But you can't actually SAY it, for whatever reason. That's not a healthy thing, as it's a symptom of a larger issue. Even Joe wants to ignore this, again, for whatever reason. I smell bs, and you can chirp and squirm all you want, but the fact remains that no one else but myself has been capable of actually calling this guy's actions harassment. What more do I want? Nothing. Don't bother actually saying this guy was harassing women, if it upsets you so much, but if you plan on attempting to ridicule me for creating this thread and commenting on other peoples idiocies you can expect me to respond with "At least I can call this harassment. Why can't you?"
If I've ever ridiculed you personally, I certainly apologize...I was wrong. In this case, I appreciate you creating the thread and agree with your comments...and have said so. (move-on.org)
Take a shower. That might help No one has ridiculed you for creating this thread, but for the attempt to blame Republicans for the fact that a Democrat is harassing women. The mayor doesn't even make good news like Weiner for us to make fun of.
Please , that's false bravado. Only a fool thinks that such idiocies have any true value. And don't play stupid, you know what I meant: You haven't actually called the guy out, you only "agreed" with me that what he did was wrong, and that's two separate things. Man-up, on both counts, and act like an adult.
OK, seriously, I have no idea what you're getting at. Could you please give an example of the difference between... 1. Agreeing that a person is an unrepentant masher and whose actions don't deserve the endorsement of public office. ...and 2. "Calling the guy out". ...I honestly don't understand the difference between the two. As long as his party's power base recognizes they don't want people like this representing their party, I'm satisfied. I only get upset when partisans (of ANY party) circle the wagons and try to protect these bums.
He is just trying to blame everything he can on the "Republicans". I mean even the Big Bang happened because a Republican got mad.
Calling out? What kind of foolishness is that? I doubt there's a single person on this forum who gives a flip what clueless thinks...
Well then, you're either pretending to be an idiot, or you really are one. If you think I'm going to explain something to you that you should already know, then you are the latter.
So...you can't explain your posts to those of us with "lesser intelligence"? I thought you were here to help others understand your point of view. You have my undivided attention.
Explain to yourself what a "Filner Headlock" is, if you can. Now, try to figure out why that's an idiotic thing to say, if you can.
From what I can tell, your'e in San Diego, are wealthy, and likely met the guy. Is that why you're having issues? You say you consider Democrats evil, but also say you're not republican: What does that make you?
It's in the video I posted...did you watch it? My comment was meant as a joke...to help you concentrate your thoughts. Your statements in this thread (so far) seem a bit obtuse.
Wow...wrong on every point. New to Denver (from the DC area), middle-class, and I wouldn't give that bum the time of day. Most Democratic voters (non-criminals and those not abusing the Public Dole) are very nice, well meaning people. They simply let their hearts rule their minds and, subsequently, are easily duped by politicians with hidden, un-American agendas. I truly believe the the inner (Communist) core of the Democratic party means to do this country harm. I would describe myself as a Reagan/Perot/Tea Party Conservative...what, long ago, was known as a "Conservative Democrat". Marco Rubio and Rand Paul will likely have my vote should they chose to run.
Several of the liberals on this forum are admitted socialists or lean toward socialism/communism. The problem is that they don't see the path they're on and are being led like lambs to slaughter. The communist core of the Democrat Party considers them "useful idiots". You're a wise person, Yakpoo. Very wise, indeed. The Republican Party will need someone strong with good name recognition to run against that lying, sack-of-(fill in the blank) Hillary in 2016. Low information voters will come out in droves for her just like they did for Obama in 2008 and 2012. That's what the sway of a free "Obamaphone" will do...
My mistake. You remind me of a number of people I've met, and I'm thinning out the herd of possible contenders. As for the "core Democrats meaning to cause this country harm" and their "hidden, un-American agendas": Spoken like a true conservative/tea-party "patriot".
It failed, both as a joke and a guide. Why? Because you're being abrasive. If you can't see that, then I'm wasting my time explaining it to you. In all honesty, I don't see why I'm even bothering to explain it to you at all: You and I are of two opposing view-points on what's wrong in America, and neither of us is going to convince the other that one view is better than the other. In other words: This is a pointless exercise. This thread was written by a Democrat to say that a fellow Democrat is harassing women, and that what he's done is wrong. If you want to talk about obtuse, read the responses this thread got from everyone.