I wonder if there's anyone else here who's starting to feel like this.... I think I have more in common with people like David and Moen, than I do with my representative to Congress who supposedly lives just a few miles from me. Even though David and Moen are sworn enemies of one another, I know when you get down to it they're both just regular guys. Ms. Tsongas, OTOH, is the quintessential Washington Insider. She doesn't walk among the people, she lives inside the bubble of our ruling elite who will fight tooth and nail against someone like Julian Assange, but don't give a damn about the regular people like David and Moen. That is the way I feel anyway.
I think government has simply become the mask for huge corporations that pull strings in the background. They are the corrupting influence on our political system and as long as we focus on government as the enemy (which by logical extension it is) they are free to run amok and they have been doing just that. At what point do the American people just stop paying taxes into this corrupt system? I don't mind paying for a government that works for the people but I do mind paying for a government that is owned lock, stock, and barrel by multinationals.
I wouldn't say it's just the corporate interests, but special interests in general. Teachers' unions, for example, are IMO the leading cause of the sorry state of education in our country. They're horrible, and should be ashamed of what they do. But, I can't lay the blame at the corporations, or unions, or any of the other special interests, they're just doing what they need to do. You can't have a "corrupting influence" without corrupt people. Look at Charlie Rangel, for example. Was it the huge corporations that got him? I don't think so, he's a leftie Democrat, not your typical rightie Republican. The only really remarkable thing is that he got outed.
At least teacher's unions represent people, the people that teach our children no less. Who do corporations represent? A small group of shareholders. I'm not giving unions a pass but if you took every cent that unions took in in union dues and threw all that money at lobbying, it wouldn't even represent a tiny fraction of 1% of money that a single industry like big oil could throw into the pot just from a small portion of their annual profits. A single industry! It’s not like unions are gaining ground these days. They are less and less influential year after year. I tend not to worry about the minnows in the water until I know all of the sharks have been taken care of first. I think it is human nature to be corrupted by power and you can't change human nature so your only alternative is to eliminate the corrupting influence. For every Charlie Rangel there is a Tom Delay on the other side. What difference does it make who it is this week? It only proves that anyone can be corrupted and will be if corporations continue to be equal to individuals and money remains equal to free speech. The middle class doesn't stand a chance and we risk becoming less and less relevant to this land everyday we do not take on the powerful elites both in our own government and the corporate oligarchy.
That's just kind of dumb.... and if you want to present it in terms of that, there are far far more people in the USA that are shareholders than there are teachers. Everyone with a 401K, IRA, or any retirement plan, is most likely a shareholder in one of those "evil" corporations you mention. Also, the corporations are represented by their employees, and there are a ton more corporate employees than teachers. And, furthermore, no sane person can argue that the teachers unions have been a force for good, even the ultra far-left liberal elites who made the movie Waiting for Superman recognize the unions are evil.
In other words...all allegiance to the corporate share holders. Unions are evil and corporations are good. Representing the masses is bad and representing the few is the way to go. Is it any wonder why we are where we are?
Hahaha, you libs are pretty good. Not as good as the neocons, though, as we saw this week as Obama bowed in servitude to the Congressional Republicans.
Only if they are publicly traded companies. Not all corporations are bad by any stretch but the ones that create tax loopholes that benefit them exclusively, the ones that reek havoc on the environment, the ones that throw their workers lives away for the sake of profits, the ones that crush innovation because they have a monopoly, gimme a break, you can't be as naive as that to believe that in the quest for profit, anything goes. Corporate greed has outright bought the Republican Party and apparently a good share of the Democratic Party too. How many new business start ups do you see these days? They used to be a regular event but not anymore. Unions are necessary evils in society. Without them we would watch the middle class completely dissapear. Again, focus on the sharks not the minnows.
In the same way that society needs lawyers. Without them, there would be nothing in place to temper their greed. Sad but true.
I think there is little difference between any of the politicians in office. Almost all are beholden to special interests and, of course, their own political survival over anything else. Sure, they try to placate the masses and they take their campaign stances but it really is all just smoke and mirrors. After the elections are done, they forget it all until the next election. Their goal is not the betterment of the country. Their goal is to keep their jobs, their power, their influence and their money. Placate the masses when needed (mostly by throwing some money at them) but just hold onto power at all costs by feeding those special interests. I have felt that way for about 4 years. That was when I first started changing my voting habits.
It like the band " The Who " song from the 70's......" meet the new boss, same as the old boss"....... I feel a real coalescing in this thread, I am glad most of us are starting to realize that partys are not the enemy, the politicians are. The problem, is, how do we fix it?
It's rich versus non rich and the destruction of the middle class, and future generations. It's about wealth extraction from the populous for benefit of the few. It's about greed. It's about power. It's about evil. It's about corporate America strangling the majority of Americans, and it's about corruption. The mega wealthy have won. They own both sides of the political arena and they've successfully terminated the future of America.
Now tom, it is widely known here that you have proclaimed "government is the only way to fix anything". So I'll ask, if government is "owned" by the rich, how does government fix this?
Tom, I don't think it's as easy as saying "Rich vs. Poor" I think it's more those in power viscously defending that power. Take the Old Media vs. New Media struggle going on, as an example. Old Media has gone to the extent of having the government actually taking down websites now without due process, because those websites are deemed a threat to the Old Media elites. Now that we've taken that step, the next step is taking down websites that are political threats. Wikimedia anyone? What's next, this website comes down because I posted that Obama is a Miserable Failure? It's a slippery slope, and this is not directly a Rich vs. Poor thing, a lot of the "Rich" are the New Media who are not full "in" with the powerful elites in Washington like the Old Media are.
Seems to me most of our representatives are rich, were already rich, or soon will be rich. The rich support the rich and govern accordingly. It's all about rich versus poor more now than it ever was. Sad but true. IMO...that's why there is now such a concerted effort to effectively eliminate the middle class and all of its subordinate classes. When's the last time a poor man screwed over a rich man? Vice versa? Every minute of every day. Corruption and greed inspire more corruption and greed until everybody plays along to get along, or gets run over. Hence, the current corporate climate that is the key to all "success" today.
Tom, Are you saying that poor people are better than rich people? Or that if the rich and poor are polar opposites, and the rich think only of themselves, then the poor think only of others? And where does that place the middle class (and "subordinate classes?" What are those?)? Are you saying the middle class is morally neutral? The problem with our political system today is not greed (that's an ethical issue that challenges every class and generation), or class war, but lack of trust. Too many, on both sides of the aisle, refuse to even consider the proposition that the other side is anything other than evil incarnate.