When is "Enough enough"

Sorry, I guess I was giving you to much credit...I thought you were capable of understanding that.

 

Ya know you wrote the thread saying it came to you while talking to a friend. I didnt get the memo that ''libs'' meant Tom and Moen. I just thought that ''libs'' to you meant a political party that you oppose.( I'll just assume the memo got lost). So when I asked you about it you couldve just said I was refering to past posts by other members. But you like to be vague. And then attempt to belittle someone who questions your posts. Why is it so hard to be civil?

 

Man, one really has to draw you a picture, huh?
Upon having the original conversation with my friend I was reminded of the comments made by Dr moen and his twin. This lead me to create the thread. There. Has the light come on yet? Get it? I don't think I can explain it on a baser level.

 

Man you dont give me any credit or courtesy. You start a new thread and we all are to know it had to do with past threads? I really dont read much of Toms posts. But I hope the digs you get in make you feel better.

 

Well, if you didn't know what you were talking about perhaps you shouldn't have badgered me, you think?
Don't start crying on us or anything.

 

You didnt say Moen and Tom in the start of the thread, did you? And I've read other posts by you where you call Democrats 'libs'.

 

I call libs libs and fools fools

 

You really are a very angry guy. Holy crap. Next time send them a private message when you want only Tom and Moen to comment.

 

Thats great. Great. Keep up the good work.

 

No, craiga, I'm not angry. I pity you, I am not angry at you.

 

See, there ya go again. I didnt say you were angry at me...Do I need to go slower....I just said you were an angry. Not angry at anyone. Just angry. Got it now? I didnt say you were angry at me. Understand? Do you need pictures with arrows?

 

"that statement". Care to spell out who said what? Or do you even know what you're referring to? (I'd bet the latter).

 

Hey Craig (aka Dude)

There are only like 5 regular posters on this entire pathetic forum. It wasn't hard to figure out who he was talking about. I guess the only requirement for understanding was to actually have a brain which explains why you didn't and probably still don't get it. As for my nastiness and impoliteness, it is a product of dealing with people like you. You just like being difficult for the sake of being difficult. You are a nitpicker and always have been. Remember your stupid spelling and grammar rants last year. Yep, I think you earned yourself a new dickname, nitpicker.

 

a "product" of...blah, blah, blah...

You mean like the "product" of my "hatred" for the right? For corporate rapists? Ahhhh. You mean...your "experiences" lead you to conclude certain things about certain groups, certain predictable behaviors of the certain predictable mentality that goes along with certain individuals. All based on your personal experiences (of which) you form a general opinion.
That what you mean by "product"?

 

NO!

It is real simple. Nitpicker gets on my nerves with this antics. Therefore I am not nice to him. No need to get all philosophical about it.

 

Nah. Your ill-mannered disposition was instilled in you long before I came into the picture. But it doesnt matter what I say. You said it yourself; you are just looking for another target. And that ''dickname''..pretty dull witted, but you slipped it under the radar. You must be beaming. And nitpicker aint so bad, its much more mild than the one I have for you.

 

Oh Come on! BTW its ''the statement'' not ''that statement'' Oh Christ, now we'll here from your compatriot in rudeness.

 

Oh, what happened. Did I make a spelling error. Ooops! My bad! And you would be wrong about my disposition. Ask everyone how happy I was when you were gone.