It Has Begun

Discussion in 'Politics' started by CoinOKC, Jan 22, 2025.

  1. justafarmer

    justafarmer Well-Known Member

    And a plethora of documented nay votes on opening the gov't up. Backed-up by miles of film with people admitting to viewing and using their constituents as nothing more than leverage.
     
    CoinOKC and toughcoins like this.
  2. Profiler
    Inspired

    Profiler Well-Known Member

    This is an altered document. I haven’t had time to look at the others you posted but I will when I get a chance.
    Just ask yourself why was the doc altered? Another question, why would you take the words of an individual (that had previously been convicted and under investigation) addressed to another that aided and abetted in the crimes? Ultimately convicted also.
     
    Mopar Dude likes this.
  3. GeneWright

    GeneWright Well-Known Member

    Yes, I am aware of how propaganda works. I never accepted the implication of the propaganda though (that Trump was abusing the victim). Merely that he had close proximity to them and was aware of what was happening with Epstein. At least from this document. Others make more explicit claims.

    Why would they lie about Trump? In private emails. In 2011, well before he was on the political radar in any serious sense.
     
  4. What U ignore

    What U ignore Thread KILLER

    The cognitive dissonance in this forum COMES FROM IGNORANT POSTERS who refuse to answer direct questions that would prove their ignorance. Your handlers should be proud.
     
  5. Profiler
    Inspired

    Profiler Well-Known Member

    So you are admitting that this document was altered and you didn’t fall for it? Just asking so we are on the same page.
     
  6. GeneWright

    GeneWright Well-Known Member

    Just checking, are you referring to the redaction when you say alteration?
     
  7. Mopar Dude

    Mopar Dude Well-Known Member

    Look at this logically. As much effort as the previous administration put into trying to have Trump incarcerated, do you really believe they would have held this information and not acted on it? This is starting to smell a whole lot like Russiagate.
     
  8. toughcoins

    toughcoins Rarely is the liberal viewpoint tainted by realism


    Held? . . . It takes time to make things look convincing.

    .
     
    Mopar Dude likes this.
  9. Profiler
    Inspired

    Profiler Well-Known Member

    That’s not a redaction. The document has been altered with intent to deceive.
     
  10. CoinOKC
    Fiendish

    CoinOKC T R U M P

    I don’t see why anyone would make a big deal of those e-mails. They show ABSOLUTELY NOTHING incriminating against President Trump.

    Wishful thinking @GeneWright?
     
  11. GeneWright

    GeneWright Well-Known Member

    Then yes, we're on the same page
     
  12. GeneWright

    GeneWright Well-Known Member

    They only just got these documents this year after Epstein's estate was subpoenaed.

    https://edition.cnn.com/2025/08/25/politics/epstein-estate-subpoena-oversight-committee

    They had until September 8th to turn everything over to the committee
     
  13. Profiler
    Inspired

    Profiler Well-Known Member

    These exact documents have been in the possession of federal authorities for years. They just haven’t been turned over to the Committee. Why didn’t the Biden regime release them????
     
  14. GeneWright

    GeneWright Well-Known Member

    I don't know what to say to that other than you're wrong. They're all part of the subpoena that had the estate produce these documents on Sept 8 2025

    https://oversight.house.gov/wp-cont...5-Subpoena-and-Schedule-to-Epstein-Estate.pdf
     
  15. Profiler
    Inspired

    Profiler Well-Known Member

    Really? Are you telling me that the FBI is so incompetent that they can’t find emails??? Just because these haven’t been released previously doesn’t mean they aren’t in the government’s possession.
     
  16. GeneWright

    GeneWright Well-Known Member

    What makes you think they were in their possession? Like, show me the logical path you follow without assumptions. My path is, the subpoena this year is for the information that's currently being released. So... unless you're saying there's some secret subpoena from years ago that the FBI has and just "trust me bro, it's real" I'm not following.

    And yes, I do actually think they're incompetent.
     
  17. toughcoins

    toughcoins Rarely is the liberal viewpoint tainted by realism

    It is ignorant to assume that, simply because the House Committee has requested information, another government body or agency is not already in possession of same.
     
  18. GeneWright

    GeneWright Well-Known Member

    Okay, but that requires an assumption and logical leap. They may have had it, they may have not. We could make many fantastical and conspiratorial claims if we accept your logic.
     
  19. toughcoins

    toughcoins Rarely is the liberal viewpoint tainted by realism

    Who leapt first? :oops:
     
    Profiler likes this.
  20. Profiler
    Inspired

    Profiler Well-Known Member

    The intelligence community, on a whole is less incompetent than other government agencies. It has been proven that partisan and corrupt actors have been running the place… Comey Strzok, McCabe et al.
    He’s a short list of items the government took into their possession long prior to the House subpoena(s):
    https://www.justice.gov/ag/media/1391271/dl?inline
    Note the amount of digital hardware. SOP would dictate that thorough examinations of held data, recovery of deleted files, and Subpoenas of emails, email addresses and other communications sites not readily accessible.
    Now who’s making assumptions… Bro?
     

Share This Page