It's funny that you accuse IQ and me of coming to rescue each other when in reality he rarely bothers posting and all you three ever do is cluster f**k each other's posts day in and day out. You simply have to love the irony not to mention the utter hypocrisy.
It know it's painful for you when he posts his silliness (you've made that clear!) but give the loser a break & let him post.
Painful? Hardly, he takes you 3 about as seriously as most people take a hangnail. Annoying sure, but not worth a trip to the ER. This behavior you three constantly engage in of crawling so far up each other's asses that your proctologists ask for consults is exactly the behavior you accuse everyone else of. There is just something wrong with people that constantly practice a behavior that they constantly accuse others of. There is just no ability from your ilk to look at yourselves before you run off screaming about someone else being racist, homophobic, misogynist, or any other prejudice. Something definitely wrong with you and from what I can see, you three aren't worth the waste of time of people like IQ. You guys are the one's after all that still deny climate change in spite of all the vast scientific consensus. That takes some extra special stupid to achieve and you seem to do it with ease. Good for you. Given all that, why would any of us take any of you seriously? I can't answer that. It's obvious that all 3 of you toe the party line without the slightest variation and you belong to the most anti-science, anti-intellect, anti-education, anti-brain cell party in the country. Only the GOP would try to outlaw critical thinking ala Texas. Nice going GOP. What will you "know" tomorrow?
Interesting conclusion especially considering that there is one here and only one who voted a straight party line.
A for instance, you can believe in science or not. It doesn't care. Your silly attachment to ideology is as irrelevant as your opinions. “The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it.” ― Neil deGrasse Tyson
When drawing up lists of who still opposes U.S. efforts to address the climate crisis, it’s a shrinking group. Indeed, at first blush, we’re effectively left with polluters and Republicans. But taking a closer look, that’s not a fair characterization – as is the case in so many areas, there’s a difference between what Republican voters think and what Republican policymakers think. A lopsided and bipartisan majority of Americans support federal limits on greenhouse gas emissions, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll that also finds most are willing to stomach a higher energy bill to pay for it. Fully 70 percent say the federal government should require limits to greenhouse gases from existing power plants, the focus of a new rule announced Monday by the Environmental Protection Agency. An identical 70 percent supports requiring states to limit the amount of greenhouse gas emissions within their borders…. Democrats and Republicans are in rare agreement on the issue.That last part is the most unexpected aspect of the results. As is the case in the debate over gun safety and immigration, the divide is not between Democrats and Republicans. Rather, it’s between elected Republican officials and the American mainstream – since GOP voters don’t toe the party line. Consider this in chart form. View attachment 2546
Don't worry about the source. It's not like you believe any source but FOX anyway. Just know the source is... NOT FOX!!!! That's all you need to know.
Here is the take away from the bar chart. As you go from Democrat to Independent to Republican and support for regulating green house gases decreases, you can see the level of stupidity increase.
Recusant said it best. Here are some responses to posts in other threads regarding the failure to provide sources. I tend to agree with him.
OK, if you don't want to cite your source, it's fine. I don't believe a single word that spews from your hole anyway.
