Hillary Clinton: Advocate For Women? NO, JUST A HYPOCRITE!

Really?

 

Hold the presses! David, did you really say that Hillary is running? I'd sure like to see that post if you don't mind pointing it out for us.

Or better yet, GUY MEDLEY would you point out that post to the rest of us? Try as I might, I can't seem to find it. Perhaps your computer software is displaying different posts than mine. If that's the case, I'll contact Peter (the forum owner) or the moderator and see what's going on with the software.

 

Heck, who else can they run? Biden? Kerry? Pelosi? Jerry Brown? Stuart Smalley?
Including Hillary, I can't think of a single dim who deserves to be taken seriously. Can you?

 

Can you think of one republican? Any one of you? Its easy to pick apart an opponent when you haven't the guts to name one on your own side. Its very simple. One guy. We all know who the prospects are, lets not pretend. I just want one of you to name one. How hard can it be? Show me why Hilary is the worst candidate by naming one you think is better. You won't, and it'll be answered by another scatterbrained response. Because you and I know, you have nobody. Not a prayer in hell.

 

I agree, so what's your point?

 

To name one. You found all the faults possible in a democratic prospect, lets see how one of your holds up to scrutiny. Or can't you take it like you dish it?

 

Certainly not from the current crop of hopeful dims. Surely the dims aren't thinking of running an old, brain-damaged saddlebag like Hillary Clinton! Are they?

But, if they want someone old, I still say they should run Jimmy Carter again. He's only 89 (not too much older than Hillary), he's white (just like Hillary) and he's already proved that he can win the presidency (unlike Hillary). He could only complete one term, but that might give the dims time to find a viable candidate.

 

That would be like when you guys ran McCain. Guess when it's a republican old age is just fine.

 

They can't even name ONE person who MIGHT run...LLLOOOLLL

They need someone else to tell them. OK, I'll do it, just like I did last time: Romney appears interested, as does Huckabilly, Newt, Ryan, and Cruz...TO NAME A FEW.

Was THAT so difficult? LLLOOOLLL

 

Old is fine. But old AND brain-damaged? Try again.

 

It took some brain damage to decide on Palin as a running mate. But I think McCain realizes that now, so at least he's capable of learning, and thats good news.

 

Exactly! They do this gutless criticism every election and think nobody notices. They haven't the courage to support anyone until they have been anointed by the rest of the GOP sheepeople. Wussy losers.

 

Wait for the parrots to repeat what I said.



"What he said! What he said! Squawwwwk!"

 

I guess moron joe & iqless missed this piece?

 

Oh-Oh! 3 against 2. Those kind of odds scare the stooges. Now watch 'em run away.

 

Ok, you brought up Palin, so let's play the comparison game...
Like Hillary, she is of age & born in the US. By your reasoning she should be a qualified candidate, right?

 

It's 2 against 2, right?
I mean you & iqless should only count as one since you both say exactly the same thing post after post

 

Neither of you 2 have named anyone you'd support so you pretty much are just the same opinion coming from two different assholes.

 

Didn't you read what Guy posted & I isolated twice? C'mon, keep up.

 

And, she has actually managed a government - unlike Hillary and Barry.