Sad Little Men of the GOP

Because I was talking about the 7.1 million enrollees and you changed the subject to who paid without skipping a beat or even identifying that you had transitioned to an entirely new subject. That is just what communicating with YOU is like. word salad ala Sarah Palin. Why don't you go figure out the proper use of the language of the country you grew up in and come back when you can communicate at least as well as an elementary student and stop blaming others for your own ignorance because we can't decipher your gibberish . We'd appreciate it.

 

Do you have numbers of how many are overdue?

 

So apparently I caught you in another lie. You idiot.

There, is my F**ing word salad F**ing better now?

 

Obama and company have not released them? Gee, I wonder why. According to Mr. RB, it might be about 80%, but for all we no it could be 50% or 90%.

 

It is said that the higher you are in intelligence, the less likely you are to be happy. I think I know why. They have to deal with fools like you who have to be just so damn happy.

 

You wish for me to copy that post here also?

 

So, you really don't have any evidence that even one person is behind on payment?

 

Sebelius' testimony, the insurance company estimates, etc.

 

Thank you for citing my source incorrectly. Sebelius only reported that the insurance companies themselves estimated that probably around 85% of enrollees had paid a premium so far. However, because different insurance companies have different timelines for their premium payments, you have to wait for the final numbers are totaled and people get paid. I'd say that 85% is pretty good at this point and I think that number could easily grow.

 

Funny, but it says 80% to my eyes.

So, no, I did not incorrectly cite your source.

 

a double

 

Glenn Beck is a "special" case. On the other hand, right-wing talking heads like Krauthammer who are considered "respectable" are not really that far removed from Beckville. Quite often, it's possible that he's saying what the other blowhards are only thinking.

 

I think that is a really good point and a seemingly a distinction without a difference. Not saying something but still believing it or letting others be your surrogate doesn't preclude anyone from the criticism they justly deserve. Also, there is the aspect of saying nothing making those that remain silent complicit in the message. You really never hear much ever in the way of criticism of these Right-wing extremists from anyone on the Right. They are too scared of upsetting the crazy wing of the party and that makes them no better than their extremists.

 

Wow! If ignorance was an art, you'd be friggin' Picasso.

Just for S and G's, what is the number that falls in between 80 and 90?

 

There are several (in fact, there are MANY) numbers that fall in between 80 and 90. What is the number you're referencing, Mr. Fuzzy Math?

 

So far, quoting your posts exactly as written, you have said it came from Fox, you have said it was wrong, you said I cited your source incorrectly and then I am ignorant. I guess you might as well continue your 0 for streak.

FWIW, my exact words were "it might be about 80%" and that perfectly fits your post quoting Sebelius.

As for you enrolled not being paid, try reading this line again from your post.

Now, do you really think Sebelius works for Fox and is a right wing ignorant nut case? Because that is exactly what you have tried to infer from her exact words.

Face it Mr. RB. You got caught with your own words. PERIOD!

 

I have never minded suffering fools that are kind or just benign idiots but the type of fools we have here are the worst. They are so angry, stupid, and incapable of deep thought on any subject and they blame everyone else for the things they don't like about the world. We really need to build a fenced in enclosure for them.

 

I have no idea what this has to do with Sebelius' words except to say that you obviously do not like getting them throw in your face. They are your words as well since you posted them here. So the "so angry, stupid, and incapable of deep thought on any subject and they blame everyone else for the things they don't like about the world" constitute a self description. And you are going to build a fenced in enclosure for yourself. Go for it if that makes you happy.

 

LOL. If by 80% you mean "80-90 percent" Partial redaction is incorrect. Just pick the parts you like and go with that

 

The accuracy fairness and honesty with which you cite quote and argue speaks to the credibility of your position. So far, none.