By date, I was referring to the day Patriot's Day fell on. Is that really so hard to understand? You assumed something without asking whether I mean one thing or the other. That is your issue not mine. Perhaps if you weren't so eager to play "gotcha" you might actually have something worth adding to the thread.
The last time I checked, April 19th qualifies as a date and it was the most common reference in your copy/paste. And i know of no one who refers to Patriot's Day as a "date" - particularly since the DATE of the holiday is not fixed. If you were not so fixated in denigrating anything to the right of Bill Ayers, you might learn to be conversant. It would also help if you actually learned to admit you made a mistake.
I am just curious, but what would you call this post beside an attempt at a "gotcha post" (lacking in facts, BTW)?
I'd call it my opinion. EVERYTHING here is pretty much opinion. You throw the word "fact" around like it has meaning here. What joke! BTW In order to try and use a "gotcha", wouldn't I have to try to use YOUR or some other poster's words against them? You know, the way you do constantly except with actual success.
By the way, just what do you have against people who are willing to murder, bomb and use intimidation to get their way? Aren't those exactly the tactics used by the Weathermen and Bill Ayers whom you admire so much?
Fact: I posted your first post of you asking everyone not to blame your foes. Fact: Your very next post did exactly that! Fact: There is not enough public knowledge to convict Zimmerman of anything. Fact: You have openly stated that he is guilty of "disobeying a lawful order" where there is no such thing. You have openly stated that he is guilty of murder. Fact: You praised the Illinois legislature for increasing their taxes and spending to avert financial problems while I predicted they would sink. Maybe they aren't bankrupt - yet - but ....... Yes, I use the word fact a lot. That is what I base my opinions on rather than the prejudice you use. That is one major difference between you (and most liberals) and most conservatives. When facts get in your way, you attack the messenger. The major problem with that is that you (liberals) have been very successful using that tactic with the lame street media's support.
Oh, I could go on and on with that list, but those are just the items that quickly popped into my head.
Yes, it amazes me how quickly liberals reveal their prejudices. Absolutely NO suspects have been identified in the Boston bombing, yet our resident liberal pinhead is already trying to pin it on right-wing radicals. Now, it may turn out that it was a right-wing radical. Or a left-wing radical. Or neither. What is the problem with these ignorant liberals reserving judgment until the facts of a case are known? It's because their biases bubble out and they just can't help themselves.
Well, maybe we will find out soon. Fox is reporting that they have (possibly?) arrested someone in connection to the bombing.
That's a stupid thing to say. I based my opinion on the number of Right-wing group attacks since 1995 and if facts make me "prejudiced" then I would have to counter with "What are your facts for thinking I'm wrong?" Certainly the numbers are on my side. What's on your side? I guess we'll know f I'm right soon enough and if you've been wrong all along. Start up the back pedaling machine.
The fact that you have a bunch of selectively edited incidents (including at least drug and counterfeiting) listed and excluding EVERY liberal violent act proves nothing. The thread I referenced (http://www.partisanlines.com/threads/occupy-movement-magnet-for-violence.4055/) documented 21 incident in just the last 3 pages. It is 20 pages long. So, no, your "facts" do not justify your (obvious) "prejudices". And that does not even include the Wisconsin Capital occupation where you wanted to burn it down.
I keep telling you, they are all listed at http://www.partisanlines.com/threads/occupy-movement-magnet-for-violence.4055/. My further reading them for you will not help your prejudices one bit. BTW, I thought this one most interesting. One of you brothers and 2 documenting his violence. I wonder why it never made the news.
Again, I will ask how previous incidents have any bearing on the Boston bombing. Now Little Joe, I could see how YOU would tie a group like the Weathermen and Bill Ayers to the Boston bombing since they were known for building bombs. But, Ruby Ridge and Randy Weaver? Nope. No bombs involved... Like I've said before, this could be the work of anyone. Until the facts are known, you're just talking out of your ass.... again.
Indeed, with all the violence the Occupy Idiots were/are involved in, it wouldn't surprise me if they were responsible. But, I'm not laying blame at their feet simply because we don't know who is responsible yet.
No where have I said that the OWS was responsible for Boston. I am merely trying to point out how absurd Teddy's "numbers" are.
There have been a lot of women raped since 1995, too. Many of them were raped by liberals. Somewhere in this country, unfortunately, a woman is being raped right now. Using your logic, she's being raped by a liberal.