Well, IT DOES in theory. Look at an ant colony or a beehive. Tiny creatures that have thrived for milleniums for the good of the group. Hey, it kind of worked for the Borg on Star Trek next generation as well. Schools of "prey fish" utillise "communist" techniques to survive. Herds of "prey" animals use it too. People mess it up. Goals and aspirations taint it. It's our nature. Hell, we even mess it up in the animal kingdom. We breed bees to be more productive and create "Viola" killer bees. We decimate fish populations. We damn near eliminated Buffalo. So who's going to be smarter in the long run? The insect world, the animal world or the human world? Nope I'm not a communist just typing out loud. clembo
What about looking at them as working to protect and feed the Queen and her offspring They are hardly Comunist but Royalist, the ultimate Monarchy LOL Sorry but I coudnt help myself
No problem but I think you got my point. Thinking communism is better in theory than a Monarchy to a peasant though.
Communism and hive/herd living aren't similar. In fully achieved communism, in theory, all work together to accomplish the task, but products are taken and then distributed equally. Whereas, in hive/herd living, although they do work together to accomplish their tasks, the Queen/Alpha leader gets first dibs on food, the choicest mates (Philip?), the best housing, etc. That being said, you were right about humans screwing it up. Only divine intervention can save us. (Easter, hmmmmm......)
