RELEASE THE AFFIDAVIT!!!

RELEASE THE -edited- AFFIDAVIT! We will see for ourselves!!!!

 

But yes, if you were in on the current crime which is what we're talking about here DUMBAZZZZ!

 

Did President Trump do that? If so, where is your evidence?

 

You said that already. I guess adding the profanity changes.......WHAT?

 

It would have happened in Jan 2021 fool.

 

I didn't say anything profane, fool. But, I'll ask you again, where is the evidence to support your claim?

 

Must you always put yourself on the wrong end of every argument?

The crime-fraud exception applies only to current and planned violations, and not to past events . . . Einstein.

 

My evidence? Do you think I am the DOJ or the FBI? There is something called an investigation. It's the process by which the evidence is discovered based on what is already known from sources like witnesses, communications, paper trails, etc. Maybe you've heard of those since your ilk has relied on them so often. Same thing, only without the phony partisan smear job.

 

Are you trying to say that if you commit fraud with the help of your lawyer, there is a statute of limitations? OK

 

Like the evidence that Comey said he verified on Hillary and the crimes (all which apply to the statutes named in the Trump warrant) yet the partisan FBI said no one would prosecute? Is that what you are referring too?

 

Nothing to do with the SOL . . . If an offense is already committed, it is privileged.

Go ahead, don’t check if you don’t want to face reality.

 

Sooo… you now have evidence that counsel was part of a crime. Please show a source.

 

Aye Caramba, you are thick in the head! First, you said this:

Then, you said this:

So, unless President Trump told his lawyers that he was going to commit a crime (of which you obviously have NO evidence or else you would proffer it), the crime-fraud exception is a moot point. So, why did you even bring it up? Don't answer that; we know you're a fool.

So, any documents dealing with President Trump and his attorneys would be considered protected under attorney-client privilege.

Just so you'll know what attorney-client privilege is, here's the definition:

A communication is “confidential” if not intended to be disclosed to third persons other than those to whom disclosure is made in furtherance of the rendition of professional legal services to the client or those reasonably necessary for the transmission of the communication.

It has nothing to do with crime-fraud exception. Please, if you don't know what you're talking about, it's best if you just keep your mouth shut.

 

It’s better to be though a fool than open your mouth and remove all doubt.

 

There's a very common phrase which modest, self-aware people frequently use, and JN obviously doesn't ever utter . . . "I don't know what I don't know".

 

Oh, we've reached the point where all you have left is other people's wisdom applied as if the first one to use it, is automatically the self-proclaimed winner.

Yawn....

 

Unless your lawyer knew about it in the first place and I'm willing to bet Rudy knew everything. Everyone in the Trump circle knew everything. Why do you think so many have fought subpoenas and pleaded the 5th so many, many times?
You all look like clowns defending this disgusting criminal and that will not age well either. Just accept the reality that will inevitably end in the demise of your cult leader. He is going down for his lifetime of criminal behavior. And it's about damn time.
And please don't give anyone else political advice. Your record is deplorable as are you.

 

I often wonder how weak a person must feel to look at Donald Trump and see strength.

 

That's it JN, go back to sleep . . . at least then everything that emerges from your mouth is more intelligible.

 

Oh nooooooo! That's it? I feel like I have just been scolded.

The weakness in you guys manifests itself in such strange ways.