Just in case anyone was wondering. lol I don't really hate her, just don't think she's fit to be President. Her whole claim to fame is that she married Bill Clinton. That makes her qualified to be President? Just like being George H.W. Bush's son make George W. Bush qualified, right? And look at the sheet that got us in. IT DOESN'T TAKE A VILLAGE TO RAISE A CHILD! I Cringe so hard whenever I see anyone say that. No, Hillary, it doesn't take a village to raise a child. It just takes involved parents. The only time it takes a village is when the parents check out of their responsibility and then others have to step in and take over. If kids have involved parents, the rest is going to take care of itself. I do NOT want Hillary's help raising my children, and fear what kind of communistic policies she's going to force upon us to make her "it takes a village" dream come true. Stay out of my life Hillary and I hope you lose the primary.
She was also a Senator, the Secretary of State, a lawyer, and yes, spent 8 years in the White House as the First Lady. Who can you name with that much experience? I personally don't like political family dynasties be they Bush's or Clintons. I'll take Elizabeth Warren.
She has a lot more qualifications than our current IOC. BTW, IMO qualifications are no longer the determinant. It is much more of a popularity contest than one of ability.
If the Republicans don't pull their heads out of their collective arses soon expect Bill Clinton to possibly be our "First Husband" in the White House.
The way women feel about Republicans these days, Hillary is a shoo-in. Minorities will just pump up the numbers for the Dems.
Hillary probably wont run, her negatives are too high. Our next Resident will be Elizabeth Warren. If she runs, she'll just be dumped on again. The woman is a professional doormat.
I don't think Warren is going to run. The Democrat leadership is pressuring her hard to not run.She'd really take the wind out of Hillary's sails. She's everything Hillary will never be.
I am no fan of Warrens progressive ( socialist) politics, BUT, the Woman has a rock solid stance against The Fed and " too big to fail banks" , and that is an important issue.
I believe Warren has a soul and a conscience, and that is a problem for her, even with her otherwise radical views. Nice to talk with you Peter
It's probably going to be a Hillary/Warren ticket. Sad, because Warren is as worthless as a tit on a boar. In other words, she's a pie-in-the-sky liberal who doesn't understand how the world works. After 8 years of Obama, however, it's going to be a very tough row to hoe for the Democrats in 2016. After all, Obama has been polled as the worst president since WWII and because of their realization that Obama wasn't the savior they were praying for, the wind is out of their sails. The Democrats will soon start telling more lies (like Obama did about being able to keep your doctor) in order to garner votes in November. They'll do the same thing in 2016. I seriously doubt we're going to see a Democrat administration in January, 2017. Vote Ben Carson
Nah, I don't think Warren will be on the ticket. I think she's going to stay in the Senate. Yes, she's a pie in the sky liberal. I think the Republicans should worry about her more for 2020, assuming they win it in 2016 (they're doing their best to screw that one up, do they think people really give a shit about Benghazi?). Warren can talk the talk, just like Obama did in 2008. Whether she's hollow like Obama, or has substance to it, I don't think anyone can really say till she gets a chance to show what's she's made of. What I do know is that I won't be voting for Hillary. I don't know who the Republicans are going to put up, but from what I've seen there's a very good chance I'll be looking for a third party to vote for in 2016.
The Right wingers first complained that Obama didn't have enough experience to be president. Now they say Clinton doesn't have enough experience. I think the only experience they will accept is the experience of a corrupt Republican Governor. They certainly have a lot to choose from these days.
And even the NY Times (not exactly a bastion of conservatism) agrees. Their jeadline was; "New York Times editorial board says administration has 'lost all credibility'" http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/...dministration-lost-credibility_n_3398666.html
This Hillary/Elizabeth Warren fiasco is gonna get good! As soon as BO publically endorses Warren, the dominos will begin to fall...then we'll see who will line-up behind who. *might need to stock up on the popcorn!
I didn't say that Hillary is unqualified because of lack of experience. I said that I don't want her to be President because I don't like the things she says. I used the "it takes a village" thing to express my concerns about her. I do NOT want my children to be raised by a collective. I'm doing quite well raising them by myself, thank you very much. I really hate it when lefty teachers tell me what I should and shouldn't be doing with my kids. I think it's a damn shame how many parents these days aren't very involved with their kids, and leave it up to the schools, but this whole "it takes a village" thing just makes it worse. Instead of saying "it takes a village" how about saying to those damn lazy parents that they are personally responsible for raising their own kids? THAT is why I think Hillary is not qualified to be our leader.
