It was my understanding that Obama wasn't on the stage when Hoffa, private citizen, made his speech much less introduced Obama. Do you have information that says otherwise? I haven't seen any schedule of the event’s speakers so I don't know who introduced who but I did hear that Obama didn’t hear Hoffa's remarks before he took the stage 20 minutes later. What was it Jay Carney his press secretary said? "The president wasn’t there — I mean, he wasn’t on stage. He didn’t speak for another 20 minutes. He didn’t hear it. I really don’t have any comment beyond that" But now you seem to have Hoffa introducing the president. Is it just possible that all those little facts are just jumbled up in your little head? Are you just choosing to ignore the Fox Breitbarting of the speech on purpose or do you think it is OK for them to misrepresent what Hoffa actually said? I mean you do it so often yourself, I can't imagine that you'd have a problem with Fox doing it too. Heck, I figured that’s where you learned it.
http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/2...ndra_bernhard_issues_gang_rape_warning-2.html http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/11/paul-kanjorski-rick-scott-shot_n_807608.html http://dailycaller.com/2011/01/19/m...-suffocate-rush-limbaugh-with-his-throat-fat/ http://www.foundingbloggers.com/wor...s-links-to-plo-operatives-sympathy-for-hamas/ http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/06/28/alan_grayson_effect http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/06/28/alan_grayson_effect There is every one of them. Now try to get moen to reciprocate with his wild accusations.
They no more misrepresented Hoffa's speech than you did with the posts I showed you of yours and I wish I could find some others, but Peter has not yet seen fit to update the data base.
As a matter of fact it was Ghana Goodwin-Dye that introduced Obama at the Labor Day event not Hoffa. Wrong again eh rimmy?
I have no life. I was debating on whether or not to 'like' your comment for about a minute. Ultimately, it was the rarity of the words that convinced me LOL
Yeah, and if you think it's everyone else's fault you have no life and "they" are out to get you, you are a tomc.
I don't really have a problem with Hoffa telling people to "vote the SOBs" out of office. I think union members should vote that SOB out. I also think they should vote the SOB, Richard Trumka out. I think they should vote every union boss SOB out. I also think they should vote every liberal SOB out. I think they should vote every Democrat SOB out. I think they should vote every Socialist SOB out, too. I think there should be a new slogan, "Vote every Democrat, Liberal, Socialist, Leftie, Communist and Union Boss SOB out".
I have a major problem with Hoffa's speech - so long as the lefties object to Palin's cross hairs. I did not have a problem with Palin's cross hairs and my only problem with Hoffa's word are that the left does not have a problem with them. I do not even see how they can ignore it after all the fuss they made with Palin.
Unlikely. I vote for people who show compassion for the less fortunate. I need them to have the ability to see more than one side of an argument. I want them to do what they know is right, not rely on polls or party to show them what's right. These things are hard enough to find in a Democrat... and even more difficult to find in a Republican candidate. Not impossible, but much more difficult because of their upbringing. If you are taught to hate liberals or Democrats all your early life, it's hard for you to overcome that. I was raised to be more open-minded, and try every day to keep it that way. So yeah, I could vote Republican, but I'd need to see that they qualify as being reasonable. I'm still waiting lol
I think republicans define compassion as their ability to tolerate those of lesser wealth. Far as waiting...I hope you don't have any other plans. LOL
I guess the labor thugs understood the message from Hoffa & BO: http://news.yahoo.com/longshoremen-storm-wash-state-port-damage-rr-144921214.html
What's the deal with constantly calling RLM a "coward", but never presenting a contrary point-of-view? Just curious....
Fair enough. It stems from his/her lack of wanting or even being able to see a different point of view. When something is so easy prove and he lies and refuses to look at evidence that is provided for him/her, (s)he is just a smiveling little coward. Why bother responding in any other way to his/her blinders. It is just pointless to make factual statements (s)he cannot see. There is no point of view (s)he can see other than his/her own.
What? Because you will not support your point of view? Again, you are proving your blog describes you perfectly "Our schools do not teach people to think critically and to argue rationally." Now please answer the questions I have asked you;