Your party is headed by a man guilty of sexual abuse of a woman he met on the street

And that isn't even a deal breaker for your ilk. Says way more about you than it says about some privileged pervert.

 

Joe, IMO you are a worthless poster. This is why:

A normal, person of good moral character (that can be anyone and has nothing to do with politics) can look at a situation and make an informed, true comment to express their personal opinion based on the information they receive.

For example, you have done so with your OP. What you posted (Trump was found guilty of sexual abuse) is true and based on a court trial. Therefore, any normal knowledgeable person following the news from several services knows that is the truth. How they view Trump may change or not BUT HE WAS FOUND GUILTY OF SEXUAL ABUSE. Guilty or not, he was judged to be guilty so any NORMAL, unbiased, informed, person of good moral character can agree with that statement and therefore is a valuable member here.

In my professional opinion, you lack the privilege to even post on a political forum because you have shown yourself to be ignorant, biased, disrespectful, cowardly to engage and answer direct questions, a liar (either by ignorance or willful), and someone who hates America. You refuse to admit the truth when confronted by it. I consider what you do to this forum and on it is cowardly monkey business.

I shall pray for you Joe.
________________________________________________________________________
Liars lie and the ignorant are duped into being their pawns.

 

“Your party”? What party would that be? The Democrat Party? Yes, Bill Clinton is certainly a leader of the Democrat Party. Your point?

 

Nice try but rape is just a little more serious in the eyes of the law than a consensual affair.

You try and try to deny your leader is a convicted sex offender but we see you.

How sad you have to be to support this vicious pervert. And don't forget about the 26 other women that made the same claim as well as the pervert himself admitting that he can grab women be the puzzy anytime he wants because he is famous.
You're all a bunch of sad perverts. Not an accusation, a proven fact.

 

Are you talking about the rape accusation by Juanita Broaddrick against Bill Clinton?

That doesn’t sound like a consensual affair to me.

 

Accusation?

 

Oh, I don’t know . . . I think that all depends on what the meaning of “isn’t” isn’t.

 

Oh. The stupid us strong in the MAGA crowd.

 

COME ON, Let's all put this ignorant liar on ignore for good. Do you realize how much of your life is waisted on the old fool?

LINGORANT IAR OF THE HOUR POST: "JoeNation, posted: "]Nice try but rape is just a little more serious in the eyes of the law than a consensual affair."

This is true. However, while charged with "rape" it could not be proved so they charged him with abuse on the word of the lady. Dual Justice at work as Biden's rape of a woman (remember this senile old hair sniffer took showers with his daughter) was ignored.] "You try and try to deny your leader is a convicted sex offender but we see you. "

"How sad you have to be to support this vicious pervert. And don't forget about the 26 other women that made the same claim as well as the pervert himself admitting that he can grab women be the puzzy anytime he wants because he is famous.
You're all a bunch of sad perverts. Not an accusation, a proven fact."

The only proven fact here is that you are an ignorant liar who is worthless to post with.
______________________________________________________________________
Liars lie, Communists lie, democrats lie, atheists lie, and they all get away with it.

 

@JoeNation,

How many states make up the USA?

How many ignorant old cowards fit into a discussion?

 

Title of thread . . . "Your party is headed by a man guilty of sexual abuse of a woman he met on the street"

These words emanating from someone who probably can't well-define what a man or a woman is . . .

 

@JoeNation cannot define an "oath" either.

 

Yep. Hillary said that women need to be believed. Who knows if she can define what a woman is, though.

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juanita_Broaddrick
How about another?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paula_Jones

Let’s look at the leftist narrative on Joey’s accusers:https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Biden_sexual_assault_allegation

Humm. Durham Report tells us all that anyone with a couple of marbles rolling around what they need to know.

 

First of all you are conflating a civil verdict, where the standard is preponderance with a criminal conviction where the burden is beyond a reasonable doubt. And overlooking in the civil matter the rape claim did not succeed.

 

You made the best point of all. I should have realized that is a better answer than mine. Let's hope the lonely old retired plumber understands what you wrote.

 

I suspect he understands and knew it before he posted. He just couldn't let such a good opportunity to mislead go to waste.

 

I Think he is too ignorant to think that out.

 

I decided that if this crowd can overlook assaulting a woman by pinning her against a wall in a department store and sticking his finger forcibly up her vagina, overlooking the legal definitions wasn't the real problem here, if you catch my drift.

Just keep supporting this openly unapologetic serial sexual preditor. You make my glossing over legal definitions seem harmless by comparison.

BOOM!!!!

 

Actually, I got exactly the defenses of the indefensible I anticipated. As far as letting "such a good opportunity" to mislead goes, sexual abuse of an innocent women shouldn't be your definition of a good opportunity in the first place but here we are. Let's white wash the real problem here. Your party leadership.