Obamacare costs? WOW! Just WOW!

I'd still like to get the facts (see post #20 above). I really do care to know them. So does Little Missy.

 

Maybe if you would answer his question, he might be more amenable to answering yours.

 

I'm not the one who brought up my work experience as giving me special insight into the background of a specific issue. In this case bankruptcy. He went out of his way to credit his 20 years in banking (now business consulting) as giving him the creds to make the assertion that he did.

And then he accused me of not wanting to know the facts about, presumably, the background that would serve to make me cease and desist on my allegedly inappropriate names and characterizations. And then when I do the followup that he has opened the door for, he disappears. You're full of it.

 

Always the victim, huh?

 

You seem to be digging at something so go ahead & ask whatever it is you want to ask (or, given your history here, go ahead and make the assumption you want to make).

 

The victim? Hmmm... No, I don't think so. Like most people I'm pretty impervious to victimization at the hands of whining, sanctimonious little Christobots like Davy. Ooops, name calling. Bad Takiji. Little Missy put me up to it.

 

See number 20 above. There is a question there. Something along the lines of, "What kinds of things did you advise them on?" Or words to that effect. I guess you missed it. Maybe rlm was blocking your view.

 

See number 9 above. There is a question for you (Takiji) there.

 

If you're talking about my work, my work is not really germane to the issue. Davy made certain assertions that he said were based on his 20 years in banking (now business consulting). And I'm asking about that. And he graciously said that he'd respond. So we're all good. I'm not quite sure what your role is here or why you think Davy is having trouble dealing with this. He doesn't seem to be to me.

 

You really weren't aware that banks perform many different functions?
Now, stop being a sissy (oops) & get to your real question.

 

"Sissy" "Little Missy" Tell me, did you need a note from your mother in order to join this site? I don't think you're old enough to have been a consultant or anything else yet, but we've come this far so we'll keep playing your game long enough to wrap it up. What was the nature of the consulting that you did? As you say, banks do a lot of things and so do consultants. That's all I'd like to know really. If it's not being too intrusive (that means nosy). Was the bankruptcy thing central or peripheral to your function? Take time to google if you like.

 

In case you haven't noticed, I really don't care what you think...sorry, I just don't.

Now, back to the matter at hand, what is your real question?

 

There's the problem, the circle-jerk mentality persists among republicans because they don't care to learn, they only care about keeping the circle-jerking going.

 

Yes, I know you're a jerk. I just have to keep in mind that you're not an adult one.

Now the question is simply, were bankruptcy issues

central or peripheral to your function?​

Your function as a consultant. I mean seriously. That's the question. Take all the time you need to ponder it. Ask others if you don't really remember. But that's all I'd like to know. Then you can go back to trumpeting your virtues just like Jesus was always doing with his. Or actually maybe not so much in Jesus's case.​

​

 

Oh no! Now I'm a jerk? How will I ever be able to carry on? I fear life, as I've known it, is coming to an end.....I don't have it's approval...

 

I can't believe it's as bad as all that. I expect you'll manage just fine.

So about bankruptcy and your 20 years' experience as a banking consultant. You invited the question and I asked it. It seems a pretty simple and innocuous one but it would appear that you would rather not answer it. That's okay. I'm sure you have your reasons. Let's just forget it, shall we?

 

Their problem seems with people trying to follow up or get more info on some assertion they've made. As far as I can tell, their attitude is don't ask questions about what I say, don't ask questions about my canned news bites, don't ask me anything about what I've posted, don't question me period because either I don't know or I'd rather not go into it any further.

And that's not necessarily bad I guess. There are things about which I haven't made up my mind, about which I really don't know as much as I should, about which I don't really care enough to have an opinion, and things about which I don't feel like sharing any more than I already have. I try not to post things like that in the first place. When this is the case with them I wish they'd just say so and get it over with, but instead they feed you what we've seen in this thread.

 

So, it's OK for you not to "share any more than you already have", but not for David? Why?

Our resident moron, Little Joe, has told us he works for an educational institution in Illinois, but little else. Is it really anyone's business other than what he chooses to share with us?

Our resident parrot, IQ<1, has told us he is/was a toothless garbage man. I don't think it's really necessary that we know any facts (if they are, indeed, facts) other than those he wishes to share.

That other brainless dolt, Themistokles, has told us he runs some sort of retreat, but won't share with us whether his employees are unionized or not.

So what? David isn't going into details about his life or work experience. You can either accept that and/or move on.

 

They are like boxers...old, blind boxers...who throw listless punches that rarely connect, then they dodge, duck weave, cry to the ref, and their mommies, when a real boxer slaps them around a bit.

You know, entertainment, like monkeys at the zoo...almost.

I mean, they do throw a lot of crap at you, but we tend to just laugh it off where we should really be thinking about locking the little fellas up in seclusion so they can't throw crap at everyone all the time. Once secluded, they can continue their circle-jerking at will, with no real harm done to anyone else.

It's also why I don't shake republican's "hands". Too much chit and other revolting stuff on their filthy little "hands". It does explain why they are so blind though....chit and other chit in the eyes and whatnot.

 

Of course it is and that applies to David too. If David or anyone else doesn't want to share any more of his/her/its personal stuff than he/she/it already has, that's fine. That being said, when he/she/it claims work related expertise or knowledge on a certain subject I can certainly ask for more details. But my asking hardly constitutes forcing him/her/it to do anything.

My point, and as usual I think you chose to miss it, was that if he doesn't want to provide any more background it would be nice if he'd just say so instead of giving us post after post of his paranoid song and dance. Especially keeping in mind that he doesn't care what I think. He really doesn't.

Exactly. I think that's what I said earlier.