I must admit in all honesty and with complete and utter sincerity that the only way I can perceive that Hillary is lying is when her lips are moving.
Cool video of Hillary. I can't hear the audio but judging by her body language; it appears that the question to Hillary is how do you bake a cake? Hillary uses her hands showing, how should I know, Bill does the cake baking.
Does the fact that she changed her mind on the issue bother you or the fact that she no longer believes as you do since you still hate same sex marriage? It seems like a pretty desperate attempt to criticize someone. You seem to like people that decide something and never ever change their opinion. Absolutists like you get swept aside all the time. People that grow and change over time earn my respect. And by the way, you can't point to anyone on either side that hasn't changed their opinion on some issue. Again, another hollow criticism strictly because you fear her. Grow a pair.
If You’re Liberal and You Think Hillary Clinton Is Corrupt and Untrustworthy, You’re Rewarding 25 Years of GOP Smears Chez Pazienza on January 31, 2016 FILED TO: Headline Articles Bernie Sanders will never be president. Let’s just get that out of the way right now. He stands very little chance of pulling down the Democratic nomination and no chance at all of winning a general election. His rabid acolytes can argue with this all they want but they’ll be wrong for several inarguable reasons: because the “political revolution” Bernie Sanders needs to advance his campaign and agenda is pie-in-the-sky thinking that simply doesn’t occur in representative democracies like ours, where change always comes incrementally and our entire system is designed so it can’t be remade in one fell swoop; because he’s a one-note candidate who concerns himself with nothing other than his admittedly noble lifelong obsession with wealth inequality; because America isn’t evolved enough to elect an avowed socialist, democratic or otherwise, and it unfortunately won’t get near someone who openly eschews religion; and maybe most importantly because once the GOP considered Bernie a sworn enemy rather than the perfect foil it can use to destroy Hillary Clinton, it would eat him alive. Eat. Him. Alive. She’s a lying liar and a cheating cheat. She’s a political Cthulu who drives men to madness by sheer force of her inhuman will and absolute malevolence. This is the caricature version of Hillary Clinton the right has carefully cultivated and hammered into the national consciousness for decades now. And if you’re a liberal who believes these things about Clinton — if you see her as anything other than a liberal Democrat who’s guilty of nothing more than being a politician with faults and with a plethora of enemies like every other on this planet, including Bernie Sanders — you’ve proven that the protracted smear campaign against this woman has worked. You prove that the GOP won a long time ago. There are reasons you may choose not to vote for Hillary Clinton in 2016, but one would hope they’re policy issues rather than problems with her personality — because the “personality” that’s been sold to the American electorate is largely manufactured, and not by Clinton herself (another facet of the smear: that she’s a phony). The reality is that Clinton was one of the most liberal members of the Senate during her time there, ranking within ten points of progressive messiah Bernie Sanders and her history as a crusader for progressive causes is precisely what so motivated the GOP to destroy her in the first place. As far as the right was concerned, Clinton stepped far over the line when she pushed for healthcare reform way back in 1993 and her activist past informed a future as a “difficult woman.” By the way, it hardly needs to be said but many of the conservative attacks on Clinton throughout the decades have been the product of rank sexism. Men rarely get labeled difficult or abrasive and their general likability isn’t often called into question. Those are all buzzwords employed specifically to knock empowered women down a peg. And Hillary Clinton has been subjected to them — and so much worse — her entire political career. Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders share a lot of the same basic policy prescriptions. The difference is one of method. Sanders makes sweeping pronouncements and talks of a revolution that will be so undeniable that it will upend the American political system as it’s been for decades and silence all who oppose. Clinton, on the other hand, promises that she’ll continue to fight tirelessly for liberal causes and concedes that at times that fight won’t yield perfection but it will yield results that benefit people’s lives. She promises to build on the legacy of one of the most effective liberal presidents this country has ever seen. Sanders says it all needs to be torn down and started from scratch because too many compromises have already been made. Sanders wants to fundamentally change American hearts and minds. Clinton wants to formulate a plan of action that gets things done. Sanders sells idealism. Clinton sells pragmatism. And the problem is that pragmatism isn’t a sexy sell, even though it’s an essential quality in an effective leader. The thing is, both Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders are good people, though — and that’s what some seem to be forgetting. Hillary is no more an establishment shill than any other American politician, if by establishment you mean that she works within the U.S. government and is therefore subject to its bottom line. Even Sanders, for all his beatified status on the left, has to adhere to political reality if he wants to get anything at all accomplished. He can’t simply wave a magic wand and get what he wants, not even if he has the political capital provided by the support of a large part of the electorate. What Hillary Clinton isn’t is this grotesque self-parody that a quarter-century of Republican “vetting” has reduced her to for far too many. An overwhelming number of the so-called controversies that have dogged Clinton’s career are either whole-cloth creations or convenient manipulations by the GOP. You can say you don’t want to vote for Hillary Clinton because she’s scandal-prone and who wants to go through another four or eight years of that. But remember two things: One, no matter what Democratic candidate gets elected, he or she will face a daily trial by fire from irrationally outraged conservatives. Seven years of Barack Obama-fueled insanity proves that. Two, the supposed scandals that Clinton’s been enduring for the past 25 years are mostly nonsense. The GOP wouldn’t have it any other way. And they couldn’t be happier that right now so many liberals have turned against the woman they utterly despise in favor of someone they’re fully aware they can beat. Because they understand she’s the only thing standing in their way in 2016. They can’t beat her. And they know it.
You obvious did not listen to much of the 13 minutes. It goes on to include; Progressive/moderate 90-95% of my email were in the system/DOS found 1% were in the system Email from Bill/Bill never used email I represented Wall Street/Wall Street too big to fail Home buyers to blame for the recession/Wall Street to blame for the recession Etc. And so forth
Yep! You are right. Isn't it really nasty when they take her own words and replay them? Kinda sounds like what happens to you.
You seem unusually fixated on someone that you're not even voting for. Who are you trying to convince? You're failing miserably.
Not voting for? WOW! And just who is fixated on someone who is not even running? Hint; Look at your signature! And, you are obviously not voting for any Republican, but you add; There are two kinds of Republicans: Millionaires and suckers. Now, Just who is trying to convince whom?
That you are! That would include lying, Hypocrisy, cheating, violence, threats, lack of facts, insults when you run out of lies, poor math, etc.
