I'll give your drunken ass some facts. I won't kick people when they are already living on the edge of society. I leave that activity to the repukes. Food stamps primarily go to families with kids. Has there ever been abuse of the food stamp program? Probably, but for every 1 person abusing the program, I would bet that there are another 100 just being able to feed their kids and get by another day. The repukes wish to paint every single welfare recipient as a worthless loser and condemn the majority of recipients as being the same as the abusers of the system. You losers never talk about the millions of people helped by the program and you can never actually give me a figure of those abusing the program. It could be 1%, 5%, 8% but you have no idea do you? You obviously just want to paint all welfare recipients as abusers. Keep kicking the people most affected by the economy. They always do so much better when the compassion of your boots kick them square in the teeth. Jesus must be so happy with you. Don't listen to me, when you die of liver failure, you can tell him of your compassionate ways yourself.
The repukes plan: 1. Destroy the economy 2. Bail out the wealthy 3. Blame those most affected by the bad economy 4. Kick the poorest of the poor off of food assistance 5. Call them dependent for supporting Democrats 6. Deregulate the banks and start the process all over again.
Gee, the libs sure get testy when helping people free themselves from the vicious cycle of gov't dependence is mentioned, don't they?
None of them work. All of them get money from the government. All of them whine if someone else does. All of 'em are hypocrites.
See! No facts to counter anything I've said. Just snarky insults and nonsense when they are cornered. Typical. They are too easy for my talents.
Right! Because that large red dip before Obama took office was Obama's fault before he took office. What was bush handed vs what he handed to Obama? Facts you can't acknowledge? Oh yeah! View attachment 1908
You want a fact - that "destroyed economy" (that you credit Obama with recovering) that has added more than 15,000,000 to the needy rolls has been generated because the Democrats have controlled 2/3 of the elected government for the past 7 years. Prior to their takeover, we had a healthy growing economy with a lot less needy/poor.
Who controlled the House in 2006? And, as I remember your posting, And, BTW, your graph is skewed. Is supposedly shows 2006 through 2012 yet Bush is credited with 1/2 of it. Apparently your source is as mathematically challenged as you are.