Liberal Keith Olbermann leaves MSNBC

My friend, you're going to find in favor of the right, regardless of what I can show here. But for 2004, I was referring to Cuyahoga county. In 2000, it was Florida that was the center for fraud. My mistake. It all muddles together after awhile, you know, Bush, republicans, fraud, manipulated bogus supreme court elections, etc.
Regardless, below are some links to 2004's fraud consisting of Diebold's (now Premiere Election Systems) manipulation/fraud, also one circuit court's original lawsuits (one of many) highlighting the said fraud perpetrated on behalf of the republican party, as well as specific claims that were made at the time. It's all been "corporatized" over now with wads of cash as is the norm, but it doesn't change the facts any. It just helps keep anybody from talking about it. So, believe what you like sir, but your beloved republican party is one big, complete, fraud, of which, you gladly participate in.
In conclusion....the 2000, and the 2004 elections were both stolen by factions on the right. Whether or not you accept or admit to such, changes nothing. Good day.

    US voting procedures — Election corruption     The WE News Archives    

The Daily Page | Madison, Wisconsin • View topic - Diebold settles Ohio lawsuit over voting machines

http://boe.cuyahogacounty.us/pdf_boe/en-US/history/2004/030204_PE_Canvass.txt

http://www.electionfraudnews.com/Articles/2004/Declaration.pdf

 

Link#1 states "Immediately following the election, 562,498 votes were reported cast in Cuyahoga County, with 30,791 listed as absentee or provisional ballots. But the official results show just 468,056 counted." See Link#4 and my oficial vote count.

Link #2 has to do with western Ohio. Nothing to do with Cuyahoga county save for 1,777 votes with no proof of anything.

Nothing like useless data. Why do I care that 5111 MAPLE HTS 1-A 6 who voted for JUDGE COMMON PLEAS COURT (JUVENILE DIV)(F.T.C. 1-2-2005) Vote for 1 01 = KRISTIN W. SWEENEY? Really! Oh! And it is all the primary elections to boot. Please tell me what that has to do with anything. That takes care of link #3.

Some selected tidbits for link#4;

I hold a B.A. in political science from the State University of New York at Potsdam, and an M.A. in history from the University of Oklahoma.
In my professional opinion, the lower turnout in the wards won by Kerry was due directly to a shortage of voting machines.
there were 687,255 ballots cast in Cuyahoga County
I observed 362 ballots in Cuyahoga County which contained two or more punches for president
On behalf of Rolling Stone magazine, and with the assistance of Troy Seman, I found that 168,169 voters, or 19.44% of the electorate, were purged from the voter rolls in Cuyahoga County on July 6, 2001 and January 5, 2002.

Comments;
Moen does not like him. He is southern educated.
This is Columbus, not Cleveland, but low turnout due to shortage of voting machines. Rally?
See link #1 with 562,498 votes. Somebody is wrong. I found Cuyahoga Kerry = 66.6% 448,486 Bush = 32.9% 221,606 0.5% 3,674. See United States presidential election in Ohio, 2004 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Oh my! Danger. He saw 362 ballots while working for Rolling Stone. There is a political pundit for you. The voters were purged in 2001 and 2002. Aren't they supposed to do that to keep the dead from voting?


In summary, there is nothing I could find that even remotely approaches or even implies that Bush got more votes that registered voters anywhere or any time.

This is the one and only time I will go through all your BS to show you there is absolutely nothing to what you are trying to prove.

 

Of course you didn't. Yeah this is my one and only time too, to prove that the right wing will defend its party no matter what and admit nothing. I knew that going in, but I figured, "what the hell". Your party is beyond corrupt, and you reflect your party's mindset perfectly. Thanks for playin'.

 

Tom, you've been proven wrong, just admit it. People here are open-minded and will listen to valid arguments, but when misinformation is thrown at them, they see it for what it is. You're still upset because Gore lost in 2000 and you just can't get over it. Oh well. RLM is right and any impartial observer can see that. Hang it up on this one, buddy.

 

I'm still upset over 2000. Yeah, that's it. If it wasn't for 2000, I'd have complete trust in the right wing lunatic fringe. Thanks bud. Got it!. People see exactly what they want to see, most especially on the right. I've already "hung up" on the ostrich mentality. I'm curious though...how do you ignore misinformation, yet consider Fox news to be a valid source of information? Oh yeah....they say what you want them to say and you hear what you want to hear. Never mind.

 

I'm sorry to burst your bubble, but I watch all the news sources. As a matter of fact, I watch considerably more MSNBC than I do FOX. Oh, and here's a suggestion for you. If you'd watch less Sesame Street and more news outlets you might be able to form a valid argument sometime. See ya, Oscar!

 

Thanks Ernie. See ya.

 

Anybody ever heard of a network called Current TV? Me either but apparently Al Gore owns it & dOlbermann is going to become his partner (officially).
Sounds like a solid plan to grow a low-rated network....partner one clown with another.

 

Never heard of it. And probably never will.

 

Never heard of it either. And I mean never. Must have been the only place he could go with his non-compete clause or something.

 

oops

 

It looks like even Al Gore couldn't stand Olbermann anymore. Actually, I don't know what losers were watching this liberal idiot, but it appears there weren't very many.

Current TV severs ties with Keith Olbermann

(CNN) -- Current TV's co-founders, including former Vice President Al Gore, announced Friday that the network has ousted its highest-profile on-air personality, Keith Olbermann.

"Current was ... founded on the values of respect, openness, collegiality and loyalty to our viewers," Gore and Joel Hyatt wrote in an "open letter" to viewers on the network's website. "Unfortunately these values are no longer reflected in our relationship with Keith Olbermann, and we have ended it."

Olbermann responded sharply in a series of Twitter messages Friday, saying that for more than a year he has been "imploring" Gore and Hyatt "to resolve our issues internally." He did not specify what those issues were.
"Nevertheless, Mr. Gore and Mr. Hyatt, instead of abiding by their promises and obligations and investing in a quality news program, finally thought it was more economical to try to get out of my contract," the left-wing news personality wrote.

"It goes almost without saying that the claims against me in Current's statement are untrue and will be proved so in the legal actions I will be filing against them presently," Olbermann added, vowing later that the "truth of the ethics" of Gore and Hyatt eventually "will come out." (Hmmmmm.. I wonder what those "ethics" might be)...

http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/30/showbiz/current-tv-olbermann/index.html?eref=mrss_igoogle_cnn

 

Olberman would have thrived under Stalin's thought police and that lady who replaced him reminds me of a nazi. Wonder if she even realizes it under her smugness. Can't take more then a minute of her when surfing the stations.