POLL: Majority Of Voters Think Obama And Hillary To Blame For Benghazi

Ummm, all I've done is ask what they were doing during those 7+ hours so you have my permission to stop the hyperbole. You aren't the least bit curious? C'mon, you can admit it...you'll still be a far left loon.

 

Here the only reason this is being pushed. It was originally to hurt Obama's chances in 2012. When that failed miserably, the focus switch to Hillary Clinton. With Christie going down in flames and Gov. Gifty McDonnell going to jail, you losers have no viable candidate capable of beating Clinton. All you have is this never ending drumbeat of Benghazi that has produced nothing in a year and a half and only being pushed by nut cases. What does that make YOU for buying into it? Nut case wannabes? Success!!!!!

 

But then I have not been in charge of such a big screw up as Obama. The plant I ran did not blow up while I was fishing or whatever. (BTW, it had the great potential to do so and take out several square miles.) The embassy did blow up while Obama was doing something. Since he and Hillary refuse to say what they were doing, it leaves them open to speculation. Some day or maybe some year we will find out what they were or were not doing. But until then, all your deflection will not do a bit of good.

Oh! And since you read my posts, you know and knew exactly what I was doing.

 

What are you doing right now? Are you beating your boyfriend? Are you drowning kittens? I think your really should be more open and transparent. After all, you could be doing anything. Enlighten us or I'm just going to assume whatever I want.

 

Ah! So on top of your other prejudices, your are also homophobic! Why else would you try to insult David with slurs like that?

 

Buying into what?
C'mon, I've been asking this question way before this Christie deal and you know it. Aren't you the least bit curious? I'll answer that for you...sure you are but you won't admit it. So, skipping ahead, let me ask you why you wouldn't be curious. Why can Hillary ask about one's ability to respond to an emergency but we can't ask her what she did when faced with one?

Again, and with no innuendo or accusations, what were BO & Hillary doing during the 7+ hours our people were being attacked & killed? And why have they been so unwilling to answer?

 

There were 13 Benghazi's under Bush. Tell me what he was doing during each one. Tell me who even asked the question.

 

I'm glad you brought up Christie's little problem. How come an actual provable scandal has no interest for you guys while one where you can only imagine Obama and Clinton doing something... Anything... Nothing you can point to, fascinates you so much?

Your curiosity is not proof of anybody's guilt.

 

Ok, I'm sitting by the fireplace, eating lunch. Here in a few minutes I'm going to pick my daughter up at school, take her to volleyball practice then hit the Y. After that, I'll shower and we're meeting friends for dinner.
See how easy that was?

 

Only 9, incidentally. And zero unsolved. And zero ambassadors killed. Zero lies about them. Zero blaming someone else.

And then there was Obama. So far there have bee 10 embassies/consulates attacked under his administration. And the first ambassador was killed in 65 (my memory) years.

 

....ad moron joe, after a good clobbering, has made his exit from the thread...

 

Hillary & damage control?

http://nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_new...illary-clinton-talks-benghazi-gates-2016?lite

 

Just what exactly is it with the Kennedys and Clintons turning their backs on people and leaving them to die? There was Chappaquiddick with Ted Kennedy and now Benghazi with Hillary. Voters will not be so quick to let Hillary forget Benghazi should she throw her lying ass into the ring in 2016.

 

The focus was already ON Hillary and her boss, you imbecile. Maybe YOU think Benghazi was being pushed in order to hurt Obama's re-election chances, but nothing could be further from the truth. In the beginning, the Benghazi investigation was begun merely to find out the honest facts. Certainly after it became clear that Obama was hiding something and diverting attention away from the truth, his opponents naturally jumped at the opportunity to use it against him. Do you think there's anything wrong with revealing a political opponent's deceit?

People in this country expect a certain amount of transparency from our government officials and it was quickly determined that is not what we were getting. Had Obama and Hillary been truthful and forthcoming from the beginning, as opposed to being revealed as inept and deceitful, Benghazi would just be another terrible episode instead of the subject of a Senate investigation and fodder for those who clamor for an open and honest government.

 

I don't believe you. You must be hiding something. Can you prove any of that. We should have a year and a half of hearings and get to the bottom of this scandal. See how easy that is?

 

So you get the idea that these attacks are fairly common. Good for you. You have actually learned something.

 

Ah ha ha ha ha ha... You can't even get your own stories straight. What a total moron.

 

I learned that you can elide over every fact that is contrary to you mantra.
Try reading this. THE LAST US AMBASSADOR TO BE KILLED BEFORE BENGHAZI WAS 65 YEARS AGO!

 

So again, an ambassador's life counts for more than other American lives because......???????

 

Why don't you idiots simply get over it? FOX is the only group of idiots pushing this nonsense and you all obviously have been sucker in mainly due to your own gullibility. I get that you're stupid, the country gets that you're stupid, and we have moved on. Good luck with BENGHAZI, BENGHAZI, BENGHAZI, BENGHAZI, BENGHAZI, BENGHAZI, BENGHAZI, BENGHAZI, ....