RELEASE THE AFFIDAVIT!!!

AG Garland said he wanted transparency, now he’s pushing to withhold the search affidavit of Mar-a-Lago from public view!

Idiot democrats in the media and on this forum pushed for President Trump to release a copy of the warrant (which, btw, he did NOT possess), so will they make the same cry for the release of the affidavit?

I’m waiting…….

 

Garland and the FBI took all of the information Trump had locked up, and the DOJ is now privy to more information than just what was included within the select documents he'd received a search warrant for.

Having conducted the search and seizure as they did was downright stupid with a capital S . . . fruit of the poisonous tree.

 

Sure, the DOJ is going to release details of a highly sensitive investigation with national security implications with the circus clown car on the Right spinning itself into a murderous tizzy.

That'll happen.

 

Affidavit:
“A written declaration upon oath; a statement of facts in writing signed by the affiant, and sworn to or confirmed by a declaration before a notary public, a magistrate, or other authorized officer.”
What are you scared of little joe? Did the F.B.I. Lie like they did to the FISA court? Why did the F.B.I. judge shop and get a far leftist magistrate that had to recuse himself just six weeks prior? Why did the FBI want the cameras turned off? Just because you and your America hating filth are still suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome and are yet again having orgasms (for the thousandth time) where is the facts? Keep moving west, it’s not that much further to China.

 

Thanks for the oddly posted copy and paste definition. So?

 

So, bureaucrats at the FBI and the DOJ are now privy to documents covered by attorney-client privilege and documents intended for a president’s eyes only. This is not a good scenario and does not bode well for the future of our country. If they won’t release the affidavit, I never want to hear the word “transparency” cross the lips of another liberal. Ever!

 

What’s the problem Joey? Aren’t you the reference nazi? Why avoid the questions coward?

 

I dislike Trump, but I do not believe the man did anything he thought would hurt our nation, or its standing.

If the only prosecutable offense that can be trumped up from all of that seized documentation evaporates before Democrat’s eyes because it was spawned from an inadmissible document not sought in the warrant, I will laugh my ass off.

 

Boy! Somethings just don't age well.

 

Forgetting something . . . ?

 

So when did Trump use bleach bit and smash electronic devices that were under subpoena? When was Billary authorized to declassify documents?

 

There is no such thing as Attorney-Client privilege if there is a crime committed. It doesn't matter who you are. That is the law.

 

Tell that to Bill and Hillary.

They’re both criminals married to lawyers . . .

 

They're not under federal investigation. Trump on the other hand.....

 

Again you are affirming your ignorance. Please, oh brilliant one, how does a lawyer defend a client if he knows he’s guilty? Why wouldn’t the lawyer be called to the stand to testify? There are exceptions, but they are rare.

 

Ex-official who investigated Hillary Clinton's emails said the documents recovered by the FBI at Trump's Mar-a-Lago were particularly 'stunning' and 'egregious'
Hannah Getahun
Sat, August 13, 2022 at 11:30 PM


Ex-official who investigated Hillary Clinton's emails said the documents recovered by the FBI at Trump's Mar-a-Lago were particularly 'stunning' and 'egregious'

• A former DOJ official who oversaw Hillary Clinton's emails said documents retrieved at Mar-a-Lago were "egregious."
  
  
• FBI agents found Trump with 11 sets of highly sensitive government information.
  
  
• One set of documents contained Sensitive Compartmented Information.
  

A former Justice Department official who oversaw the investigation of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's emails said the sensitivity of the documents that the FBI retrieved from Mar-a-Lago was "particularly stunning and particularly egregious."

On Monday, the FBI searched former President Donald Trump's Palm Beach, Florida, home and seized 11 sets of classified documents from the former president. Trump is being investigated by the DOJ over whether or not he violated three federal laws, including the Espionage Act.

According to a search warrant released by the Department of Justice, one of these sets of Top Secret information was designated as Sensitive Compartmented Information, which is the highest level of sensitivity a classified document can receive.

"The fact that he had SCI material out in the wild, so to speak, at risk is particularly stunning and particularly egregious," David Laufman, the former chief of the Department of Justice's counterintelligence division, told anchor Erin Burnett on CNN.

The release of Top Secret information can cause "exceptionally grave damage" to national security, according to Executive Order 13526.

One of Trump's many defenses following the search was that the documents found in his home had been declassified, but there is little evidence this is the case.

Laufman told CNN that Trump had a "consistent flagrant disregard for the protection of classified information and disregard for the Intelligence Committee throughout his presidency" and was not surprised the former President was holding on to Top Secret government papers.

"Having said that, it is nonetheless shocking to me having overseen prosecutions of multiple defendants under provisions of Espionage Act, to see that same statute leveled as a foundation for a search warrant executed on the home of a former president of the United States," Laufman said.

Laufman also said the discovery of the documents during the FBI's search "completely validates the government's investigation" into the former President.

"Whether this investigation transforms into an outright criminal prosecution remains to be seen," Laufman said.

 

Why aren’t they. Plenty of evidence, just no Clinton derangement syndrome to prosecute them…. Says Comey!

 

The crime-fraud exception Einstein.

What are the limitations on attorney-client privilege? The main limitation is the crime-fraud exception . This means that if you tell your lawyer that you’re planning to commit a crime or fraud, the lawyer is required to disclose that information.

Here's some advice. Never assume the rest of us are as dumb as you are. It never ends well....for you.

 

This is another lie regurgitated by the leftist media and YOU. The report said “documents marked classified” C/S/TS. That doesn’t mean they still were. Where’s the nuclear documents?

 

Yes, but not if you admitted to a previous crime dumbazz. If you are so deranged to think that there is planned crimes on record in those documents, check yourself in to the nursing home now for dementia.