Clever smokescreen, and I'm not buying it.

Director Comey's letter today was carefully crafted . . . reviewed and approved by Loretta Lynch, or higher, no doubt:



" . . . we reviewed all of the communications that were to or from Hillary Clinton while she was Secretary of State."

Interesting, isn't it that no mention is made of any other communications, some of which, certainly included Hillary's communications within chains of emails to and from persons other than Hillary, as well as references to her actions / communications?

Surely, in the course of the Weiner investigation, there were communications found between parties other than Hillary which mentioned HRC decisions / choices / communications.

I'd like to have just one FBI agent chime in, letting us know if Comey and Lynch are deliberately suppressing potentially incriminating evidence that should be released for public consumption . . . just one . . . that's all it takes to break open this dam of corruption.

It'd be great to see so many Washington elites finally pouring over the spillway.

 

So, the investigation of Weiner continues. The Clinton issue is back where it was--dead in the water. All you did was try to cast aspersions on the FBI and the Justice Department--that may titillate and gratify you, but it hardly speaks to your insight regarding this episode. Rather the contrary.

 

Wrong . . . the Clinton issue will be front and center as long as she walks the face of the Earth . . . she's the sort who kisses you on the lips while urinating on your shoes, and it will eventually catch up with her.

Wrong again, I chastised Comey and Lynch, who are mere figureheads who speak for, but do not represent the men and women that work in those agencies.

Believe what serves your cause, but the specific language chosen in that letter is mis-directing, and very consistent with the dodges the Clintons, Obama and their ilk have employed in the past to dance around the facts. Unfortunately, most Americans do not think critically enough to catch subtleties like that - exactly what the politician's count on. It allows them to use a small omission of the truth to hide a great big lie.

 

I guess you really have no idea how transparent your blustering is. It's pretty funny, but it's outdone by your ridiculous mutterings about conspiracy. I don't have a "cause" here; I'm just pointing out that your recycled right wing hot air really doesn't have any bearing on reality.

 

It's kind of a shame that, while I respect your intelligence, I pity your inability to apply it perceptively.

You should be better able to deduce Hillary's true nature from the preponderant evidence, but your liberal allegiance has erected an emotional barrier that separates you from the rational conclusion you should be able to draw.

 

"Hillary's true nature" has nothing to do with whether there is a substantial basis to bring charges. The "preponderant evidence" that matters here is what the FBI found, and they have said more than once that what they found doesn't rise to the level of an indictable offense.

All the overblown fear-mongering about "what a monster!!" and the long-standing Clinton derangement syndrome which drives the repeated fruitless attempts to tear her down would be funny, if it weren't for the fact that this absurd fixation of the right will very likely prevent the country from moving forward. It's a childish mindset, exemplified by the 70 year old tantrum-throwing toddler that the Republicans chose to represent them in the presidential election.

 

I think Republicans are batshit insane over the fact that they have tried and tried to throw everything they have at her and nothing sticks except their resolve to keep throwing everything they have at her. It must get frustrating to think you are right only to be proven wrong again and again. It seems the only recourse is to fault the entire system for your own failures.

 

We can add you to the list of people that 'illary has fooled. I thought you were more intelligent than that, Recusant.

 

BS . . . Comey's hands are tied behind his back. Everyone knows that, and libs smugly walk off having won another skirmish, but this is war and, because the Clinton's cannot change their bad habits, they will eventually come up with the short end of the stick.

 

How did it come to pass that Hillary's State Dept mails wound up sharing space, on Weiner's computer, right there with the dick pics he was sending to underage girls?
Just to keep score....
Hillary's emails have been found in the possession of Weiner, her maid, the Russians, hacker Julian Assange. Did I leave anyone out?

 

I'd wager there's important HRC content in threads on devices belonging to many others, not to exclude Obama, Jarret, Schultz, Reid, Pelosi, Schumer, Kerry, Podesta, Lynch, etc.

 

No doubt. That list probably includes Vladimir Putin, Kim Jong Un, the entire Iranian leadership and some perverts besides Anthony Weiner and Bill Clinton.

Hillary put American lives in danger yet liberals still like her for some odd reason.