What I find most telling about your comment is that if the investigation had found even "a shred of evidence" that Christie had knowledge about this, you would have jumped all over it. But, since they didn't find anything, even after a "thorough and exhaustive" investigation, interviewing officials and reviewing over 250,000 documents you don't believe a word of it. LOL.. OK.. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink.
Exhaustive? Haven't I already pointed out the 4 key people that Christie's "investigation of himself" didn't interview? I'm pretty sure I did that already and I find it telling that you didn't bother to acknowledge that little fact.