President of MSNBC Calls For Investigation of FOX Ratings

Thank you for that link. Never, never have I seen Fox News explained so perfectly. I think anyone that reads it will never look at Fox the same way again.

 

I like Glen Beck...

 

And in an unrelated but still FOX news story, we have the usual FOX "journalism" practices.

Sean Hannity Can't Be Bothered With the Truth
—By Kevin Drum
Fri Oct. 18, 2013 9:06 AM PDT


Fox News

This is hilarious in a pathetic kind of way: last Friday, Sean Hannity invited three "regular families" onto his show to relate their horror stories about premium hikes and business-killing regulations under Obamacare. Eric Stern decided to call all three of them to find out what was really going on.
Answer: nothing. One of them was apparently just lying, and the other two hadn't even checked the exchanges, where they would have found that they could get better coverage for considerably less than they're paying now.
That's just sad. Hannity runs a big-time show with well-paid producers, but they apparently couldn't find even a single true example of someone who got screwed by Obamacare. How hard can that be? Even liberals acknowledge that some people will end up worse off. But Hannity's staff couldn't be bothered. I guess he figures his audience doesn't really deserve any better.

http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2013/10/sean-hannity-cant-be-bothered-truth

 

Did you even bother to look at that show or did you just believe what Mother Jones says? Tamara Holder, Pete Hegseth, Bernard Whitman, et al are not exactly "regular families". Again I quote something I have seen somewhere that you should try to follow "Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but they are not entitled to their own facts."

 

I am always amazed at the nonsense you feel passes for conversation.

Your point 1, I probably didn't watch the Hannity show therefore....? No conclusion just you guessing that I didn't see the clip of the show. Wrong! #1

Your point 2, the guests were not exactly regular families. Why would you state something like that and then not explain any further? Are you so bad at this that this is all you can come up with?
Not having a point #2

You waste my time.

It is just mind-numbing trying to figure whether you even think you have an actual point.