One of the debate moderators last night asked a candidate something about going to war is a bad idea because civilians could be victims of it, so I wonder if it does matter what happens to people in other countries. I also wonder if it should then also matter that infants are victims of abortions at Planned Parenthood?
He's yearning for a a republican of that era while complaining about the Democrats of that era. Note: Reagan was a Democrat in that era and Hillary was a republican. Maybe he should vote for Hillary.
So Reagan saw the light & switched parties while Hildebeest liked what she saw in Byrd & became a dimocrat? Yep, sounds about right.
It matters if we are the ones killing them. I don't care about PP. Nice way to conflate two unrelated issues. I could throw guns deaths in and really muddy the water.
It matters to me because the percentage of actual fighters that would be killed in a "carpet-bombing" campaign would likely be small compared to the civilian casualties...the "collateral damage" which Trump suggested was inconsequential or immaterial to our purpose or stated goal: destroying ISIL.
Killing millions of innocent civilians in order to destroy a few thousand armed militants tends to ignite a few fuses.
One of Trump's comments in Rolling Stone, that he would date his daughter if he wasn't her father, bothers some of his supporters.
Where is rlm's cents and CoinOKC to refute this graph??? Ha, ha! I am sure they will accuse you of finding it at one of your favorite unscrupulous sites.
You mean the one that both Obama and Lerner have admitted was a lie? Apparently the ones that the IG documented have been excluded from his memory. And these questions have been approved to violate the law when used against the right; Another question asked of some unidentified applicants was: Provide the following information for the income you received and raised for the years from inception to the present. Also, provide the same information for the income you expect to receive and raise for 2012, 2013, and 2014. a. Donations, contributions, and grant income for each year, which includes the following information: The names of the donors, contributors, and grantors. If the donor, contributor, or grantor has run or will run for a public office, identify the office. If not, please confirm by answering this question "No". The amounts of each of the donations, contributions, and grants and the dates you received them. How did you use these donations, contributions, and grants? Provide the details. If you did not receive or do not expect to receive any donation, contribution, and grant income, please confirm by answering "None received" and/or "None expected".[20] The Tennessee organization Linchpins of Liberty, which mentored high school and college students, was asked the following: 23. Has any person or organization provided educational services to you? If yes, provide the following: a) The name of the person or organization. b) A full description of the services provided. c) The political affiliation of the person or organization. 24. Provide all details regarding training you have provided or will provide. Indicate who has received or will receive the training and provide copies of the training material.[65]
Point being, the IRS scandal that wasn't never actually had to be real. As long as the completely debunked lie is of use to the Right, facts and reality are irrelevant. Most of their favorite memes are just wildly overstated lies and comments taken out of context meant to give their ignorant base something to parrot in forums like this. Here is how their memes work on the stupid conservative.
As an aspiring writer, would you care to translate that into common English? That is how you arrive at your conclusions? And you are calling Obama, the IG and Lerner all liars. In August 2010, the IRS distributed a BOLO (Be on the Lookout) list for Tea Party organizations applying for tax exempt status. “You’ve got this back office, and they’re going after the Tea Party." Omama On May 10, in advance of the public release of the audit findings, Director of the IRS Exempt Organizations division Lois Lerner answered what was later revealed to be a planted question by stating that the IRS was "apologetic" for what she termed "absolutely inappropriate" actions.[83] On May 10, 2013, during a bar meeting, Ms. Lerner admits targeting, calling it “absolutely incorrect, insensitive, and inappropriate.” Four days later, on May 14, 2013, the Inspector General issued a report confirming targeting.
Well, moron joe, given what you've volunteered concerning your kids, I'm surprised this would even register on your radar.
I volunteered nothing. It is your perverted obsession that you continue to use as masturbation fodder that you're thinking of. Thank goodness you never have to meet the person you are so fixated on. He is 6"-5" about 220 lbs. I think you'd be pissing your pants you doughy pant-load.
So no posts? I guess that means your posts were in error. Just like your nonexistent "gun show loophole", like the work force participation rate is due to the baby boomers [not] retiring, Zimmerman is guilty, "Hands up. Don't shoot", etc.
Hehehe... If I spent my time refuting every graph Moron Joe posts, I wouldn't have time for anything else.