Riiiiiiiiight! You'll create an entire thread and call Democrats all a bunch of racists when one uses the term "white folks" but when a Con uses a term like wetbacks you have no comment on the racial slur. KIND OF MAKES ONE WONDER ABOUT YOUR OBJECTIVITY NOT TO MENTION YOUR SANITY. What butt bags you and your ilk prove to be day in and day out.
What!? No comment on your fellow Con? I'm SHOCKED! Shocked I tells ya! Like I have said before, Cons don't think of themselves as racists because it is just how they think so they have to accuse everyone else of being racists to avoid seeing their own racist statements, attitudes, and behaviors. The problem is that we ARE listening to them and we do here their words. Run away you Right-wing pukes. That is all you can do when the truth hits you directly in the face.
Certainly, it's a fact that some conservatives are racist. However, the undeniable fact is that many liberals are racist, too. Therein lies your problem. You're unwilling to admit that people with your same beliefs can possibly be racist. That's called "hypocrisy".
Untrue as I have said many times that racism can exist anywhere. You hear what you want to hear to reinforce your own prejudices. ALL Liberals are this... ALL Liberals are that... Again and again you make declarative statements filled with absolutes. My point is that when you have a long, long history of racist institutional policies that can be pointed to directly, you have laid out a track record of racism. I even believe that some the policy makers behind these racist policies probably don't believe everything they are supporting but are willing to support such policies because there is a conservative base that DOES believe in those policies. You simply do not find liberals catering to the same racist elements even if they do exist to some degree in their base. THAT is the difference. I can already predict that these are words that you cannot, will not hear. It just goes against your preconceptions of liberals. You need to get over that.
Yeah, I'm gonna side with the 97% of African Americans that think this guy is a total nut. You can have the 3% opinion. Granted those are rough statistics, just look at the percentage of African Americans that vote for the Democrats rather than the party this nut advocates for. If I made the assumption that the 2 political parties had stayed exactly the same for the past 150 years, I could make his arguments for him but I happen to know that today's political parties have no resemblance to the 2 political parties of 150 years ago. I also know that the southern Democrats where a coalition with the more liberal northern Democrats because they hated the party of Lincoln for 100 years and only left because the northern Democrats wouldn't abide by their racism. Where did they go? To a party that would abide by their racism and you're welcome to them. They are your problem now and have been since the 1960's. Own up to it.
I guess I could consider myself to be a "wet-back"...as in "laborer", but the term is derogatory in nature towards people South of our Southern border, and that pisses me off, so I just say I sweat a lot. When I work I usually get soaked in sweat, no matter the season. In time these "wet-backs" are going to control much of the Southern states, and all those white-folk down there are gonna be the "new" wet-backs. Don't forget to put your backs into it either, you lazy white bastards.
The reality is that at one time or another most folks have been racist, who here can say that they have never made a joke about another race in there lives?
