Breaking News: By a 59-41 vote, the Senate rejects legislation to green-light the controversial Keystone XL pipeline. fxn.ws/1zzsH7t
I am opposed to the pipeline because it's a subsidy to private business. I am opposed to Corporate Welfare in general. The oil companies have enough money without getting taxpayer handouts.
What am I missing? The bill was nothing more than an authorization to construct; What does that have to do with "Corporate Welfare". BTW, just how much do you think the oil companies are making per gallon? And just where do you thing that puts them on the profitability scale?
I'm anti-Welfare period, whether it goes to individual people who are too lazy to work, or to Exxon-Mobil. Nothing you can say will ever change me into a pro-Welfare advocate.
Nobody "needs" it. Paul LePage's Welfare Reform plan is a good start at reducing the problem, but it needs to start at every level from the lazy individual who won't work because welfare is too easy all the way up to Exxon-Mobil who obviously doesn't need any taxpayer money at all.
What about the unemployable. People without the mental or social ability to push a cart from point A to point B. Where do they fit in your plan? People you wouldn't hire? Work houses, prisons, wouldn't that also be considered a form of welfare?
All great questions. Yes, welfare IS needed. The abuse is what needs to be taken out of the equation.
Absolutely, I don't think it's as black and white as Peter is making it out. In Paul LaPage's plan, he provides 5 years of assistance but also has enforcement to make sure people are playing by the rules. The difficult part of enforcement is that there is no such thing as a perfect law or procedure. Truly gifted scumbags know the law better than most of those enforcing it, and are quiet accomplished technocrats when it comes to abusing the system. Finding the right balance of enforcement is exceedingly difficult especially in a bureaucracy which is steeped in procedure in order to dodge accountability. Some forms of corporate welfare does have it's place. Tax breaks offered to large employers are common when cities compete for industries. The tax breaks are offset by the spinoffs resulting from the new business. One dollar in tax breaks can generate 3 to 4 dollars of additional revenue from supporting business.
But apparently oil companies are the exception even though they have one of the lowest profit margins out there while Google has a profit margin nearly 10 times any oil company remains everyone's darling.