Al Qaida exists where US intelligence dominates. Al Qaida in US when Bush need excuse to activate Mid-east war. That is 911 attack. Al Qaida is everywhere in Iraq now to bomb innocent civilians when US occupies Iraq. Strange to say, under the Saddam regime, there is no Al Qaida. Al Qaida seems only exist where the regime being controlled by US. So we see no Al qaida in Syria and Iran. But they appears to attack ordinary people when the government either is controlled by US intelligence or supported by US intelligence. That's why you see Al Qaida attacks in US, in Afghanistan, in Pakistan, in Iraq (after it is occupied by US). Because where they are protected by the intelligence, worked as a whip to beat people. When government want money and power, they beat the people with this whip (Al Qaida terror attack) People feel hurt then give up their civil rights and money to the government.
1. To your theory, Al Qaida is not a threat to other countries regime? Besides, how do you explain the accusation of Bush regime that Saddam had link with Al Qaida and support their terror activities? 2. That's a good point. Yes, Al Qaida exiested in Afghanistan when the Taliban was in control. It doesn't conflict to my theory: Al Qaida is a tool of US intelligence. Bin Laden was under Taliban's shelter. So Taliban and Al Qaida all work for the US interest. Why US has a war on Taliban - its own proxy? Because they accuse 911 attack is done by Al Qaida. So they had to invade Afghan before they invading Iraq. The truth is, the so said mastermind of 911 attack, Bin laden, is never captured, as long as the Taliban leader - Omar. But Saddam, who has no link to 911 attack, and even no WMD is found in Iraq, was captured and hanged. Is that clear? Further more, US never seriously treat Taliban as a big enemy. It lets Nato to handle in Afghanistan while to put the main US force in Iraq despite Bin Laden is still at large. Is that clear? Then why did they start the Afghan war? Because the 911 case framed Al Qaida as perpetrator. US had to invade Afghanistan first before invading Iraq. This government is evil. It even kills its own citizens (false flag attack 911) to justify a war it wanted. So what for the deaths of Afghanistan? This is why Bin Laden is still alive and even can issue tape from time to time to the demand of US regime but Saddam, with no evidence linked to 911, was captured and hanged.
How do you think we keep it secret? Everybody knows about the conspiracy so there's nobody to leak it to, so viola!, the secret is kept.
What Al Qaida has done? 1. When neocon wanted mid-east war, they activated a false flag attack - 911 in the name of Al Qaida. The victim is American people. 2. When Pentagon want to stay in Iraq and ask for more budget, Al Qaida bombed the market and mosque to kill Iraqi civilians, gave Pentagon an excuse to stay. (and even with more troops there). The victim is Iraqi civilians. 3. When Americans are tired of Iraq war and civilian casulty, Al Qaida mystically weakened and the death of US troops and civilian both dropped to the bottom. It helps Republican to avoid a big issue which would embarass them very much in the election year. Once again, Al Qaida helps Bush's party. How conveniently Bush regime plays this "terrorist" whip - Al Qaida against American people.
Top Ranking CIA Operatives Admit Al-qaeda Is a Complete Fabrication 3/8/2008 'In the BBC’s killer documentary called The Power of Nightmares, top CIA officials openly admit, Al-Qaeda is a total and complete fabrication, never having existed at any time. The Bush administration needed a reason that complied with the Laws so they could go after “the bad guy of their choice” namely laws that had been set in place to protect us from mobs and “criminal organizations” such as the Mafia. They paid Jamal al Fadl, hundred’s of thousands of dollars to back the U.S. Governments story of Al-qaeda a “group” or criminal organization they could “legally” go after.' Watch video here: http://polidics.com/cia/top-ranking-cia-operatives-admit-al-qaeda-is-a-complete-fabrication.html
As a matter of fact, Al Qaida was known only after 911 attack. Many didn't hear it before then. Even for Syria president Assadt. Quote, "A norwegian professor believes al-Qaida is a Pentagon-fiction: http://www.aftenposten.no/nyheter/uriks/article.jhtml?articleID=396241 Al Qaida exists where US intelligence dominate. Al Qaida in US when Bush need excuse to activate Mid-east war. That is 911 attack. Al Qaida is everywhere in Iraq now to bomb innocent civilians when US occupies Iraq. Strange to say, under the Saddam regime, there is no Al Qaida. Al Qaida seems only exist where the regime being controlled by US. So we see no Al qaida in Syria and Iran. No wonder Assad doubt it: Syrias president questions the existence of al-Qaida: May 26, 2003 «Syria Denies Existence of Al Qaeda» «KUWAIT CITY (Talon News) -- Syrian President Bashar Assad revealed in a newspaper interview on Sunday that he does not believe there is a terrorist group called al Qaeda, the organization widely believed to be the perpetrators of the hijackings on September 11, 2001 as well as the recent attacks in Saudi Arabia and Morocco.» «"Is there really an entity called al Qaeda? It was in Afghanistan, but is it there anymore?" Assad asked.» «Assad speculated about the existence of al Qaeda and its notorious leader Usama bin Laden in a Kuwaiti newspaper called Al-Anba. » «Nevertheless, questioning the existence of the al Qaeda terrorist network is very popular in Arab countries. Many people in these countries believe that the United States has hyperbolized the danger of al Qaeda as a means for portraying Muslims as violent and dangerous.» http://www.gopusa.com/news/2003/may/0526_assad_denial.shtml
Christianity is a wonderful religion, turn the other cheek..do unto others...etc...yes it has been misused in the past but the religion is one of peace. Islam is a religion started by a murdering raider and rapist and only offers peace to those who follow its chapters of terror. Before their was a united states the sword of blood killed millions what clever way to kill and win public view then to blame those who you kill and those who want to defend themselves against the false god followers of islam.
Christianity is a wonderful religion, turn the other cheek..do unto others...etc...yes it has been misused in the past but the religion is one of peace. Islam is a religion started by a murdering raider and rapist and only offers peace to those who follow its chapters of terror. Before their was a united states the sword of blood killed millions what clever way to kill and win public view then to blame those who you kill and those who want to defend themselves against the false god followers of islam.
Please correct me if I made any mistake on the following: Christian country US has its army in an Islamic country Iraq with no justification, (or wrong excuse WMD). Caused nearly one million loss of civilian's lives and 4 million refugee. Intrude into others homeland and made a mess over there, you boast its a peaceful religion. May be in your dictionary, shamless means honourable? ---------------- Al Qaida, from begining, is a tool of CIA. At first, it was used as mujaheddin to deal with Soviet Union. Then, it was used to deal with American people (911) to justify war in Mid-east. And now, it is used to provoke the conflict between Iraqis (Sunni and Shiite). Even Sunni Muslim realized Al Qaida is their enemy, how couldn't you? Quote, "Young Pakistanis: Bin Laden Is A CIA Creation Steve Watson Tuesday, Dec 4, 2007 An ABC news piece that ran yesterday morning attracted attention after four Pakistanis who were being interviewed about the attitudes and life of young people in Pakistan declared Osama Bin Laden to be a creation of western intelligence and stressed that Islamic extremist attitudes towards the west were virtually non existent in their country before 9/11. ABC have since pulled the video footage from their website, but an industrious prisonplanet forum member grabbed the footage and uploaded it to youtube. Video-- <http://infowars.net/articles/december2007/041207Laden.htm>
The middle east was once filled with christians but the muslims killed and continue to kill not only there but everywhere. Why, because islam is false so the truth must be killed so the false seems real. Not only with people but with events as well.
So you can't correct my description on Iraq war which conflicts your opinion. Here I can correct what you said in above comment: The America (Both north and south) was once filled with Indians but the Christian eliminated most of them. And now the main language are English and Spanish. Don't blame others, watch your own history first. -------------- Al Qaida and real Islam resistence are treated differently. The real Islam resistence are put to Quantanamo where they are tortured. Like Zhubadah was waterboarded. But he is not Al Qaida. The hired tool such like Moussaoui, Bin Laden, Al Zarqawi all played a strong role to show that Al Qaida is cruel, inhuman. They aimed at common people, either its Americans or Iraqis. What they have done is to justify Bush's war policy. Any benefit to Islam? None. So Bin Laden can never been eliminated. From time to time he issued a tape when Bush needs it. A false flag that helps a lot to neocon but did nothing good to Muslim. That is Al Qaida. That's why Moussaoui cried in court, "I'm Al Qaida." Because Feds need someone to prove 911 was done by Islamic extremist not government insiders. Zubaydah, the man CIA used to justify the waterboarding that he confessed in 35 seconds after waterboarding, has a story here. Zubaydah Denies al-Qaida Link WASHINGTON (AP) - Abu Zubaydah, accused of being a senior al-Qaida operative, says he has been a U.S enemy since childhood but isn't a member of the terrorist group or an associate of Osama bin Laden. Zubaydah also told a military hearing in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, that he had been tortured in U.S. custody and confessed to things he did not do, according to a Pentagon transcript released Monday. Zubaydah said that from 1994 to about 2000 he was a facilitator at guest houses in Pakistan, where he helped Muslims get to Afghanistan's Khalden training camp for "defensive jihad'' - that is to fight against forces that invade Muslim lands anywhere. He then helped send the trained militants on to Bosnia, Chechnya and elsewhere, he said. "The statement that I was an associate of Osama bin Laden is false,'' Zubaydah is quoted as saying by the transcript of his March 27 hearing. "I'm not his partner and I'm not a member of al-Qaida.'' http://www.libertyforum.org/showfla...view=collapsed&sb=6&o=21&part=1#Post295965365
Al Qaida mission in Iraq - to provoke the conflict between Sunni and Shiite.(10/2/07) Al Qaida (bear the mission to work for US intelligence) bombed Cole and US embassies in Africa, tried to give US a war excuss in Mid-east. It failed in Clinton's regime. Clinton only approved a missle bombing in Afghanistan. He knew war is an important issue not a toy, couldn't play it too easy. He was punished by Lewinsky scandal and almost be impeached from his seat. So the inside group changed another president, Bush, who is eagerly to follow up the order of the Inside Group. Al Qaida, once again, attacked on 911. (though I believe the attack was done by the insiders, Al Qaida only took over the responsibility in the name.) Bush started the war in Mid-east, (Afghanistan and Iraq). Al Qaida's mission (to cause a war) was done. What is Al Qaida's next mission? You know the Road map in Mid-east for the Inside Group is more war. (Iran and Syria) So US troops must stay there until more conquer is done. A peaceful Iraq surely won't justify the occupation of Iraq by US Army. That's why we saw Al Qaida once again take up its second mission - to make a mess in Iraq. Al Qaida bombed Shiite's shirine in Samarra. Its' suicide bomber killed a lot of innocent Iraqi civillians, dozens to hundred died in each bombing. How could Islam shirine and Muslim became the targets of Al Qaida? It doesn't make sense at all. But watch from the side of US intelligence, you know what is it. They tried to provoke a civil war in Iraq so US troops has an excuse to stay, even to increase the troops there. The recent situation is a good sample. Bush planned Iran war in early September. The troops he needed for war has been sent to Iraq in June in the name of "surge". The excuse for Iran war is another super 911- a nuclear attack in US on 8/30. That was when a US B-52 "mistakenly carried 6 nuclear missle" flied over states on 8/30. The plot went soured. And Bush pushes out a General to conclude "surge" is necessary in September. What is Al Qaida's mission, you still are not clear?
So tell me this then if the Bush administration and this Inside group had all the pieces in place why did they not just steamroller Iran? And lets be honest here the US goverment did not have to provoke any Civil war in Iraq it was allready there, the only think that kept the lid on it was Saddam and his execution squads. He was allready fighting a war against the Kurds, had killed many of his own people in mass gas attacks!! Or did you somehow miss those bits?
US invasion on Iraq caused at least 600,000 loss of civilians lives, (some report says more than one million) and 4 million refugees. Saddam could never match it. It's funny a war criminal accuses another dictator of killing people. As for death squad, Quote, "From Afghanistan to Africa The Return of U. S. Death Squads By CONN HALLINAN United Nations officials charge that secret “international intelligence services” are conducting raids to kill Afghan civilians, then hiding the perpetuators behind an “impenetrable” wall of bureaucracy. Philip Alston of the UN Human Rights Council said that “heavily armed internationals” leading local militias have killed scores of Afghan civilians. Coalition forces have killed more than 200 Afghan civilians since January. He called the raids, which operate independent of the US and NATO military commands, “unacceptable.” Alston pointed to a specific incident last January in which two brothers were killed during a raid in the southern city of Kandahar, an area where the Taliban have a strong presence. “The [two] victims are widely acknowledged, even by well informed government officials, to have no connection to the Taliban, and the circumstance of their deaths is suspicious,” he said. When Alston tried to investigate the murders, however, he hit a stonewall. “Not only was I unable to get any international military commander to provide their version of what took place, but I was unable to get any military commander to even admit that their soldiers were involved,” the UN official told the Financial Times. Suspicion has fallen on the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), which led such teams into Afghanistan during the 1990s in an attempt to capture or kill Osama bin Ladin, and again during the 2001 invasion. According to Alston, the shadow units work out of two bases: U.S. Camp Ghecko near Kandahar, and a base in the province of Nangarhar. “It is absolutely unacceptable for heavily armed internationals, accompanied by heavily armed Afghan forces, to be wondering around conducting dangerous raids that too often result in killings without anyone taking responsibility for them,” he wrote in a recent UN report. Something very similar may be going on in Iraq. In his latest book, “The War Within <http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1416558977/counterpunchmaga>,” Bob Woodward writes that the U.S. military has a program to “locate, target and kill key individuals in extremist groups.” Last month U.S. Special Forces killed the son and nephew of the governor of Salahuddin Province north of Baghdad. Unlike the shootings at roadblocks by U.S. troops, a common occurrence, Iraqi investigators say the two men were essentially executed. The question is: are Special Forces in Iraq and CIA units in Afghanistan carrying out clandestine hits? In most places in the world, those groups are called “death squads.” http://www.counterpunch.org/hallinan09102008.html
US invasion on Iraq caused at least 600,000 loss of civilians lives, (some report says more than one million) and 4 million refugees. That's it. Well I think if we had a democratic administration in office the death count would be much larger. The dems can do everything better then the republicans. Yes they can.