Hey Reich wing culture warriors, what do you have against Trans people?

I just can't figure out this latest hatred. What possible difference could it make to anyone that isn't Trans? Is this just more religious dogma on your part? Please explain this latest hatred to me.

At CPAC, A Call For Trans People To Be 'Eradicated' Gets Big Cheers
The conservative movement’s annual confab was creepily obsessed with trans kids and showcased the GOP’s alarming and intensifying anti-trans rhetoric.
ByChristopher Mathias
Mar 4, 2023, 02:56 PM EST|Updated an hour ago

NATIONAL HARBOR, Md. — Thousands of conservatives, including prominent Republican lawmakers and presidential hopefuls, flocked to a suburban Washington, D.C., convention center this week to discuss children’s genitals.

They were there for the 2023 Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), the preeminent annual gathering of America’s conservative movement, where speaker after speaker held forth on the urgent need for the Republican Party — an institution ostensibly dedicated to limited government — to criminalize the act of doctors and parents providing minors with gender-affirming care.

At CPAC, A Call For Trans People To Be 'Eradicated' Gets Big Cheers
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/cpac...er-michael-knowles_n_64038d23e4b0c78bb7430b1c

 

I don’t believe anyone really cares that people want to be trans. Honestly, if you’re not trans yourself, Theodore, why do you care?

Otherwise, the problem starts when anyone (straights, gays, trans or whoever) want to introduce pornography and other inappropriate material into schools.

It seems that a lot of this porn and other crap is being introduced by trans, gays, liberals, etc. No thanks.

 

I care because I don't want to see people "eliminated".

And you're confused. You should either look up the definition of pornography or explain to us how being gay, trans, or any other non-heterosexual orientation is pornagraphy.

Eliminated??? You people are way sicker than any trans kid.

This is straight up Nazi eugenics crap.

 

So, you’ve asked previously why I care about the people of Chicago when I don’t live in Chicago.

Yet, I ask why you care about trans people when you’re not trans and you act like your opinion actually matters. Should your opinion matter?

Don’t you realize how naive and pathetic you sound?

As far as trans people introducing children to pornography, yes, it happens. Pick any news site and you’ll find articles about it. You’ll find articles about them not only introducing pornography to children, but encouraging them to change their gender without their parents’ consent. This is sick stuff, but it’s absolutely happening and is being pushed by the liberals.

Wake up, man before this garbage infiltrates every aspect of our society. Or…. is that what you want to happen? I suspect it is.

 

Your fears ring hollow in context. I suggest you read some of this twitter thread with "examples of how modern transphobia recycles homophobia from years past"

Some key ones that apply to your post above:

'There is the "lavender Martian myth," that gay people are avaricious, rapacious, not quite human. The "lavender plague myth" seems to hold that homosexualism is a disease, a sickness, a contagion and that young people are particularly susceptible.'


Influence in the school






Many of those homophobic points were also just recycled from interracial panic, and those recycled from anti-segregationists, and so forth ad nauseum.

There was huge backlash and homophobia even in my lifetime, we moved past it, as we will with transphobia.

 

Can you show me anywhere else in nature that this phenomenon occurs? If not then I would suggest to you that probably 75% of what we see happening with young people is influenced rather than naturally occurring and will negatively affect their adult lives much like being influenced by the local drug pusher.

 

That's a complicated question. Since we can't speak to animals, we have to frame it around gender roles, which are fluid and changing even in human cultures. To answer this for animals, you'd have to first understand what a typical gender role is for them and then what a subversion of that might look like.

It also wouldn't apply to the vast majority of animals because it requires a social and cultural element to exist. On that front, suffice it to say that there's plenty of things humans do that don't have explicit counterparts in other animals. That doesn't make it wrong or unnatural. No other animals have organized religion, or to our knowledge any belief in a god. That doesn't make it wrong or unnatural to be religious.

If you really needed an answer, I'm sure there's case examples of animals breaking gender norms such as a father animal becoming a primary caretaker in a species that typically only females do that, or a male lion that hunts for the family more than the lioness.

 

Complicated? Any moreso than the possibility that all of this gender confusion is rooted, not in naturally developing the wrong gentilia, but in social insecurities followed by the proddings of an escapist class of individuals, followed again by deviant surgeons? Complicated? . . . I think not!

Mother Nature makes things simple . . . mankind makes them complicated.

These kids should not be shown the transgender door while school age . . . period.

 

If only that were true

I direct you back to post #5 in this thread

 

Sorry that you disagree, but it is true.

Try thinking a little bigger, Gene. Mankind has yet to improve upon the elegant simplicity of Mother Nature's sustainable model. To spend time on that pursuit is almost certainly a waste of time. All of our "innovations" help us swim upstream in pursuit of comfort and ease for us, but come at the expense of her sustainable model.

This thread is about transgenderism. Post #5 has absolutely nothing to do with the the efficacy of planting ideas of gender reassignment in the minds of those who cannot comprehend the permanence of such changes.

 

Yeah, that's true if you ignore the obvious parallels between modern transphobia and more classical bigotry.

 

Changing the sex one prefers for a partner and changing one's own body parts are completely different paradigms . . . you know better than to resort to that argument!

 

Except that it's a strawman argument to say that children are getting fever reassignment surgery, so we're pretty much back to the right wanting to police thought. The surgery is exceedingly rare, and not recommended for anyone under 18.

 

Don't be disingenuous. They're being lined up one after the next on the runway for takeoff.

Recommended or not, the idea is being implanted . . . and should not be.

 

Your complaint was that children were getting irreversible surgeries. That's simply not the case.

 

They're being prepped with hormones and puberty blockers and the movement is clearly afoot to do exactly what you say is not.

 

Yes, but those are reversible, and (as is mentioned in your article) are recommended because they help prevent suicide and improve mental health. It seems the goalposts of this thread keep moving.

 

Where exactly did I state that kids are having the surgery?

I have said they're being prepped for it, yes. That's the first step in the process. Get them to commit. Get them on the drugs. Get them in the operating room. Presto . . . it's too late to stop now.

It seems that liberals are giving up too easily on helping these kids work through their normal insecurities in favor of pushing the bounds of sexual experimentation.

 

To your credit you are correct. You're merely trying to police their thoughts. Famously, if you want a kid to not think about something, it works really well to ban it and make it secretive by hiding it from them.

So, you do agree that children are not getting the surgeries correct? Let's get it straight that you're just now concerned about their thoughts and with the healthcare practices of adults.

 

Sort of like omitting / changing certain words / phrases from children's books? Or omitting certain historical figures from textbooks or history lessons?

I'm concerned with not putting before children those options they are ill-prepared to consider.