Little Davy Tries to Cover His Tracks Ha Ha Ha!

When called out for posting an outright Right-wing lie that you can Google and still find in countless Right-wing sources, little Davy refused to acknowledge that he was duped again but he did go back and edit his post to erase the lie. I then witnessed Jack posting the same lie. Neither one of them has acknowledged this lie they both bought into but they have gone silent.

The reason I post this isn't because I want to gloat or rub it in their faces. I know that they are immune to learning from their mistakes but this is a perfect example of the tactics often used by unscrupulous Right-wing blogs, media outlets, and paid political email spammers. Anyone who runs these phony stories should have anything they put out scrutinized to the nth degree based on this incident. Breitbart would be the first place to start since they have had plenty of chances to be honest and ethical and seem to have taken a pass at that at every turn.

Nice try Davy but wiser heads usually prevail.

The full Debunking: http://antoningregoire.wordpress.com/2013/09/01/debunked-kerry-2003-iraq-picture-war-in-syria/


David said: ↑

Did you miss the admin's screw-up when they used the photos of dead Iraqis (victims of saddam's gas attacks) to make their case instead of photos of dead Syrians? Like I said, the delivery is different but the justifications being tossed about are the exact same.​

​

Read more: http://www.partisanlines.com/threads/syria-should-we-or-shouldnt-we.50502/page-7#ixzz2e7MSbMkf​

​

​

 

I didn't go silent I just don't come here often. It would appear that I posted something untrue but not an intentional lie. Just bad info.

 

I do find it amusing that the most profilic liar on this site calls someone out lol. Means you've been lying more than ever recently. So Alinski like

 

Here is the thing Jack, I'm not calling anyone a liar, I'm pointing out that people should really learn from situations like this one. It is the sources of information that are at issue here. An unreliable source would be anyone that carried this story. I think you and little Davy were just duped by a Right-wing misinformation campaign that preys on low information voters. This lie will be out there and pushed for years I promise you. Learn from this.

 

I'm with you on this one...

 

Well, in the spirit of Obama-nuanced responses, I have this to say:

I never said Kerry "showed" the photo, I said he "used" the photo. Now, when I say "used" I was referring to him referencing "rows of bodies, wrapped in white sheets". Since there had not been any images from Syria, up to that point, of rows of bodies, wrapped in white sheets, one is left to assume he was referencing the photo in question (the one from Iraq) that had been circulated by the BBC.

 

Well then that explains perfectly why you went back and edited your post, ignored direct questions about your post when you were called out, and then went silent. Oh wait, no it doesn't! It took an entirely separate thread to even get you to respond with a "it depends what the meaning of is" type rationalization.

Now that you have backpedaled with this lame nonsense that I'll ignore, can you finally learn something from the sources you use or are you incapable of discerning the things you want to believe from the things you should actually believe?

 

You, of all people, should respect the way I responded....BO, Axelrod, Carney, Kerry, Clinton, et al make a living doing it & you (and your ilk) have a history of gobbling it up.

 

Of course you are! Jack fell for the same lie you pushed. Why wouldn't you be with him on this one. Of course, I seem to be the only one here calling out a lie while you two sit there and call me a liar while failing to acknowledge your own lies. I guess just not acknowledging them makes you "more honest"? How does that work exactly?

 

Well that seems neither here nor there given that you have yet to admit this very obvious and easily verifiable lie that you pushed. I guess deflecting the topic is as close to admitting your lies as you can come. I would think that a man would be able to admit when he made a mistake and admit it but I guess it speaks to your character....or lack thereof.

 

I can't wait for the other two parrot clowns to jump in and start defending you. They shouldn't be long.

View attachment 1973

 

.....Annnnnd we have silence again. At least you live down to my rather low opinion of you.

 

On another note, does anyone have any new conspiracy theories concerning the Boston Marathon bombing? I'd be interested in hearing those....

 

aha ha ha ha ha ha! Pathetic diversion as usual.

My point is made anyway!

 

This entire there

This entire thread was a diversion, dumbass.

 

I understand. The truth probably seems like a diversion to your ilk.

See little Davy, I told you the parrot clowns would show up soon enough to rescue you.

Again, you guys are sooooooo...., easy!

 

...and now back to John Kerry referencing a 2003 photo from Iraq to make BO's case for military action in Syria...

 

Here is John Kerry's quote (from the link provided by fog-of-war moen:​

"We saw rows of dead lined up in burial shrouds, the white linen unstained by a single drop of blood. Instead of being tucked safely in their beds at home, we saw rows of children lying side by side, sprawled on a hospital floor, all of them dead from Assad’s gas and surrounded by parents and grandparents who had suffered the same fate."​

​

 

Oh, oh! I think your pants fell down again.

 

So? Where does the 2003 photo figure in?