology from you for that you realy have sunk to a new low saying such a thing

 

Heck, who here hasn't been accused of being racist? It ought to be the Official Forum Label.

 

You might be fine with someone accusing you of been a Racist David but I am not

 

I also Never said that a white person could trace there Ancestry back to Northern europe what I actual said was and I quote

A person with white skin will more than likely trace there ancestery back to Northern

So another twisting of my words

As for my stating "A person with Black skin will most likely trace therse back to Africa and a person with Yellow skin to Asia" again that is scientific fact nothing to do with Racism

Would you care to try and twist any more of my words to suite you?

 

When did I say I was "fine" with it? I merely stated it was a common practice on this forum.

 

What is wrong with you people? are you incapable of understanding a simple comment? I said YOU MIGHT BE FINE WITH IT!! I never said that you had stated you were, did I why cant you just for once stop trying to twist everything a person says!

 

If you are trying to refer to my posts, I copied your words and pasted them in my one post and quoted your post in the other. They are an exact quote of what you said, word for word spelling included. I did add [sic] to indicate that those misspellings were as you originally wrote them and not my mistake in copying them.

As for your second accusation, I in no way accused you of being a racist. I do, however, agree with CoinOKC in saying that you cannot ascertain with any great certainty a person's origins by looking at a picture of this person.

 

Why would you say "you might be fine with it" then?

 

This is for David why would you assume I said that you had said it? when clearly I said NO such thing, why is it you can not answer a simple question without trying to turn it against someone?

This is for RC I was responding to CO Why do you assume I was responding to You?
as for my spelling why bring that up is this a spelling test? I suffer from word blindness told you all this more than once

I stated at the start of this that you can NOT be discriminating against a person by commenting on the possible origins of there ancestors this is based on scientific facts which so far No one has disproved but CO is the one who decided to take issue with that rather simple statement

 

Good luck with that. I'd suggest alcohol but then you might start screaming at the screen and then you'll drink more and more and eventually you'll wind up naked in your neighbor's bushes. The neighbor's hate that. Try yoga.

 

Why? Because we cannot follow your though processes and you refuse to quote the thread you are referencing.

 

Yeah, I'll have to second rlm on this one.
You said "You (meaning me) may be fine with it"....exactly what does that mean? Are you implying that I accept it? If so, what gives you that idea?

 

You know what I couldn't be bothered wasting any more of my time on your stupidity David You twist and evade every question put to you. You really would make a consummate politician

 

I just want to know the answer. If you are unable to answer in a calm, reasonable just say so.

 

......

DAVID ADMITS HE PREFERS TO BE UNREASONABLE.

...It was implied...

 

I didn't call you a racist so you certainly will not be receiving an apology from me, much less a bloody one. If you can, however, ascertain a person's heritage/ancestry/ethnicity from the color of their skin, well, then I applaud you since you are obviously quite gifted. You've stated that "whites" (again, your word - not mine) identify with Northern European heritage and "yellows" (once again, your word - not mine) identify with an Asiatic heritage. Like I said previously, you must be omniscient if you're able to determine that based upon the color of their skin. I don't attempt to discriminate based on a person's skin color nor do I try to categorize them as originating from a certain geographical location on the globe. Homo Sapiens originated in Africa and that's that. If some human beings as opposed to other human beings have gathered more melanin in their skin along the way, so what?

I can't believe you would accuse me of accusing you of being a racist. I demand an apology, bloody or otherwise.

 

And yet again you lie

I stated and I quote

A person with white skin will more than likely trace there ancestery back to Northern Europe

I did not as you say state that they Identify with europe/Asia or any other area but you try rewriting it as a matter of course LOL

I have to admit I never did expect you to have the decency to admit that you twisted my words to suit your own agenda you simply woudnt have the courage LOL

 

Just for my own information, what are you trying to say the difference is between "trace there[sic] ancestery back to Northern Europe" and "identify with Northern European heritage"?

 

You stated I said something that I did not and that makes you a liar
Yes there is a difference I said "will more than likely" that does not say that they Identify nor does it say that they definitely are from any given area, it says that they might be but you decided to twist that for your own agenda
You lied about what I said and have continued to do so throught this thread, you Also said "I don't believe in discriminating based on skin tone, because discrimination leads to prejudice and that's just something I don't adhere to. If you think differently, well, that's your business but I want no part of it." I have Never once stated that I believe in any kind of discrimination but You decided that I have therfore insinuating that I am a Racist

So try to twist it whatever way you want you lied