The Dems just voted...

Discussion in 'Politics' started by arizonaJack, Sep 23, 2009.

  1. craig a

    craig a New Member

    I looked through the archives from AP's hompage and could not find this story. Odd. And I just cant recall AP using the timeline ''three days ago''.
     
  2. arizonaJack

    arizonaJack Well-Known Member

    Are you serious? Your calling that a fake link?
     
  3. craig a

    craig a New Member

    I cannot find the story on AP's website. I looked between 9/20 to 9/25. I didnt say it was fake. I just found it odd. Should I look under the date ''three days ago''?
     
  4. arizonaJack

    arizonaJack Well-Known Member

    I just posted that link from Google News, they put the 3 day thing on there. I also heard it on the news and Cspan, thats how my post beat the AP's by a few hours........
     
  5. craig a

    craig a New Member

    I just cannot find this on C-span's website either. I searched from 9/20-9/24. There are alot of stories on the Senate finance commitee, but none regarding this vote. Can anyone please post a link to cspan that has this story? thanks.
     
  6. arizonaJack

    arizonaJack Well-Known Member

  7. craig a

    craig a New Member

    I appreciate the effort. Thanks. But how is it that you posted this story almost 24 hours before the Washington Examiner? And why would that newspaper give the story to an op-ed editor to cover? I'm not familiar with the W.E., so I dont know its policy, but you would think they would have a capitol hill reporter.
     
  8. arizonaJack

    arizonaJack Well-Known Member

    I knew because Greta Van Sustren said it live on air as the vote ended, before it hit the news papers and the wire. I am not positive, but think I also heard it on CSpan the next morning. When working in my office at night, I either have on talk radio or various news on TV
     
  9. De Orc

    De Orc Well-Known Member

    Take them to long to post on line!! What utter twaddle
     
  10. craig a

    craig a New Member

    Yea. Van Sustren. I watched her the other night. She said that 'under God' was always in the pledge of alligence. Very reliable.
     
  11. De Orc

    De Orc Well-Known Member

  12. arizonaJack

    arizonaJack Well-Known Member

    It will not at all matter to the cliffjumpers, they eyes and ears are glazed over with a cultlike adoration.

    Those who care will expect BO to hammer the clowns, as he said in several debates, NO EARMARKS.

    Lets see.

    Besides, your source made a mistake once, they are not very reliable;)
     
  13. De Orc

    De Orc Well-Known Member

    And of course yours are Jack, like those clips on President Obama's speach regarding detention of Terror suspects that you put up the other day!!
     
  14. arizonaJack

    arizonaJack Well-Known Member

    Did you not back me into a corner on that Steve? You just like to argue, period. when I'm wrong, I'll admit it. You know that.

    Stop the BS of calling me out like a sheeple when you know I am not, just to get a reaction. thats not moderating, thats institigating. You look really freakin ignorant when you do that. We both know you are not ignorant, why would you try so hard to appear so. I don't freaking get it.:mad:
     
  15. craig a

    craig a New Member

    Yea. Once. Only once. Funny. How many times must she be wrong to be unreliable? Ya know it seems strange, that the only sources you produced were a make shift story from AP. One that wasnt directly from them but rather ''copied''. Another from a conservative op-ed editor, that wasnt really a story, just snippets of sentences. And the word of Greta Van Sustern. It makes one wonder why no other newspapers covered this story. Makes me wonder anyway. Three rather dubious internet links and its taken as gospel. Oh yeah, I'm ready for you to tell me what a cliff jumper I am now.
     
  16. arizonaJack

    arizonaJack Well-Known Member

    Craig
    You dont like the news so you attack the source. I am thinking you just dont like me and always want to just plain dispute anything I saw. I shed a tear, I am really depressed. I so wish I could make you like me.:( I'm off for some Advil Pm because I am so upset I might not sleep tonight.

    Now, really. Those of you with no motive will find that those are perfectly legit links, and the facts are facts.
     
  17. De Orc

    De Orc Well-Known Member

    You called me Jack just check the series of posts or do you think I somehow magicaly made my comment before you but posted it after yours?
    You like dishing it out dont you but as soon as anyone dares to stand up to you OH NO thats wrong, thats Instigating. Just read your own words to Craig and I quote "You dont like the news so you attack the source." So dont call me Ignorant when the hat fits yourself.
    So stop your Instigating and I will stop showing you up
     
  18. tomcorona

    tomcorona Anti republican truther

    Jack,
    Cultlike adoration? Does sound like, I don't know....jealousy? Not trying to insult you Jack, just offering an honest view of that particular remark. After all, I suppose we all have our agendas.:)
     
  19. craig a

    craig a New Member

    Again with the 'attack the... whatever'... crap. Please that cliche is getting really worn. I didnt say you were wrong I didnt say I didnt like the news. I am just not sure of the reliablity of your sources. And anyone who thinks that post that gives a timeline of 'three days ago' and claims to be a AP story, yet no one can find that AP story from AP archives, is willing to belive anything they find on the net. Talk about cliffjumpers. And I'm still waiting for you to give me the amount of times Van Sustren can be wrong before she loses her credibilty.
     

Share This Page