Sure, I’ll admit that President Trump has a tremendous following. But so did Obama, albeit for all the wrong reasons. The lemmings who followed Obama were mostly brainless dolts who couldn’t look past his race.
You realize that Obama bombed Libya, right? If so, you must also realize that his followers remained as silent as a church mouse when he did so. There were no serious calls to impeach him, no clamoring to change the War Powers Act or to put him in stocks in the town square. Yet when Trump saves the world, liberals immediately want him gone. Have you ever considered that maybe it’s YOU and your ideology that are wrong? Being raised in an ultra-liberal household and being taught by ultra-liberal professors have brainwashed you. Stop being the enemy within, dude. There’s a very real world beyond the liberal pablum you’ve been fed all your life.
lol and without an ounce of irony, in the same post you say I'm the brainwashed one. Have you ever even left the states? Many don’t, no shame in it. Trust me though, I'm aware there's a whole world out there.
Many times. I feel like kissing the ground every time I return. No matter what the Lefties are trying to do to it, the United States is still the greatest country on earth and I can’t imagine living permanently anywhere else.
And trust me that most of that world does not want or need you. I know....17 different countries of "I know".
I don't think we'll see much difference in Iran's tactics until the War Powers Resolution becomes clearer.
I’ll bet. I am flying in to the city next week. Looking forward to experiencing the local excitement.
He's not too vain to have a successor . . . he wants to know how worthy that successor will be before making the commitment . . . Obama on the other hand . . . well, history tells that story.
The thick-headed, dogmatic Ayatollah is lashing out like a wounded animal. He realizes his totalitarian regime is coming to an end… and he’s scared. Now is a great time for the Iranian people to rise up, overthrow this monster and install a democratic (Republic?) government.
YES! Supreme Court allows Trump's third-country deportations, in major test for president The Supreme Court has been asked to preside over a flurry of lower court challenges centered on Trump’s immigration crackdown. June 23, 2025 The Supreme Court on Monday granted the Trump administration's request to stay a lower court injunction blocking them from deporting individuals to third countries without prior notice— a near-term win for the Trump administration as it looks to quickly enforce its immigration crackdown. Justices on the high court ruled 6-3 to stay the lower court injunction, with Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissenting. "Rather than allowing our lower court colleagues to manage this high-stakes litigation with the care and attention it plainly requires, this Court now intervenes to grant the Government emergency relief from an order it has repeatedly defied," Justice Sotomayor said. "I cannot join so gross an abuse of the Court’s equitable discretion," she added. At issue was a group of migrants challenging their removals to third countries, or countries that were not their country of origin. Lawyers for those migrants had urged the Supreme Court earlier this month to leave in place a ruling from U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy, who previously ordered the Trump administration to keep in U.S. custody all migrants slated for deportation to a country not "explicitly" named in their removal orders – known as a third-country deportation. Murphy, a federal judge in Boston, presided over a class-action lawsuit from migrants who are challenging deportations to third countries, including South Sudan, El Salvador and other countries, including Costa Rica, Guatemala and others that the administration has reportedly eyed in its ongoing wave of deportations. Murphy ruled that migrants must remain in U.S. custody until they can have the opportunity to conduct a "reasonable fear interview," or the chance to explain to U.S. officials any fear of persecution or torture should they be released into the country. Murphy stressed his order does not bar Trump "from executing removal orders to third countries." Instead, he emphasized in an earlier order, "it simply requires" the government "to comply with the law when carrying" out such removals under the U.S. Constitution and the Trump administration's wave of eleventh-hour removals and deportations. In appealing the case to the Supreme Court, U.S. Solicitor General D. John Sauer argued that Judge Murphy's ruling had blocked them from removing "some of the worst of the worst illegal aliens," including a class of migrants sent to South Sudan earlier this year without due process or notice. He reiterated in a separate order that the migrants remain in U.S. custody at a military base in Djibouti until each of them could be given a "reasonable fear interview," or a chance to explain to U.S. officials any fear of persecution or torture, should they be released into South Sudanese custody. The Supreme Court update comes after a flurry of lower court challenges aimed at blocking Trump’s immigration crackdown in his second White House term. U.S. judges have repeatedly ruled that the Trump administration has violated due process by failing to notify the migrants of their imminent removals, or afford them any opportunity to challenge their deportations in court – a view reiterated, albeit narrowly, by the Supreme Court four separate times since Trump took office. White House officials, meanwhile, have blasted so-called "activist" judges as attempting to enact a political agenda, and have repeatedly rejected the notion that illegal immigrants are not entitled to due process. As many as a dozen people from several countries, including Vietnam and Myanmar, were allegedly ordered deported to South Sudan— which lawyers for the immigrants previously argued was in "clear violation" of Judge Murphy's order. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/su...-third-country-deportations-south-sudan-other
I thought about this statement a lot today. And fact is, yes that is probably true. For those of us that believe in our government we do like to accept that they are armed with the information they need to make the best possible decision to keep my family safe..... Whether you paid attention or not I did my level best to support Biden up until he proved his incompetence in Afghanistan...... You see, it doesn't matter if the human being resides in white, brown or orange skin. It doesn't make a hill of beans if they are consumed with ego as most politicians are. They are all imperfect humans. It doesn't matter if they call themselves conservative, liberal or martian. What matters is that they make solid decisions that are best for Americans whether they be left, right or otherwise and not catering to a voting base..... Yeah, I will support the man because I been around the block enough to know that if he fails, we all fail.