Syria? Should We or Shouldn't We?

People are finally wising up to his incessant attempts to blame someone else for his problems. 5 years ionto his presidency, it is about time he learns the buck stops at HIS desk and not everyone else's.

 

Exactly. If, as Obama says, the WORLD drew the red line, then let the WORLD intervene.

 

I know that you guys absolutely love a two word talking-point more than guys love a half price bikini car wash but the truth is that there was a red line established by the international community and ratified by the U.S. Congress when the treaty was signed back in the 90's by 98% of the countries banning the use of chemical weapons. The red line you love to talk about was established long before Obama and he has every right to hold the world accountable to this treaty. I don't think war is the answer myself but the red line set by the world was indeed crossed. Pull your heads out of your asses for a brief moment and look around. The truth is out there.

 

I think ol' fog-of-war has hit a new low in the BO justification game

 

It doesn't surprise me that your forked tongue is defending warhawk Obama's actions.

 

I have not defended his desire to go to war in Syria anywhere and you know that. I have set the record straight on yet another talking point that strays so far from the truth, lies have to look behind them to see it. Deal with it dick.

 

Why don't you tell us all again how Kerry showed a picture from 2003 from Iraq and said it was from Syria. This time just admit that the Right-wing blogosphere lied to you and you fell for it hook, line, and sinker again. For once.

Better yet, Google all the blogs like Breitbart that carried this nonsense and NEVER believe anything they say again. It might help you look a little less foolish in the future, a little, maybe, ah who am I kidding, you look like idiot no matter what you do.

 

"war hawk Obama"? Remind me again which wars Obama has started as I seem to have forgotten. I think the world does need to enforce their policies and rules or what's the point in having them? However, enforcing them is not a one country obligation, specifically not ours. If the rest of the world is going to pussyfoot their way around the agreements they signed hoping someone else will risk the lives, money and effort to solve them, then I say we let those other countries stand alone to their own defense as we say f@$k it and walk away.

 

Exactly! It's not like the delusional Obama hating crowd can actually point to any wars that the "war hawk Obama' of their imaginations has us involved in. While they gave Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz a complete pass, they create this fantasy of Obama as a war hawk. Never trust stupid.

 

Waiting Davy!

 

Hahahaha!

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi...it.html#ooid=Y1N2M4ZTr2QG58D3bAKM__ljNVc-q8-N

 

At least David made you laugh.

 

Going back here rlm but yes I DID notice your wording.