I'm obviously not a fan of Sarah Palin but wonder if that photo wasn't doctored. If true, yes I'd be rather upset if it were my kid. Of course the kid's already been punished. Sarah and Todd are her parents.
My Mom would beat the s**t out of me. Then she'd tell my Dad and he'd take off his belt and I'd get it again. But then again I would never have done that with her around and at that age.
Yep, those darn blue collar, traditional nuclear family types! Sounding a little elitist there Clembo.
If McCain did this, he wouldn't be anywhere close in this election. Associate with a terrorist sympathizer (Ayers), who still says he wishes he had done more attacks.
Arent we all terrorist sympathizers? Wasnt this country was founded by terrorists? Of course we dont call them that. That term didnt apply back then. It didnt even apply in the 1960's. But its used now because it sounds scarier. I guess Al Capone was a terrorist. Oh, and who could forget that terrorist, John Wilkes Booth? Ayers broke the law no doubt about it. But thats called a criminal.
Why what is the difference between a Terrorist and a Freedom fighter other than the cause they serve and your point of view, the American colonists rebelled against the legal goverment of the colonies or do you dispute that? The Taliban was the legal goverment of Afghanistan till we overthrew them or do you disagree with that? The Cuban goverment is the legal goverment of Cuba but attempts were made to overthrow them, they took over in a revolution just as your country did. Todays terrorist can become tomorrows legitamate goverment quite easily.
De Orc, I see you are still just as ignorant as you were before you banned me for disagreeing with you.
No I baned you for using abusive language and personal insults to members of this forum, and I also see you still have not changed, so you want to rewrite history as well LOL big suprise there. As for been ignorant tell me exactly what is ignorant about my post? I am simply stating the truth try reading your history.
Ban yourself, bc you spew abusive language every time you post. Your latest, calling me a terrorist! And a personal insult to add.
I don't think there is a 100% definition of 'Terrorism' and I think it is used rather loosely at times. In general, I also think of terrorism as mostly being willful acts of violence against non-combatants and non-military targets. Rebellion and Terrorism are not synonymous.
Were exactly did I call you a terrorist? were you actualy around during the revolution LOL whats a matter cant you take someone disagreeing with you without resorting to childish behaviour? Very true Stu but how many armed rebellions can you name were civilians never got hurt?
When you say we, that usually means all people involved in this conversation. A terrorist sympathizer is a terrorist btw. You don't have to be involved in an attack to be considered a terrorist. Read this... Salim Hamdan, the former driver for terrorist mastermind Osama bin Laden, was found guilty of supporting terrorism on Wednesday by a jury of six military officers. Childish posts require childish responses. Just trying to speak to your level of intelligence.
Well as I never said that again were did I call you a terrorist LOL Ah yes I see what you are getting at Stu and I quite agree unfortunatly that happens too seldom, in most cases the families of those who work for a regiem are targeted as is the infrastructure of a country, ie the transport and comunication links etc and here again civilian casualties do happen. Look at the Contras and Sandinistas both sides were happily killing regardless of who got hurt but when the Sandinistas assumed power after been called terrorists the Contras were called Freedom fighters. It depends on which side of the divide you are.